Long-term clinical results of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia: First report of more than 10-year patient experience as assessed with a questionnaire-based survey

Abstract

Background and study aims Since per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) was introduced in 2010, it has become accepted as one of the standard treatments for esophageal achalasia worldwide. This study aimed to present long-term clinical results of POEM over 10 years and evaluate the technique and outcomes at the institution where it was first used in clinical settings.

Patients and methods Questionnaire-based surveys were sent to patients who received POEM in our institution from September 2008 to May 2010. Patient demographics and procedural outcomes and open-ended questions were posed about the postoperative courses, including symptom improvement and recurrence, additional treatments, and post-POEM gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms. Achalasia symptoms and post-POEM GERD symptoms were evaluated with Eckhardt scores and GerdQ systems, respectively.

Results Thirty-six consecutive POEMs were performed in that period and 10-year follow-up data were obtained from 15 patients (41.7 %). Although four cases (26.7 %) required additional pneumatic balloon dilatation (PBD), reduction in post-Eckardt scores were observed in 14 cases (93.3 %). GerdQ score was positive in one patient (6.7 %). Proton pump inhibitors (PPI) were taken by four patients (26.7 %) and their symptoms were well-controlled.

Conclusions Clinical results of POEM over 10 years were favorable regardless of various factors. Symptoms improved even in patients who required additional treatments, suggesting that POEM plays a significant role in treatment of achalasia.

Publication History

Received: 24 September 2020

Accepted: 02 November 2020

Article published online:
19 February 2021

• References

• 1 Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 265-271
• 2 Inoue H, Shiwaku H, Iwakiri K. et al. Clinical practice guidelines for peroral endoscopic myotomy. Dig Endosc 2018; 30: 563-579
• 3 Zaninotto G, Bennett C, Boeckxstaens G. et al. The 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines. Dis Esophagus 2018; 31: 1-29
• 4 Kahrilas PJ, Katzka D, Richter JE. Clinical Practice Update: The Use of Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy in Achalasia: Expert Review and Best Practice Advice From the AGA Institute. Gastroenterology 2017; 153: 1205-1211
• 5 Shiwaku H, Inoue H, Sato H. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: a prospective multicenter study in Japan. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: 1037-1044, e1032
• 6 Inoue H, Shiwaku H, Kobayashi Y. et al. Statement for gastroesophageal reflux disease after peroral endoscopic myotomy from an international multicenter experience. Esophagus 2020; 17: 3-10
• 7 Repici A, Fuccio L, Maselli R. et al. GERD after per-oral endoscopic myotomy as compared with Heller's myotomy with fundoplication: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 934-943, e918
• 8 Grimes KL, Inoue H, Onimaru M. et al. Double-scope per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2016; 30: 1344-1351
• 9 Rieder E, Swanstrom LL, Perretta S. et al. Intraoperative assessment of esophagogastric junction distensibility during per oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal motility disorders. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 400-405
• 10 Li QL, Wu QN, Zhang XC. et al. Outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of esophageal achalasia with a median follow-up of 49 months. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 1405-1412, e1403
• 11 Teitelbaum EN, Dunst CM, Reavis KM. et al. Clinical outcomes five years after POEM for treatment of primary esophageal motility disorders. Surg Endosc 2018; 32: 421-427
• 12 Jones R, Junghard O, Dent J. et al. Development of the GerdQ, a tool for the diagnosis and management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009; 30: 1030-1038
• 13 Japan Esophageal Society. Descriptive Rules for Achalasia of the Esophagus, 4th Edition. Esophagus 2017; 14: 275-289
• 14 Woltman TA, Pellegrini CA, Oelschlager BK. Achalasia. Surg Clin North Am 2005; 85: 483-493
• 15 Chandan S, Mohan BP, Chandan OC. et al. Clinical efficacy of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for spastic esophageal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2020; 34: 707-718
• 16 Pasricha PJ, Hawari R, Ahmed I. et al. Submucosal endoscopic esophageal myotomy: a novel experimental approach for the treatment of achalasia. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 761-764
• 17 Chone A, Familiari P, von Rahden B. et al. Multicenter evaluation of clinical efficacy and safety of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2019; 69: 523-527
• 18 Sanaka MR, Chadalavada P, Alomari M. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy is a safe and effective treatment modality for geriatric patients with achalasia. Esophagus 2020; 17: 484-491
• 19 Hu JW, Li QL, Zhou PH. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for advanced achalasia with sigmoid-shaped esophagus: long-term outcomes from a prospective, single-center study. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 2841-2850
• 20 Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Sayyed M. et al. Comparison of short versus long esophageal myotomy in cases with idiopathic achalasia: a randomized controlled trial. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020;
• 21 Khashab MA, Sanaei O, Rivory J. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: anterior versus posterior approach: a randomized single-blinded clinical trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: 288-297, e287
• 22 Oude Nijhuis RAB, Prins LI, Mostafavi N. et al. Factors associated with achalasia treatment outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18: 1442-1453
• 23 Ren Y, Tang X, Chen Y. et al. Pre-treatment Eckardt score is a simple factor for predicting one-year peroral endoscopic myotomy failure in patients with achalasia. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 3234-3241
• 24 Liu ZQ, Li QL, Chen WF. et al. The effect of prior treatment on clinical outcomes in patients with achalasia undergoing peroral endoscopic myotomy. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 307-316
• 25 Kumbhari V, Tieu AH, Onimaru M. et al. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) vs laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) for the treatment of Type III achalasia in 75 patients: a multicenter comparative study. Endosc Int Open 2015; 3: E195-E201
• 26 Nabi Z, Ramchandani M, Kotla R. et al. Gastroesophageal reflux disease after peroral endoscopic myotomy is unpredictable, but responsive to proton pump inhibitor therapy: a large, single-center study. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 643-651
• 27 Kumbhari V, Familiari P, Bjerregaard NC. et al. Gastroesophageal reflux after peroral endoscopic myotomy: a multicenter case-control study. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 634-642
• 28 Grimes KL, Bechara R, Shimamura Y. et al. Gastric myotomy length affects severity but not rate of post-procedure reflux: 3-year follow-up of a prospective randomized controlled trial of double-scope per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Surg Endosc 2020; 34: 2963-2968
• 29 Wang XH, Tan YY, Zhu HY. et al. Full-thickness myotomy is associated with higher rate of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22: 9419-9426
• 30 Mota RCL, de Moura EGH, de Moura DTH. et al. Risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux after POEM for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2020;