Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2018; 06(08): E998-E1007
DOI: 10.1055/a-0579-9050
Review
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018

ESD versus EMR in non-ampullary superficial duodenal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles
1   Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
,
Lucille Quénéhervé
2   Institut des Maladies de l’Appareil digestif, University Hospital of Nantes, France
,
Walter Margos
1   Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
,
Tom G. Moreels
1   Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
,
Ralph Yeung
1   Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
,
Hubert Piessevaux
1   Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
,
Emmanuel Coron
2   Institut des Maladies de l’Appareil digestif, University Hospital of Nantes, France
,
Anne Jouret-Mourin
3   Department of Pathology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
,
Pierre H. Deprez
1   Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 19 September 2017

accepted after revision 02 February 2018

Publication Date:
03 August 2018 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been developed as an option for treatment of esophageal, gastric and colorectal lesions. However, there is no consensus on the role of ESD in duodenal tumors.

Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis compared ESD and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in sporadic non-ampullary superficial duodenal tumors (NASDTs), including local experience. We conducted a search in PubMed, Scopus and the Cochrane library up to August 2017 to identify studies that compared both techniques reporting at least one main outcome (en-bloc/complete resection, local recurrence). Pooled outcomes were calculated under fixed and random-effect models. Subgroup analyses were conducted.

Results A total of 753 patients presenting with 784 NASDTs (242 ESD, 542 EMR) in 14 studies were included. Tumor size (MD: 5.88, [CI95 %: 2.15, 9.62], P = 0.002, I2 = 79 %) and procedure time (MD: 65.65, [CI95 %: 40.39, 90.92], P < 0.00001, I2 = 88 %) were greater in the ESD group. En-bloc resection rate was significantly higher in Asian studies (OR: 2.16 [CI95 %: 1.15, 4.08], P = 0.02, I2: 46 %). ESD provided a higher complete resection rate (OR: 1.63 [I95 %: 1.06, 2.50], P = 0.03, I2: 59 %), but there was no risk difference in the risk of local recurrence (RD: – 0.03 [CI95 %: – 0.07, 0.01], P = 0.15, I2: 0 %) or delayed bleeding. ESD was associated with an increased number of intraoperative perforations [RD: 0.12 (CI95 %: 0.04, 0.20), P = 0.002, I2: 56 %] and emergency surgery for delayed perforations. The inclusion of eligible studies was limited to retrospective series with inequalities in comparative groups.

Conclusions Duodenal ESD for NASDTs may achieve higher en-bloc and complete resections at the expense of a greater perforation rate compared to EMR. The impact on local recurrence remains uncertain.

 

  • References

  • 1 Bhatt A, Abe S, Kumaravel A. et al. Indications and Techniques for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 784-791
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Deprez PH, Bergman JJ, Meisner S. et al. Current practice with endoscopic submucosal dissection in Europe: position statement from a panel of experts. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 853-858
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 ASGE Technology Committee. Maple JT, Abu Dayyeh BK. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 1311-1325
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Shibagaki K, Ishimura N, Kinoshita Y. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for duodenal tumors. Ann Transl Med 2017; 5: 188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Yamamoto H, Miura Y. Duodenal ESD: conquering difficulties. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2014; 24: 235-244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ponchon T. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 829-854
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Navaneethan U, Hasan MK, Lourdusamy V. et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection of non-ampullary duodenal polyps: a systematic review. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E699-E708
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kakushima N, Kanemoto H, Tanaka M. et al. Treatment for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 21: 12501-12508
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005; 5: 13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hoteya S, Furuhata T, Takahito T. et al. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Non-Ampullary Superficial Duodenal Tumor. Digestion 2017; 95: 36-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Park SM, Ham JH, Kim BW. et al. Feasibility of endoscopic resection for sessile nonampullary duodenal tumors: a multicenter retrospective study. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015; 2015: 692492
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Nonaka S, Oda I, Tada K. et al. Clinical outcome of endoscopic resection for nonampullary duodenal tumors. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 129-135
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Matsumoto S, Yoshida Y. Selection of appropriate endoscopic therapies for duodenal tumors: an open-label study, single-center experience. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 14: 8624-8630
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Yamamoto Y, Yoshizawa N, Tomida H. et al. Therapeutic outcomes of endoscopic resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumor. Dig Endosc 2014; 26: 50-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Seo JY, Hong SJ, Han JP. et al. Usefulness and safety of endoscopic treatment for nonampullary duodenal adenoma and adenocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014; 29: 1692-1698
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Honda T, Yamamoto H, Osawa H. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial duodenal neoplasms. Dig Endosc 2009; 21: 270-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Inoue T, Uedo N, Yamashina T. et al. Delayed perforation: a hazardous complication of endoscopic resection for non-ampullary duodenal neoplasm. Dig Endosc 2014; 26: 220-227
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kakushima N, Ono H, Takao T. et al. Method and timing of resection of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors. Dig Endosc 2014; 26: 35-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Endo M, Abiko Y, Oana S. et al. Usefulness of endoscopic treatment for duodenal adenoma. Dig Endosc 2010; 22: 360-365
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Zhong YS, Shi Q, Wu HF. et al. Endoscopic resection for the treatment of duodenal Brunner's adenoma. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2012; 22: 904-909
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Basford PJ, George R, Nixon E. et al. Endoscopic resection of sporadic duodenal adenomas: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) techniques and the risks of late delayed bleeding. Surg Endosc 2014; 28: 1594-1600
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Teoh AY, Chiu PW, Chan SY. et al. Hospital Authority audit of the outcome of endoscopic resection of superficial upper gastro-intestinal lesions in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 2015; 21: 224-231
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Pérez-Cuadrado Robles E, Quénéhervé L, Margos W. et al. En-bloc resection may not be the main goal in large duodenal adenomas. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6: E1008-E1014
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Barret M, Lepilliez V, Coumaros D. et al. The expansion of endoscopic submucosal dissection in France: A prospective nationwide survey. United Europ Gastroenterol J 2017; 5: 45-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Shibagaki K, Ishimura N, Kinoshita Y. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for duodenal tumors. Ann Transl Med 2017; 5: 188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Miura Y, Shinozaki S, Hayashi Y. et al. Duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection is feasible using the pocket-creation method. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 8-14
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ichikawa D, Komatsu S, Dohi O. et al. Laparoscopic and endoscopic co-operative surgery for non-ampullary duodenal tumors. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 21: 10424-10431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Irino T, Nunobe S, Hiki N. et al. Laparoscopic-endoscopic cooperative surgery for duodenal tumors: a unique procedure that helps ensure the safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 349-351
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Navaneethan U, Hasan MK, Lourdusamy V. et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection of non-ampullary duodenal polyps: a systematic review. Endosc Int Open 2016; 4: E699-E708
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Marques J, Baldaque-Silva F, Pereira P. et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of sporadic nonampullary duodenal adenomatous polyps. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 25: 720-727
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Jung JH, Choi KD, Ahn JY. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for sessile, nonampullary duodenal adenomas. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 133-135
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar