Am J Perinatol 1997; 14(5): 245-248
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-994136
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

© 1997 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.

Cesarean Deliveries at a University Hospital: Analysis of Rates and Indications

Jeffrey K. Pollard, Eleanor L. Capeless
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 March 2008 (online)

ABSTRACT

The objective of this paper is to evaluate the influence of patient risk status on the incidence of and indications for cesarean delivery. All live births ≥23 weeks at the University of Vermont in 1995 (n = 2395) were retrospectively analyzed for delivery route, indication for cesarean, gestational age, parity, and practice group (to reflect risk status). The total cesarean rate was 14.4% (344 of 2395), and the primary rate was 11.4% (244 of 2144). Abnormal presentation was the most common indication (25.6%, 88 of 344). The “corrected” cesarean rate (maternal-fetal medicine and transported patients excluded) was 12.4% (273 of 2194), and the “corrected” primary rate was 9.6% (190 of 1975). Furthermore, when all deliveries were analyzed, regardless of risk status but limited to gestational age ≥36 weeks, the rates did not change (12.6%, 280 of 2214; primary 9.2%, 183 of 1994). Arrest of dilation was the most common indication in both “corrected” subgroups (23.4 and 24.6%, respectively). Cesarean rates at tertiary care hospitals should be compared with rates at community hospitals only after correcting for dissimilar patient groups or gestational age.

    >