Endoscopy 2024; 56(04): 249-257
DOI: 10.1055/a-2219-3179
Original article

Lumen-apposing metal stents for the treatment of pancreatic and peripancreatic fluid collections and bleeding risk: a propensity matched study

 1   Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
 2   Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
,
 3   Gastroenterology, AJG Hospitals, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, India
,
 4   Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Francesco Auriemma
 1   Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
,
Jorge Vargas-Madrigal
 5   Gastroenterology Department, Enrique Baltodano Briceno Hospital, Liberia, Costa Rica
,
 6   Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Istituto Scientifico Universitario San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
,
Carmelo Barbera
 7   Gastroenterology Unit, Civil Hospital Giuseppe Mazzini, Teramo, Italy
,
Hazem Ashhab
 8   Gastroenterology, Ahli Hospital, Hebron, Palestine, State of
,
Tae Jun Song
 9   Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, Songpa-gu, Korea (the Republic of)
,
10   Bergen Research group for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (BRAGE), Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
,
11   Division of Upper Gastrointestinal and Metabolic Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
,
Jong Ho Moon
12   Internal Medicine, Soon Chung Hyang University School of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea (the Republic of)
,
Stefano Francesco Crinò
13   Gastroenterology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
,
14   Division of Hospital and Ambulatory Medicine, and Pancreas Research Unit, Department of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
,
Giovanni Aragona
15   Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy
,
Mark A. De Lusong
16   Interventional Endoscopy, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
,
Jahnvi Dhar
 4   Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Andrew Ofosu
17   Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States
,
Agostino Ventra
18   Gastroenterology, Azienda Ospedaliera Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy
,
 1   Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
,
Gianluca Franchellucci
19   Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
,
Alessandro Repici
 2   Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
19   Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
,
Alberto Larghi
20   Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
,
21   Gastroenterology, University of Foggia Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Foggia, Italy
,
PFC LAMS study group
› Author Affiliations


Preview

Abstract

Introduction Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) using the Hot-Axios device has recently been associated with a significant risk of bleeding. This adverse event (AE) seems to occur less frequently with the use of a different device, the Spaxus stent. The aim of the current study was to compare the rates of bleeding between the two stents.

Methods Patients admitted for treatment of PFCs by EUS plus lumen-apposing metal stent in 18 endoscopy referral centers between 10 July 2019 and 28 February 2022 were identified and their outcomes compared using a propensity-matching analysis.

Results 363 patients were evaluated. After a 1-to-1 propensity score match, 264 patients were selected (132 per group). The technical and clinical success rates were comparable between the two groups. Significantly more bleeding requiring transfusion and/or intervention occurred in the Hot-Axios group than in the Spaxus group (6.8% vs. 1.5%; P = 0.03); stent type was a significant predictor of bleeding in both univariate and multivariate regression analyses (P = 0.03 and 0.04, respectively). Bleeding necessitating arterial embolization did not however differ significantly between the two groups (3.0% vs. 0%; P = 0.12). In addition, the Hot-Axios was associated with a significantly higher rate of overall AEs compared with the Spaxus stent (9.8% vs. 3.0%; P = 0.04).

Conclusion Our study showed that, in patients with PFCs, bleeding requiring transfusion and/or intervention occurred significantly more frequently with use of the Hot-Axios stent than with the Spaxus stent, although this was not the case for bleeding requiring embolization.

Supplementary material



Publication History

Received: 07 January 2023

Accepted after revision: 23 October 2024

Article published online:
18 January 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany