PDF herunterladen
Semin Reprod Med 2005; 23(4): 301-308
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-923387
Copyright © 2005 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

New Approaches to Assisted Reproductive Technologies

David L. Keefe1 , John P. Parry2
  • 1Director, Division of Reproductive Medicine and Infertility, Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island; Medical Director, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts-New England Medical Center, 750 Washington Street, Boston, Massachusetts
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
29. November 2005 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

ABSTRACT

Egg infertility remains the greatest challenge in the treatment of the infertile couple. As women increasingly delay attempts at childbearing, egg infertility has become more prevalent. Attempts to overcome egg infertility by superovulation and in vitro fertilization have produced an epidemic of multiple gestations, itself a major public health concern. The pathophysiology of egg infertility arises from chromosomal nondisjunction. Cytogenetic analyses of polar bodies and/or blastomeres currently provide the most powerful predictors of egg infertility. Approaches that label all chromosomes (spectral karyotyping and comparative genomic hybridization), or identify predisposition to aneuploidy (spindle imaging, telomere length measurement) are on the horizon. For the foreseeable future, the treatment of egg infertility will be limited to egg donation for severe cases and transfer of the most viable embryos for milder cases. Oocyte reconstitution not only lacks evidence of clinical efficacy, but also biological credibility, given that growing evidence supports the primacy of chromosomes themselves in meiotic nondisjunction.

KEYWORDS

Reproductive technologies - fertilization in vitro - infertility - female infertility

REFERENCES

  • 1 Ezra Y, Laufer S A. Defective oocytes in a new subgroup of unexplained infertility.  Fertil Steril. 1992;  58 24-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Lutjen P J, Leeton J F, Findlay J K. Oocyte and embryo donation in IVF programmes.  Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1985;  12(4) 799-813
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Navot D, Bergh P A, Williams M A et al.. Poor oocyte quality rather than implantation failure as a cause of age-related decline in female fertility.  Lancet. 1991;  33(8754) 1375-1377
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Sauer M V, Paulson R J. Oocyte and embryo donation.  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1995;  7(3) 193-198
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Callahan T L, Hall J E, Ettner S L et al.. The economic impact of multiple-gestation pregnancies and the contribution of assisted-reproduction techniques to their incidence.  N Engl J Med. 1994;  331 244-249
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Abdalla H I, Burton G, Kirkland A et al.. Age, pregnancy and miscarriage: uterine versus ovarian factors.  Hum Reprod. 1993;  8(9) 1512-1517
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Toner J P, Philput C B, Jones G S, Muasher S J. Basal follicle-stimulating hormone level is a better predictor of in vitro fertilization performance than age.  Fertil Steril. 1991;  55(4) 784-791
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Corson S L, Gutmann J, Batzer F R et al.. Inhibin-B as a test of ovarian reserve for infertile women.  Hum Reprod. 1999;  14 2818-2821
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gulekli B, Bulbul Y, Onvural A et al.. Accuracy of ovarian reserve tests.  Hum Reprod. 1999;  14(11) 2822-2826
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hall J E, Welt C K, Cramer D W. Inhibin A and inhibin B reflect ovarian function in assisted reproduction but are less useful at predicting outcome.  Hum Reprod. 1999;  14(2) 409-415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Sharara F I, Scott Jr R T, Seifer D B. The detection of diminished ovarian reserve in infertile women.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;  179 804-812
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Keefe D L. Reproductive aging is an evolutionarily programmed strategy that no longer provides adaptive value.  Fertil Steril. 1998;  70(2) 204-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Baker T G. A quantitative and cytological study of germ cells in humn ovaries.  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1963;  158 417-433
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Baker T G, Sum W. Development of the ovary and oogenesis.  Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1976;  3 3-26
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hassold T, Chiu D. Maternal age-specific rates of numerical chromosome abnormalities with special reference to trisomy.  Hum Genet. 1985;  70(1) 11-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Freidine M et al.. Polar body diagnosis of common aneuploidies by FISH.  J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996;  13(2) 157-162
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Ivakhnenko V et al.. Prepregnancy genetic testing for age-related aneuploidies by polar body analysis.  Genet Test. 1997;  1(4) 231-235
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Ivakhnenko V et al.. Preimplantation diagnosis of common aneuploidies by the first- and second-polar body FISH analysis.  J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;  15(5) 285-289
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Ivakhnenko V et al.. Prevention of age-related aneuploidies by polar body testing of oocytes.  J Assist Reprod Genet. 1999;  16(4) 165-169
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Verlinsky Y, Evsikov S. Karyotyping of human oocytes by chromosomal analysis of the second polar bodies.  Mol Hum Reprod. 1999;  5(2) 89-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Marquez C, Sandalinas M, Bahce M, Alikani M, Munne S. Chromosome abnormalities in 1255 cleavage-stage human embryos.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2000;  1(1) 17-26
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Munne S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, Marquez C, Cohen J. Chromosome mosaicism in cleavage-stage human embryos: evidence of a maternal age effect.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;  4(3) 223-232
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Obasaju M, Kadam A, Biancardi T et al.. Pregnancies from single normal embryo transfer in women older than 40 years.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2001;  2(2) 98-101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Bahce M, Cohen J, Munne S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy: were we looking at the wrong chromosomes?.  J Assist Reprod Genet. 1999;  16(4) 176-181
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Abdelhadi I, Colls P, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, Munne S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical abnormalities for 13 chromosomes.  Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;  6(2) 226-231
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Sandalinas M, Marquez C, Munne S. Spectral karyotyping of fresh, non-inseminated oocytes.  Mol Hum Reprod. 2002;  8(6) 580-585
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Wells D, Escudero T, Levy B et al.. First clinical application of comparative genomic hybridization and polar body testing for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy.  Fertil Steril. 2002;  78(3) 543-549
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Bolton V N, Hawes S M, Taylor C I, Parsons J H. Development of spare human preimplantation embryos in vitro: an analysis of the correlations among gross morphology, cleavage rates, and development to the blastocyst.  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer. 1989;  6 30-35
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Battaglia D E, Goodwin P, Klein N A, Soules M R. Influence of maternal age on meiotic spindle assembly in oocytes from naturally cycling women.  Hum Reprod. 1996;  11(10) 2217-2222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Oldenbourg R. Polarized light microscopy of spindles.  Methods Cell Biol. 1999;  61 175-208
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Sato H, Ellis G W, Inoue S. Microtubular origin of mitotic spindle for birefringence.  J Cell Biol. 1975;  67 501-517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Wang W H, Meng L, Hackett R J, Odenbourg R, Keefe D L. The spindle observation and its relationship with fertilization after intracytoplasmic sperm injection in living human oocytes.  Fertil Steril. 2001;  75(2) 348-353
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Liu L, Oldenbourg R, Trimarchi J R, Keefe D L. A reliable, noninvasive technique for spindle imaging and enucleation of mammalian oocytes.  Nat Biotechnol. 2000;  18(2) 223-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Keefe D, Tran P, Pellegrini C, Oldenbourg R. Polarized light microscopy and digital image processing identify a multilaminar structure of the hamster zona pellucida.  Hum Reprod. 1997;  12 1250-1252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Silva C P, Silva V, Kommineni K, Keefe D. Effect of in vitro culture of mammalian embryos on the architecture of the zona pellucida.  Biol Bull. 1997;  193(2) 235-236
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Silva C P, Kommineni K, Oldenbourg R, Keefe D L. The first polar body does not predict accurately the location of the metaphase II meiotic spindle in mammalian oocytes.  Fertil Steril. 1999;  71 719-721
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Wang W H, Meng L, Hackett R J, Keefe D L. Developmental ability of human oocytes with or without birefringent spindles imaged by Polscope before insemination.  Hum Reprod. 2001;  16(7) 1464-1468
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Liu L, Keefe D L. Aging-associated aberration in meiosis of oocytes from senescence-accelerated mouse (SAM).  Hum Reprod. 2002;  17 2678-2685
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Wang W H, Meng L, Hackett R J, Oldenbourg R, Keefe D L. Rigorous thermal control during intracytoplasmic sperm injection stabilizes the meiotic spindle and improves fertilization and pregnancy rates.  Fertil Steril. 2002;  77 1274-1277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Wright D L, Jones E L, Mayer J F et al.. Characterization of telomerase activity in the human oocyte and preimplantation embryo.  Mol Hum Reprod. 2001;  7(10) 947-955
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Henderson S A, Edwards R G. Chiasma frequency and maternal age in mammals.  Nature. 1968;  218(136) 22-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Polani P E, Crolla J A. A test of the production line hypothesis of mammalian oogenesis.  Hum Genet. 1991;  88(1) 64-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Bass H W, Marshall W F, Sedat J W, Agard D A, Cande W Z. Telomeres cluster de novo before the initiation of synapsis: a three-dimensional spatial analysis of telomere positions before and during meiotic prophase.  J Cell Biol. 1997;  137(1) 5-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Bass H W, Riera-Lizarazu O, Ananiev E V et al.. Evidence for the coincident initiation of homolog pairing and synapsis during the telomere-clustering (bouquet) stage of meiotic prophase.  J Cell Sci. 2000;  113 1033-1042
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 de Lange T. Ending up with the right partner.  Nature. 1998;  392(6678) 753-754
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Scherthan H, Jerratsch M, Li B et al.. Mammalian meiotic telomeres: protein composition and redistribution in relation to nuclear pores.  Mol Biol Cell. 2000;  11(12) 4189-4203
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Scherthan H, Weich S, Schwegler H et al.. Centromere and telomere movements during early meiotic prophase of mouse and man are associated with the onset of chromosome pairing.  J Cell Biol. 1996;  134(5) 1109-1125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Liu L, Blasco M A, Keefe D L. Requirement of functional telomeres for metaphase chromosome alignments and integrity of meiotic spindles.  EMBO Rep. 2002;  3 230-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Poon S S, Martens U M, Ward R K, Lansdorp P M. Telomere length measurements using digital fluorescence microscopy.  Cytometry. 1999;  36 267-278
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Liu L, Trimarchi J R, Smith P J, Keefe D L. Mitochondrial dysfunction leads to telomere attrition and genomic instability.  Aging Cell. 2002;  1 40-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Liu L, Blasco M, Trimarchi J, Keefe D. An essential role for functional telomeres in mouse germ cells during fertilization and early development.  Dev Biol. 2002;  249 74-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Zhang J, Wang C W, Krey L et al.. In vitro maturation of human preovulatory oocytes reconstructed by germinal vesicle transfer.  Fertil Steril. 1999;  71(4) 726-731
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Cohen J, Scott R, Schimmel T, Levron J, Willadsen S. Birth of infant after transfer of anucleate donor oocyte cytoplasm into recipient eggs.  Lancet. 1997;  350 186-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Foote R H. Contemporary endocrinology: assisted fertilization and nuclear transfer in mammals. In: Wolf DP, Zelinski-Wooten M Contempory Endocrinology. Totowa, NJ; Humana Press 2001: 3-20
    Google Scholar
  • 55 Rinaudo P, Niven-Fairchild T, Buradagunta S et al.. Microinjection of mitochondria into zygotes creates a model for studying the inheritance of mitochondrial DNA during preimplantation development.  Fertil Steril. 1999;  71 912-918
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Gartner K, Bodioli, Hill, Rapp. High variability of body sizes within nucleus-transfer-clones of calves: artifacts or a biological feature?.  Reprod Com Anim. 1998;  33 67-75
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Takeda K, Takahashi S, Onishi A, Goto Y, Miyazawa A, Imai H. Dominant distribution of mitochondrial DNA from recipient oocytes in bovine embryos and offspring after nuclear transfer.  J Reprod Fertil. 1999;  116 253-259
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Liu L, Keefe D L. Cytoplasm mediates both development and oxidation-induced apoptotic cell death in mouse zygotes.  Biol Reprod. 2000;  62(6) 1828-1834
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

David L KeefeM.D. 

Director, Division of Reproductive Medicine and Infertility

Women and Infants Hospital, 101 Dudley Street, Providence, RI 02905

eMail: Dkeefe@wihri.org

      >