Video Capsule Endoscopy in Small-bowel Malignancy: A Multicenter Belgian Study

Background and Study Aims: Early diagnosis of small-bowel tumors is crucial for therapy. Video capsule endoscopy has improved the diagnosis of small-bowel diseases, but data concerning the role of this technique in detecting small-bowel malignancy are scarce. The aim of this paper was to review all capsule endoscopy findings at Belgian hospitals, in order to evaluate the diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy in the field of small-bowel malignancy.
Patients and Methods: For this retrospective study, the seven Belgian academic hospitals where the device was being used were asked to review the findings obtained by means of video capsule endoscopy, and to collect information about the cases of small-bowel malignancy.
Results: In total, 443 capsule endoscopies were performed up to November 2004, and 11 malignant small-bowel processes were detected (2.5 %). The most frequent indications for performing capsule endoscopy in those 11 cases were intestinal bleeding of undefined origin or iron-deficiency anemia. The mean number of diagnostic procedures performed before capsule endoscopy was 3.6. The capsule endoscopy results had a diagnostic yield of 1.6 % after classical work-up. In 55 % of these cases, capsule endoscopy findings had an influence on therapy.
Conclusions: Tumors of the small bowel remain a rare condition. Video capsule endoscopy is able to detect tumors undiagnosed by classical procedures in about 1.6 % of cases and has an impact on the therapy in 55 % of the tumor cases.

References

• 1 Ell C, Remke S, May A. et al . The first prospective controlled trial comparing wireless capsule endoscopy with push enteroscopy in chronic gastrointestinal bleeding.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 685-689
• 2 Eliakim R. Wireless capsule video endoscopy: three years of experience.  World J Gastroenterol. 2004;  10 1238-1239
• 3 Costamagna G, Shah S K, Riccioni M E. et al . A prospective trial comparing small bowel radiographs and video capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel disease.  Gastroenterology. 2002;  123 999-1005
• 4 Eliakim R, Fischer D, Suissa A. et al . Wireless capsule video endoscopy is a superior diagnostic tool compared to barium follow through and CT in patients with suspected Crohn’s disease.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;  15 363-367
• 5 Maieron A, Hubner D, Blaha B. et al . Multicenter retrospective evaluation of capsule endoscopy in clinical routine.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 864-868
• 6 Madisch A, Schimming W, Kinzel F. et al . Locally advanced adenocarcinoma missed primarily by capsule endoscopy but diagnosed by push enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 861-864
• 7 Landi B, Cellier C, Gaudric M. et al . Long-term outcome of patients with gastro-intestinal bleeding of obscure origin explored by push enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 355-359
• 8 Maglinte D D, Kelvin F M, O’Connor K. et al . Current status of small-bowel radiography.  Abdom Imaging. 1996;  21 247-257
• 9 de Mascarenhas-Saraiva M N, da Silva Araujo Lopes L M. Small-bowel tumors diagnosed by wireless capsule endoscopy: report of five cases.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 865-868
• 10 De Franchis R, Rondonotti E, Abbiati C. et al . Small-bowel malignancy.  Gastrointest Endoscop Clin N Am. 2004;  14 139-148
• 11 Schwartz G D, Barkin J S. Small bowel tumors detected by M₂A® capsule endoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  99 Suppl A191
• 12 Delvaux M, Fassler I, Gay G. Clinical usefulness of the endoscopic video capsule as the initial intestinal investigation in patients with obscure digestive bleeding: validation of a diagnostic strategy based on the patient outcome after 2 months.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 1067-1073
• 13 Pennazio M, Santucci R, Rondonotti E. et al . Outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy: report of 100 consecutive cases.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  126 643-653