Aktuelle Ernährungsmedizin 2018; 43(03): 242-243
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1647228
Postersitzung VI
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Modeling the effects of ketogenic therapy on survival in patients with high grade glioma using Bayesian evidence synthesis

RJ Klement
1   Leopoldina Krankenhaus Schweinfurt, Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Schweinfurt, Germany
,
PS Bandyopadhyay
2   Montana State University, Department of History & Philosophy, Bozeman, United States
,
CE Champ
3   University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Pittsburgh, United States
,
H Walach
4   Medical University Poznan, Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Poznan, Poland
5   Universität Witten-Herdecke, Abteilung für Psychologie, Witten, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 June 2018 (online)

 
 

    Background:

    Ketogenic therapy in the form of ketogenic diets or calorie restriction has been proposed as a metabolic treatment of high grade glioma (HGG) brain tumors based on mechanistic reasoning obtained mainly from animal experiments. Given the paucity of clinical studies of this relatively new approach, our goal is to extrapolate evidence from the greater number of animal studies and synthesize it with the available human data in order to estimate the expected effects of ketogenic therapy on survival in HGG patients.

    Methods and Findings:

    A Bayesian hierarchical model was developed. Data from three human cohort studies and 17 animal experiments were included to estimate the effects of four ketogenic interventions (calorie restriction/ketogenic diets as monotherapy/combination therapy) on the restricted mean survival time ratio in humans using various assumptions for the relationships between humans, rats and mice. The impact of various assumptions about the relevance of animal data for humans as well as external information based on mechanistic reasoning or case studies was evaluated by specifying appropriate priors. We provide statistical and philosophical arguments for why our Bayesian approach is an improvement over existing (frequentist) methods for evidence synthesis; one is that it is able to utilize evidence from a variety of sources. Depending on the prior assumptions, a 30 – 70% restricted mean survival time prolongation in HGG patients was predicted by the models. The highest probability of a benefit (> 90%) for all four ketogenic interventions was obtained when adopting an enthusiastic prior based on previous case reports together with assuming synergism between ketogenic therapies with other forms of treatment. Combinations with other treatments were generally found more effective than ketogenic monotherapy.

    Zoom Image
    Fig. 1: Estimates of MR for different priors. MR> 1 indicates longer survival with ketogenic therapy.

    Conclusions:

    Combining evidence from both human and animal studies is statistically possible using a Bayesian approach. We found an overall survival-prolonging effect of ketogenic therapy in HGG patients. Our approach is best compatible with a circular instead of hierarchical view of evidence and easy to update once more data become available.


    #
     
    Zoom Image
    Fig. 1: Estimates of MR for different priors. MR> 1 indicates longer survival with ketogenic therapy.