Failure to Provide Clinicians Useful IT Systems: Opportunities to Leapfrog Current Technologies

M. J. Ball; J. S. Silva; S. Bierstock; J. V. Douglas; A. F. Norcio; J. Chakraborty; J. Srini

doi:10.1055/s-0038-1625125

Methods of Information in Medicine, Table of Contents

Methods Inf Med 2008; 47(01): 4-7
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1625125

For Discussion

Schattauer GmbH

Failure to Provide Clinicians Useful IT Systems: Opportunities to Leapfrog Current Technologies

Authors

M. J. Ball

¹IBM Research Center for Healthcare Management and Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
J. S. Silva

²National Cancer Institute, Center for Bioinformatics, Eldersburg, MD, USA
S. Bierstock

³Founder & Principal, Champions in Healthcare, Delray Beach, FL, USA
J. V. Douglas

⁴Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
A. F. Norcio

⁵University of Maryland (UMBC), Department of Information Systems, Baltimore, MD, USA
J. Chakraborty

⁵University of Maryland (UMBC), Department of Information Systems, Baltimore, MD, USA
J. Srini

⁶University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Abstract

Summary

Objective: To discuss why clinical information systems are failing.

Method: Subjectively analyzing the development of clinical IT systems during the last decades.

Results and Conclusions: The challenge is to anticipate what information clinicians need and then deliver it in a way that is tailored for their unique views. Clinicians need workstations that offer the highest level possible of user-determined flexibility and customization. We envision and outline a so-called point of care work station, automatically scaling to the display, hardware capacity, operating system, applications (local or distributed) the user needs and across diverse health IT systems.

Keywords

Clinical workstations - health professional workstations

Full Text

References

References
1 Institute of Medicine (IOM). Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001
2 iHealthBeat, July 27, 2007. United States Trails Other Countries in Health IT Adoption. www.ihealthbeat.org. Last access December 1, 2007
3 American Hospital Association. 2007 Continued Progress: Hospital Use of Information Technology.
4 Ball MJ, Douglas JV. Human Factors: Changing Systems, Changing Behaviors: Toward Healthe- People. New York: Springer; 2005. pp 60-70.
5 Martin JB. March 29, 2007. Digital Doctoring. Boston Globe. www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped. Last access December 1, 2007
6 Campbell EM, Sitting DF, Ash JS, Guappone KP, Dykstra RH. Types of unintended consequences relation to computerized provider order entry. JAMIA 2006; 13 (05) 547-556.
7 Weiner JP, Kfuri T, Chan K, Fowle JB. June 2007 “e-Iatrogenesis”: The Most Critical Unintended Consequence of CPOE and other HIT. JAMIA 2007; 14 (03) 387-388.
8 Mahotra S, Jordan D, Shortliffe E, Patel VL. Epub 2006 June 9 Workflow modeling in critical care: piecing together your own puzzle. J Biomed Inform 2007; 40 (02) 81-92.
9 Horsky J, Gutnik L, Patel VL. 2006 Technology for emergency care: cognitive and workflow considerations. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006; 344-348.
10 Cohen T, Blatter B, Almedia C, Shortliffe E, Patel V. A cognitive blueprint of collaboration in context: distributed cognition in the psychiatric emergcncy department. Artif Intell Med 2006; 37 (02) 73-83. Epub 2006 May 30.
11 Forrester Research, as reported by Chin T 2003 Doctors outpace consumers in embracing e-technologies. AMNews. www.ama-assn.org/sci-pubs/amnews.
12 PricewaterhouseCoopers research cited on iHealthBeat. 2003 More physicians have highspeed internet access. www.ihealthbeat.org.
13 Egan C. May 11, 2007 Mobile, MD: Wired Doctors Bringing Technology to Treatment. Interview on Manhattan Research survey of 1,353 physicians, Taking the Pulse: US – Physicians and Emerging Information Technologies, published in iHealthBeat. www.ihealthbeat.org.
14 Schuerenberg PK. 2007 Technology integration at the point of care. Health Data Management. www.healthdatamanagement.com/htlm/current/CurrentIssueStory
15 Christensen CM, Raynor ME. The Innovator’s Solution: Creating and Sustaing Successful Growth. Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation; 2003
16 Blois SM. The Physician’s Personal Workstation. MD Computing 1985; 2 (05) 22-26.
17 Bierstock SR. December 6, 2004 “Thoughtflow” versus “Workflow”. For Your Advantage (23). Last access December 1, 2007.
18 Bierstock SR. Physician absorption by technology: the end of the physician adoption issue. Healthcare Informatics 2007 (publication pending).
19 Ball MR, Bierstock SR. Clinician Use of Enabling Technology: The Missing Link. Journal of Healthcare Information Management. 2007 21 (3).
20 E-Health Insider, July 10, 2007 Granger says he is ‘ashamed’ of some systems provided. www.e-health-insider.com/news/item.cfm?ID=2854. Last access December 1, 2007.
21 Silva JS, Ball MJ. The professional workstation as enabler: conference recommendations International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing. Special Issue on The Health Care Professional Workstation 1994; 34: 3-10.
22 Patil RS, Silva JS, Swartout WR. An architecture for a health care provider’s workstation International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing. Special Issue on The Health Care Professional Workstation 1994; 34: 285-299.
23 Norcio AF, Stanley J. Adaptive Human-Computer Interfaces: A Literature Survey and Perspective. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1989; 19 (02) 399-408.
24 Getek R. Adaptive Interfaces Literature Review. Unpublished work done in partial completion of requirements of the doctoral program in the Department of Information Systems, University of Maryland (UMBC). 2007
25 Yeo A. Cultural user interfaces: a silver lining in cultural diversity. SIGCHI Bulletin 1996; 28 (03) 4-7.
26 Lehmann CU, Altuwaijri MM, Li YC, Ball MJ, Haux R. Translational Research in Medical Informatics or from Theory to Practice – A Call for an Applied Informatics Journal. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47: 1-3.