Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction

Abstract

Nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) is among the most common causes of male infertility. For men with NOA seeking fertility treatment, microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) is the best option for retrieving sperm, which can be used with in vitro fertilization–intracytoplasmic sperm injection to achieve pregnancy in their partner. With the aid of the operating microscope, microTESE allows for thorough evaluation of the testis tissue and selection of seminiferous tubules that appear most capable of sperm production. Rates of success with microTESE vary depending on the underlying cause of NOA and the center at which the procedure is performed. Not all patients are candidates for microTESE, and those who are candidates should be counseled on the likelihood of sperm retrieval and the potential for changes in postoperative testis function.

Keywords

male infertility - nonobstructive azoospermia - sperm retrieval

Publication History

Article published online:
23 January 2024

• References

• 1 Chiba K, Enatsu N, Fujisawa M. Management of non-obstructive azoospermia. Reprod Med Biol 2016; 15 (03) 165-173
• 2 Schlegel PN, Sigman M, Collura B. et al. Diagnosis and treatment of infertility in men: AUA/ASRM guideline part II. Fertil Steril 2021; 115 (01) 62-69
• 3 Vicari E, Mongioì A, Calogero AE. et al. Therapy with human chorionic gonadotrophin alone induces spermatogenesis in men with isolated hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism – long-term follow-up. Int J Androl 1992; 15 (04) 320-329
• 4 Burgués S, Calderón MD. Spanish Collaborative Group on Male Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism. Subcutaneous self-administration of highly purified follicle stimulating hormone and human chorionic gonadotrophin for the treatment of male hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism. Hum Reprod 1997; 12 (05) 980-986
• 5 Ramasamy R, Ricci JA, Palermo GD, Gosden LV, Rosenwaks Z, Schlegel PN. Successful fertility treatment for Klinefelter's syndrome. J Urol 2009; 182 (03) 1108-1113
• 6 Majzoub A, Arafa M, Al Said S. et al. Outcome of testicular sperm extraction in nonmosaic Klinefelter syndrome patients: what is the best approach?. Andrologia 2016; 48 (02) 171-176
• 7 Coviello AD, Bremner WJ, Matsumoto AM. et al. Intratesticular testosterone concentrations comparable with serum levels are not sufficient to maintain normal sperm production in men receiving a hormonal contraceptive regimen. J Androl 2004; 25 (06) 931-938
• 8 Mehmood S, Aldaweesh S, Junejo NN, Altaweel WM, Kattan SA, Alhathal N. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: overall results and impact of preoperative testosterone level on sperm retrieval rate in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia. Urol Ann 2019; 11 (03) 287-293
• 9 Reifsnyder JE, Ramasamy R, Husseini J, Schlegel PN. Role of optimizing testosterone before microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol 2012; 188 (02) 532-536
• 10 Hussein A, Ozgok Y, Ross L, Rao P, Niederberger C. Optimization of spermatogenesis-regulating hormones in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia and its impact on sperm retrieval: a multicentre study. BJU Int 2013; 111 (3, Pt B): E110-E114
• 11 Deruyver Y, Vanderschueren D, Van der Aa F. Outcome of microdissection TESE compared with conventional TESE in non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review. Andrology 2014; 2 (01) 20-24
• 12 Donoso P, Tournaye H, Devroey P. Which is the best sperm retrieval technique for non-obstructive azoospermia? A systematic review. Hum Reprod Update 2007; 13 (06) 539-549
• 13 Bernie AM, Mata DA, Ramasamy R, Schlegel PN. Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for nonobstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2015; 104 (05) 1099-103.e1 , 3
• 14 Amer M, Ateyah A, Hany R, Zohdy W. Prospective comparative study between microsurgical and conventional testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia: follow-up by serial ultrasound examinations. Hum Reprod 2000; 15 (03) 653-656
• 15 Tsujimura A, Miyagawa Y, Takao T. et al. Salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction after failed conventional testicular sperm extraction in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol 2006; 175 (04) 1446-1449 , discussion 1449
• 16 Colpi GM, Colpi EM, Piediferro G. et al. Microsurgical TESE versus conventional TESE for ICSI in non-obstructive azoospermia: a randomized controlled study. Reprod Biomed Online 2009; 18 (03) 315-319
• 17 Jensen CFS, Ohl DA, Fode M. et al. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction versus multiple needle-pass percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration in men with nonobstructive azoospermia: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol 2022; 82 (04) 377-384
• 18 Ozveri H, Kayabasoglu F, Demirel C, Donmez E. Outcomes of micro-dissection TESE in patients with non-mosaic Klinefelter's syndrome without hormonal treatment. Int J Fertil Steril 2015; 8 (04) 421-428
• 19 Schiff JD, Palermo GD, Veeck LL, Goldstein M, Rosenwaks Z, Schlegel PN. Success of testicular sperm extraction [corrected] and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with Klinefelter syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2005; 90 (11) 6263-6267 [Erratum in: J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;91(10):4027. PMID: 16131585]
• 20 Okada H, Goda K, Yamamoto Y. et al. Age as a limiting factor for successful sperm retrieval in patients with nonmosaic Klinefelter's syndrome. Fertil Steril 2005; 84 (06) 1662-1664
• 21 Emre Bakircioglu M, Erden HF, Kaplancan T, Ciray N, Bener F, Bahceci M. Aging may adversely affect testicular sperm recovery in patients with Klinefelter syndrome. Urology 2006; 68 (05) 1082-1086
• 22 Koga M, Tsujimura A, Takeyama M. et al. Clinical comparison of successful and failed microdissection testicular sperm extraction in patients with nonmosaic Klinefelter syndrome. Urology 2007; 70 (02) 341-345
• 23 Chen XL, Wei YA, Ren XH. et al. Predictive factors for successful sperm retrieval by microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermia and a history of cryptorchidism. Asian J Androl 2022; 24 (05) 503-508
• 24 Barbotin AL, Dauvergne A, Dumont A. et al. Bilateral versus unilateral cryptorchidism in nonobstructive azoospermia: testicular sperm extraction outcomes. Asian J Androl 2019; 21 (05) 445-451
• 25 Arasteh H, Gilani MAS, Ramezani-Binabaj M, Babaei M. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction outcomes in azoospermic patients with bilateral orchidopexy. Andrology 2023; ; (Epub ahead of print)
• 26 Raman JD, Schlegel PN. Testicular sperm extraction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection is successful for the treatment of nonobstructive azoospermia associated with cryptorchidism. J Urol 2003; 170 (4, Pt 1): 1287-1290
• 27 Miraghazadeh A, Sadighi Gilani MA, Reihani-Sabet F, Ghaheri A, Borjian Boroujeni P, Zamanian M. Detection of partial AZFc microdeletions in azoospermic infertile men is not informative of microTESE outcome. Int J Fertil Steril 2019; 12 (04) 298-302
• 28 Stahl PJ, Masson P, Mielnik A, Marean MB, Schlegel PN, Paduch DA. A decade of experience emphasizes that testing for Y microdeletions is essential in American men with azoospermia and severe oligozoospermia. Fertil Steril 2010; 94 (05) 1753-1756
• 29 Sabbaghian M, Mohseni Meybodi A, Rafaee A, Saba S, Zamanian M, Sadighi Gilani MA. Sperm retrieval rate and reproductive outcome of infertile men with azoospermia factor c deletion. Andrologia 2018; 50 (07) e13052
• 30 Behre HM, Bergmann M, Simoni M. et al. Primary testicular failure. [Updated August 30, 2015]. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A. et al., eds. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth, MA: MDText.com, Inc.; 2000. . Accessed December 7, 2023 at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279076/
• 31 Patrat C, Bienvenu T, Janny L. et al. Clinical data and parenthood of 63 infertile and Y-microdeleted men. Fertil Steril 2010; 93 (03) 822-832
• 32 Brant A, Punjani N, Zaninovic N, Palermo GD, Rosenwaks Z, Schlegel PN. Effects of chemo- and radiation therapy on microsurgical testicular sperm extraction for men with nonobstructive azoospermia. J Urol 2022; 208 (03) 676-683
• 33 Chung E, Brock GB. Cryptorchidism and its impact on male fertility: a state of art review of current literature. Can Urol Assoc J 2011; 5 (03) 210-214
• 34 Das A, Halpern JA, Darves-Bornoz AL. et al. Sperm retrieval success and testicular histopathology in idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia. Asian J Androl 2020; 22 (06) 555-559
• 35 Johnson M, Raheem A, De Luca F. et al. An analysis of the frequency of Y-chromosome microdeletions and the determination of a threshold sperm concentration for genetic testing in infertile men. BJU Int 2019; 123 (02) 367-372
• 36 Sabbaghian M, Modarresi T, Hosseinifar H. et al. Comparison of sperm retrieval and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in patients with and without Klinefelter syndrome. Urology 2014; 83 (01) 107-110
• 37 Bakircioglu ME, Ulug U, Erden HF. et al. Klinefelter syndrome: does it confer a bad prognosis in treatment of nonobstructive azoospermia?. Fertil Steril 2011; 95 (05) 1696-1699
• 38 Iwatsuki S, Sasaki S, Taguchi K. et al. Effect of obesity on sperm retrieval outcome and reproductive hormone levels in Japanese azoospermic men with and without Klinefelter syndrome. Andrology 2017; 5 (01) 82-86
• 39 Nagirnaja L, Mørup N, Nielsen JE. et al. Variant PNLDC1, defective piRNA processing, and azoospermia. N Engl J Med 2021; 385 (08) 707-719
• 40 Wyrwoll MJ, Köckerling N, Vockel M. et al. Genetic architecture of azoospermia-time to advance the standard of care. Eur Urol 2023; 83 (05) 452-462
• 41 Abdullah L, Bondagji N. Histopathological patterns of testicular biopsy in male infertility: a retrospective study from a tertiary care center in the western part of Saudi Arabia. Urol Ann 2011; 3 (01) 19-23
• 42 Gnessi L, Scarselli F, Minasi MG. et al. Testicular histopathology, semen analysis and FSH, predictive value of sperm retrieval: supportive counseling in case of reoperation after testicular sperm extraction (TESE). BMC Urol 2018; 18 (01) 63
• 43 Seo JT, Ko WJ. Predictive factors of successful testicular sperm recovery in non-obstructive azoospermia patients. Int J Androl 2001; 24 (05) 306-310
• 44 Schlegel PN, Su LM. Physiological consequences of testicular sperm extraction. Hum Reprod 1997; 12 (08) 1688-1692
• 45 Ramasamy R, Yagan N, Schlegel PN. Structural and functional changes to the testis after conventional versus microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Urology 2005; 65 (06) 1190-1194
• 46 Takada S, Tsujimura A, Ueda T. et al. Androgen decline in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia after microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Urology 2008; 72 (01) 114-118
• 47 Everaert K, De Croo I, Kerckhaert W. et al. Long term effects of micro-surgical testicular sperm extraction on androgen status in patients with non obstructive azoospermia. BMC Urol 2006; 6: 9