Background and Study Aims: A new technique has been described which combines abdominal helical computed tomography (CT) scanning and virtual reality computer technology, known as virtual colonoscopy (VC); the reconstructed images provide a simulation of the interior of the colon as viewed by endoscopy. We compared VC with conventional colonoscopy in patients with suspected or known colonic neoplasia.
Patients and Methods: A total of 38 patients, in whom there was a high likelihood of colonic polyps or cancer, underwent a noncontrast helical CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis after regular colonoscopy bowel preparation.The images were reconstructed into a VC presentation and compared with the subsequent conventional colonoscopy in a blinded manner.
Results: Conventional colonoscopy identified a total of 24 polyps 5 mm or greater. VC correctly identified five of 13 polyps 5 - 9 mm in size, and ten of 11 lesions greater than or equal to 10 mm in diameter. The reasons for four missed lesions were identified as being secondary to a collapsed rectum in two patients and stool in the right colon in two patients. The sensitivity and specificity per patient of VC for lesions greater than or equal to 5 mm were 66.7 % and 75.0 % respectively, and for lesions greater than 1 cm were 90.0 % and 82.1 %, respectively.
Conclusions: Virtual colonoscopy is feasible, well tolerated, and capable of detecting most lesions greater than 10 mm in diameter. This technique is continuing to be developed and warrants further evaluation as a diagnostic and screening tool in colorectal neoplasia.
References
1
Wingo P A, Tong T, Bolden B.
Cancer Statistics, 1995.
Cancer Journal Clinics.
1995;
45
8-13
2
Stryker S J, Wolff B G, Culp C E, et al.
Natural history of untreated colonic polyps.
Gastroenterology.
1987;
93
1009-1013
3
Hardcastle J D, Thomas W M, Chamberlain J, et al.
Randomized controlled trial of fecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer: results for first 107 349 subjects.
Lancet.
1989;
111
60-64
4
Kewenter R J, Bjork S, Haglind E, et al.
Screening and rescreening for colorectal cancer: a controlled trial of fecal occult blood testing in 27 700 subjects.
Cancer.
1988;
62
645-651
5
Day J J, Freeman A H, Coni N K, Dixon A K.
Barium enema or computed tomography for the frail elderly patient?.
Clin Radiol.
1993;
48
48-51
6
Amin Z, Boulos P B, Lees W R.
Technical report: spiral CT pneumocolon for suspected colonic neoplasms.
Clin Radiol.
1996;
51
56-61
7
Hara A K, Johnson C D, Reed J E, et al.
Detection of colorectal polyps by computed tomographic colography: feasibility of a novel technique.
Gastroenterology.
1996;
110
284-290
8 Vining D J, Gelfand D W. Non-invasive colonoscopy using helical CT scanning, 3D reconstruction, and virtual reality. Presented at the Society of Gastrointestinal Radiologists' Annual Meeting. Maui, HI; February 1994
9
Vining D J, Teigen L, Stelt S D.
Virtual colonoscopy: a 60-second colon examination (abstract).
Radiology.
1995;
197
281
10
Fenlon H M, Ferruci J T.
Virtual colonoscopy: what will the issues be?.
Am J Roentgenol.
1997;
169
453-458
11 Teigen E, Vining D J, McCorquodale D. Improving virtual colonoscopy with a fecal contrast agent. Presented at the Society of Gastrointestinal Radiologists' Annual Meeting. Cancun, Mexico; March 1997
12
Royster A P, Fenlon H M, Clarke P D, et al.
CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation.
Am J Roentgenol.
1997;
169
1237-1242
13
Ferruci J T.
Screening for colon cancer: programs of the American College of Radiology.
Am J Roentgenol.
1993;
160
999-1003
14
Rex D K, Cutler C S, Lemmel G T, et al.
Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.
Gastroenterology.
1997;
112
24-28
15
Morales T G, Sampliner R E, Garewal H S, et al.
The difference in colon polyp size before and after removal.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1996;
43 (1)
25-28
16
Gopalswamy N, Shenoy V N, Choudrhry U, et al.
Is in vivo measurement of polyps during colonoscopy accurate?.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1997;
46 (6)
497-502
17
Hara A K, Johnson C D, Reed J E, et al.
Reducing data size and radiation dose for CT colonography.
Am J Roentgenol.
1997;
168
1181-1184
18
Vining D J.
Virtual endoscopy: is it reality?.
Radiology.
1996;
200
30-31
19
Kay C L, Evangelou H A.
A review of the technical and clinical aspects of virtual endoscopy.
Endoscopy.
1996;
28
768-775
20
American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal cancer and polyps.
Update 1997.
Cancer.
1997;
47
154-160
21
Hermanek P.
Dysplasia-carcinoma sequence, types of adenomas and early colorectal carcinoma.
Eur J Surg Oncol.
1987;
13
141-143
22
Shinya H, Wolff W I.
Morphology, anatomic distribution and cancer potential of colonic polyps.
Ann Surg.
1979;
190
679-683
23
Hofstad B, Vatn M H, Andersen I, et al.
Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years.
Gut.
1996;
39
449-456
24
Kay C L, Aabakken L, Evangelou H, et al.
Virtual colonoscopy - a pig model for optimization of study parameters (abstract).
Am J Gastroenterol.
1996;
91
349
25
Dachman A H, Lieberman J, Osnis R B, et al.
Small simulated polyps in pig colon: sensitivity of CT virtual colography.
Radiology.
1997;
203
427-430
26
Luboldt W, Bauerfeind D P, Steiner P, Fried M, et al.
Preliminary assessment of three dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders.
Lancet.
1997;
349
1288-1291
27
Schoenenberger A W, Bauerfeind D P, Krestin G, Debatin G F.
Virtual colonoscopy with magnetic resonance imaging: in vitro evaluation of a new concept.
Gastroenterology.
1997;
112
1863-1870
28
Springer P, Dessl A, Giacomuzzi S M, et al.
Viral computed tomographic gastroscopy: a new technique.
Endoscopy.
1997;
29
632-634
29
Morrin M M, Kruskal J B, Farrell R J, et al.
Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy.
Am J Roentgenol.
1999;
172
913-918
30
Macari M, Berman P, Dicker M, et al.
Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy.
Am J Roentgenol.
1999;
173
561-564
F.R.C.R. M.R.C.P. C. L. Kay
Dept. of Radiology Bradford Royal Infirmary
Duckworth Lane
Bradford BD9 6RJ
United Kingdom
Telefon: +44-113-230/722
eMail: kaycl44@hotmail.com