J Wrist Surg
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787179
Scientific Article

Medium-Term Patient-Reported Outcomes after Surgical Management of Perilunate Injury: A Multiinstitutional Experience

1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
,
Samuel H. Payne
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
,
2   Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
,
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
,
Avani A. Patel
3   Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, Georgia
,
William Knaus
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
,
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
› Author Affiliations

Funding None.
Preview

Abstract

Background There is a lack of consensus on the optimal treatment of perilunate injuries (PLIs). Open reduction with internal fixation with scapholunate (SL) ligament repair is recommended; however, procedures such as lunotriquetral (LT) ligament repair, carpal tunnel release (CTR), proximal row carpectomy, denervation, and arthrodesis may also be used.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after surgical management of PLIs.

Methods A retrospective review of surgically treated PLIs at two institutions in a major metropolitan city from 2014 to 2020 was conducted. Demographics, radiographic data, and details of surgical management were reviewed. PROs were prospectively collected and analyzed.

Results Eighty-seven patients with surgically managed PLIs were identified. The average time to surgery was 4 ± 7days. Twenty-six percent of patients presented with acute median neuropathy. Thirty-seven patients provided PROs for analysis. Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation scores were 22 ± 12.9, 14.4 ± 11.3, and 37 ± 22 for pain, function, and total scores, respectively. Satisfaction was 7 ± 3 Sixteen percent of patients were unable to maintain employment due to their injury. The interval to return to work was 6.3 ± 7.7 months.

Conclusion PLIs cause significant morbidity and affect patients' ability to return to work. While open reduction with SL repair is routinely performed to treat PLIs, additional procedures may be considered. Undergoing concurrent CTR in the absence of neurological symptoms showed no differences in outcomes.

Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Statement of Human and Animal Rights

All human and animal studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.


Statement of Informed Consent

All patients were informed of possible participation in compliance with local institutional review board requirements.


Investigation performed at the Emory Clinic, Atlanta, Georgia.




Publication History

Received: 04 February 2024

Accepted: 01 May 2024

Article published online:
26 June 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA