Endoscopy 2016; 48(03): 281-285
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1393241
Innovations and brief communications
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Impact of the clip and snare method using the prelooping technique for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Shinya Yamada
Department of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
,
Hisashi Doyama
Department of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
,
Ryosuke Ota
Department of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
,
Yasuhito Takeda
Department of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
,
Kunihiro Tsuji
Department of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
,
Shigetsugu Tsuji
Department of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
,
Naohiro Yoshida
Department of Gastroenterology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted 06. Dezember 2014

accepted after revision 18. August 2015

Publikationsdatum:
30. Oktober 2015 (online)

Preview

Background and study aim: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is more difficult to perform for colorectal tumors, but the use of traction to facilitate direct submucosal layer visualization is a promising method to reduce procedure times and complication rates. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the clip and snare method (CSM) with a prelooping technique (PLT) for colorectal tumors.

Patients and methods: A total of 140 colorectal tumors were treated: 17 using the CSM with PLT; 123, used as controls, by standard ESD without these techniques. Therapeutic efficacy and safety were retrospectively assessed.

Results: All tumors were successfully resected en bloc using the CSM with PLT. Multisegment resection was found in four tumors in the control group. There was a significant difference in the procedure time between the patients in the CSM with PLT group and the control group (45.6 vs. 70.1 minutes; P = 0.047). There were no significant differences in the complication rates (5.9 % vs. 8.1 %; P = 1.00).

Conclusions: The CSM with PLT was effective and safe in this study.