Endoscopy 2023; 55(07): 591-598
DOI: 10.1055/a-2030-4158
Original article

Endoscopic removal of lumen-apposing metal stents – risk factors for stent embedment, complex removals, and adverse events: analysis from a multicenter prospective case series

Authors

  • Sergio Bazaga

     1   Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
     2   Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • Francisco Javier García-Alonso

     1   Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
  • Jose Ramon Aparicio Tormo

     3   Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
  • Belen Martinez Moreno

     3   Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
  • Vicente Sanchiz

     4   Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
  • Carles Suria

     4   Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
  • Albert Garcia-Sumalla

     5   Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • Joan B. Gornals

     5   Endoscopy Unit, Department of Digestive Diseases, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • Carlos Chavarría

     1   Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
  • Carme Loras

     6   Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitari Mútua Terrassa, Fundació per la Recerca Mútua Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
     7   Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Spain
  • Francisco Jose García-Fernandez

     8   Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
  • Álvaro Terán

     9   Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain
  • Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros

    10   Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
  • Rafael Pedraza Sanz

    11   Hospital General Universitario de Castellón, Castellón, Spain
  • Leticia Pérez-Carazo

    12   Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain
  • José Carlos Súbtil

    13   Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, University of Navarra Clinic, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  • Antonio Pérez-Millan

    14   Hospital General Río Carrión, Palencia, Spain
  • Francisco Uceda Porta

    15   Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Alicante, Spain
  • Victoria Busto Bea

    16   Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
  • Carlos de la Serna-Higuera

     1   Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
  • Isabel Pinto Garcia

    17   Hospital Regional de Málaga, Málaga, Spain
  • Juan Colán-Hernández

    18   Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
  • Carlos Huertas

    19   Hospital Universitari de Girona Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
  • Carlos Guarner-Argente

    20   Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • Manuel Perez-Miranda

     1   Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
  • RNPAL (Registro nacional de prótesis de aposición luminal [national lumen-apposing metal stent registry]) study group
Trial Registration: EU Clinical Trials Register (https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu) Registration number (trial ID): NCT04059926 Type of study: Prospective multicenter study

Abstract

Background Removing lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) may be difficult and even harmful, but these features have seldom been analyzed. We aimed to generate a comprehensive assessment of the feasibility and safety of LAMS retrieval procedures.

Methods A prospective multicenter case series including all technically successfully deployed LAMSs between January 2019 and January 2020 that underwent endoscopic stent removal. All retrieval-related data were prospectively recorded using standardized telephone questionnaires as part of centralized follow-up that ended after stent removal had been performed. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the potential risk factors for complex removal.

Results For the 407 LAMSs included, removal was attempted in 158 (38.8 %) after an indwell time of 46.5 days (interquartile range [IQR] 31–70). The median (IQR) removal time was 2 (1–4) minutes. Removal was labelled as complex in 13 procedures (8.2 %), although advanced endoscopic maneuvers were required in only two (1.3 %). Complex removal risk factors were stent embedment (relative risk [RR] 5.84, 95 %CI 2.14–15.89; P = 0.001), over-the-wire deployment (RR 4.66, 95 %CI 1.60–13.56; P = 0.01), and longer indwell times (RR 1.14, 95 %CI 1.03–1.27; P = 0.01). Partial and complete embedment were observed in 14 (8.9 %) and five cases (3.2 %), respectively. The embedment rate during the first 6 weeks was 3.1 % (2/65), reaching 15.9 % (10/63) during the following 6 weeks (P = 0.02). The adverse event rate was 5.1 %, including seven gastrointestinal bleeds (5 mild, 2 moderate).

Conclusions LAMS removal is a safe procedure, mostly requiring basic endoscopic techniques attainable in conventional endoscopy rooms. Referral to advanced endoscopy units should be considered for stents with known embedment or long indwell times, which may require more technically demanding procedures.



Publication History

Received: 31 August 2022

Accepted after revision: 23 January 2023

Article published online:
07 March 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany