Endoscopy 2011; 43(1): 67-69
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256070
Case report/series

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Use of a plastic endoprosthesis to successfully treat esophageal perforation following radiofrequency ablation of Barrett’s esophagus

B.  Vahabzadeh1 , A.  Rastogi1 , A.  Bansal1 , P.  Sharma1
  • 1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted 7 October 2011

accepted after revision 8 October 2011

Publikationsdatum:
13. Januar 2011 (online)

Preview

Introduction

Barrett’s esophagus is a condition defined by the transformation of normal esophageal squamous epithelium to columnar epithelium containing goblet cells, known as intestinal metaplasia [1]. Barrett’s esophagus is a known precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma, a condition with increasing incidence [2] [3]. Abnormal histologic changes in nondysplastic intestinal metaplasia may develop progressively, resulting in low grade dysplasia (LGD) or high grade dysplasia (HGD), prior to transforming into adenocarcinoma [4] [5]. The progression to cancer is higher with HGD as opposed to nondysplastic Barrett’s esophagus or LGD [6]. As a result, this population has been targeted for endoscopic therapy in attempts to minimize the risk of cancer. Traditionally, treatment of these patients has been esophagectomy with reported risk of mortality estimated between 3 % and 4 %, even in experienced centers [7]. As such, less invasive endoscopic eradication therapies (EETs) have become increasingly popular, particularly for patients who are not good surgical candidates due to significant co-morbities, and more frequently as an alternative treatment for those who want to avoid esophagectomy. One such modality is endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA), which has been shown to be effective in eradicating dysplastic changes in Barrett’s esophagus [8]. Unfortunately, serious adverse outcomes of endoscopic therapy include bleeding, esophageal stricture and, less frequently, perforation [9]. However, if identified early, these events can be managed successfully during endoscopy. We present a case of esophageal perforation following EET.

References

B. VahabzadehMD 

Kansas University Medical Center – Gastroenterology

3901 Rainbow Blvd, Mailstop 1023
Kansas City
Kansas 66160
USA

Fax: +1-913-588-3975

eMail: bvahabzadeh@kumc.edu