Association of Fetal Heart Rate Baseline Change and Neonatal Outcomes

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to describe the incidence of baseline change within normal range during labor and its prediction of neonatal outcomes.

Materials and Methods This was a prospective cohort of singleton, nonanomalous, term neonates with continuous electronic fetal monitoring and normal baseline fetal heart rate throughout the last 2 hours of labor. We determined baseline in 10-minute segments using Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development criteria. We evaluated baseline changes of ≥ 20 and ≥ 30 bpm for association with acidemia (umbilical cord arterial pH ≤ 7.10) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Finally, we performed a sensitivity analysis of normal neonates, excluding those with acidemia, NICU admission, or 5-minute Apgar < 4.

Results Among all neonates (n = 3,021), 1,267 (41.9%) had change ≥ 20 bpm; 272 (9.0%) had ≥ 30 bpm. Among normal neonates (n = 2,939), 1,221 (41.5%) had change ≥20 bpm. Acidemia was not associated with baseline change of any direction or magnitude. NICU admission was associated with decrease ≥ 20 bpm (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.93; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19 – 7.21) or any direction ≥ 20 bpm (aOR: 4.06; 95% CI: 1.46–11.29). For decrease ≥ 20 bpm, sensitivity and specificity were 40.0 and 81.7%; for any direction ≥ 20 bpm, 75.0 and 58.3%.

Conclusion Changes of normal baseline are common in term labor and poorly predict morbidity, regardless of direction or magnitude.

Keywords

baseline change - electronic fetal monitoring - neonatal outcome - neonatal acidemia

Note

This work was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01: HD 06161619-01A1, PI Dr. Alison Cahill). This work was presented orally as an abstract at the 35th annual meeting of the Society of Maternal and Fetal Medicine, San Diego, CA, February 2–7, 2015.

• References

• 1 Macones GA, Hankins GD, Spong CY, Hauth J, Moore T. The 2008 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop report on electronic fetal monitoring: update on definitions, interpretation, and research guidelines. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112 (03) 661-666
• 2 Gilstrap III LC, Hauth JC, Hankins GD, Beck AW. Second-stage fetal heart rate abnormalities and type of neonatal acidemia. Obstet Gynecol 1987; 70 (02) 191-195
• 3 Cahill AG, Caughey AB, Roehl KA, Odibo AO, Macones GA. Terminal fetal heart decelerations and neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (05) 1070-1076
• 4 Hamilton BE, Hoyert DL, Martin JA, Strobino DM, Guyer B. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2010-2011. Pediatrics 2013; 131 (03) 548-558
• 5 Renou P, Newman W, Wood C. Autonomic control of fetal heart rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969; 105 (06) 949-953
• 6 Cabaniss ML, Ross GM. Fetal Monitoring Interpretation, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010
• 7 Bobitt JR, Ledger WJ. Obstetric observations in eleven cases of neonatal sepsis due to the group B beta hemolytic streptococcus. Obstet Gynecol 1976; 47 (04) 439-442
• 8 Jadhon ME, Main EK. Fetal bradycardia associated with maternal hypothermia. Obstet Gynecol 1988; 72 (3 Pt 2): 496-497
• 9 Langer O, Cohen WR. Persistent fetal bradycardia during maternal hypoglycemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 149 (06) 688-690