Developing a database of high definition endoscopic videos and images in your institution

Definition and purpose of a database of high definition endoscopic videos and images

The introduction of the computer has revolutionized countless aspects of modern medicine, from the use of social media in public health promotion [1] [2] [3] to the use of computer algorithms to develop genetic treatments in the burgeoning field of bioinformatics [4] [5]. Similarly, the introduction of a computer into the endoscopy suite affords many new possibilities and undoubtedly represents the future of the field. The ability to digitally immortalize endoscopy procedures and findings exactly as the endoscopist sees them could enable a host of advancements in education, research, and telemedicine. Unfortunately, there are a number of hurdles involved in realizing this vision, the first of which is that there is no easy all-in-one solution to integrating a computer into an endoscopy suite. A number of professional-grade hardware and software components must be brought together to enable video transfer, capture, import, and editing. Few gastroenterologists have the requisite familiarity with these technologies, and there has long been a need for greater education in this field. The solution we present is a database of high definition endoscopic videos and images, henceforth referred to as a DEVI. At its core, a DEVI consists of a video recorder, high-end computer, and video editing software, and facilitates a series of relatively straightforward tasks: the recording, editing, viewing, and sharing of endoscopies.

There is some literature in other medical disciplines, especially otolaryngology, which has addressed the recording of endoscopic procedures [6] [7] [8]. However, there are limitations to these reports: they do not discuss the latest high-definition technologies, they fail to consider professional-grade video editing solutions, and they recommend antiquated methods of video capture. The aim of this article is to describe in detail the process involved in creating a searchable database of recorded and edited high definition endoscopy videos in any gastrointestinal endoscopy suite. Furthermore, we describe the potential application of such technology in education, research, telemedicine, and remote consultations. Finally, we elaborate on the legal risks that might accompany DEVI use.

• References

• 1 Jones K, Baldwin KA, Lewis PR. The potential influence of a social media intervention on risky sexual behavior and Chlamydia incidence. J Community Health Nurs 2012; 29: 106-120
• 2 Akinfaderin-Agarau F, Chirtau M, Ekponimo S et al. Opportunities and limitations for using new media and mobile phones to expand access to sexual and reproductive health information and services for adolescent girls and young women in six Nigerian states. Afr J Reprod Health 2012; 16: 219-230
• 3 Norman CD, Yip AL. eHealth promotion and social innovation with youth: using social and visual media to engage diverse communities. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012; 172: 54-70
• 4 Castiglione F, Pappalardo F, Bernaschi M et al. Optimization of HAART with genetic algorithms and agent-based models of HIV infection. Bioinformatics 2007; 23: 3350-3355
• 5 Ma H, Zhao H. FacPad: Bayesian sparse factor modeling for the inference of pathways responsive to drug treatment. Bioinformatics 2012; 28: 2662-2670
• 6 Melder PC. Simplifying video endoscopy: inexpensive analog and digital video endoscopy in otolaryngology. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 132: 804-805
• 7 Pepper JP, Jackson RP, Crumley RL et al. Design of a low-cost, USB-compatible, otoscope image-capture system. Laryngoscope 2006; 116: 2224-2226
• 8 Papacharalampous G, Vamvakidis T, Bibas A. External video PC card for digital recording during otolaryngological endoscopic examination. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 138: 679-681
• 9 Krier M, Kaltenbach T, McQuaid K et al. Potential use of telemedicine to provide outpatient care for inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 2063-2067
• 10 Hixson LJ, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE et al. Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopy. J Natl Cancer Inst 1990; 82: 1769-1772
• 11 Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 24-28
• 12 Rex DK, Bond JH, Feld AD. Medical-legal risks of incident cancers after clearing colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 952-957
• 13 Potchen EJ, Bisesi MA. When is it malpractice to miss lung cancer on chest radiographs?. Radiology 1990; 175: 29-32
• 14 Plumeri PA. Colonoscopic gamble. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 946-947
• 15 Axon A, Hassan M, Niv Y et al. Ethical and legal implications in seeking and providing a second medical opinion. Dig Dis 2008; 26: 11-17
• 16 Leung ST, Kaplan KJ. Medicolegal aspects of telepathology. Hum Pathol 2009; 40: 1137-1142