Galactography with Tomosynthesis Technique (Galactomosynthesis) – Renaissance of a Method?

Abstract

Introduction For decades, conventional galactography was the only imaging technique capable of showing the mammary ducts. Today, diagnosis is based on a multimodal concept which combines high-resolution ultrasound with magnetic resonance (MR) mammography and ductoscopy/galactoscopy and has a sensitivity and specificity of up to 95%. This study used tomosynthesis in galactography for the first time and compared the synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms generated with this technique with the images created using the established method of ductal sonography. Both methods should be able to detect invasive breast cancers and their precursors such as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as well as being able to identify benign findings.

Material and Methods Five patients with pathological nipple discharge were examined using ductal sonography, contrast-enhanced 3D galactography with tomosynthesis and the synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms generated with the latter method. Evaluation of the images created with the different imaging modalities was done by three investigators with varying levels of experience with complementary breast diagnostics (1, 5 and 15 years), and their evaluations were compared with the histological findings.

Results All 3 investigators independently evaluated the images created with ductal sonography, contrast-enhanced 3D galactography with tomosynthesis, and generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms. Their evaluations were compared with the histopathological assessment of the surgical specimens resected from the 5 patients. There was 1 case of invasive breast cancer, 2 cases with ductal carcinoma in situ and 2 cases with benign findings. All 3 investigators made more mistakes when they used the standard imaging technique of ductal sonography to diagnose suspicious lesions than when they used contrast-enhanced galactography with tomosynthesis and the generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms.

Conclusion This is the first time breast tomosynthesis was used in galactography (galactomosynthesis) to create digital 3-dimensional images of suspicious findings. When used together with the generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms, it could be a useful complementary procedure for the diagnosis of breast anomalies and could herald a renaissance of this method. Compared with high-resolution ductal ultrasound, the investigators achieved better results with contrast-enhanced galactography using tomosynthesis and the generated synthetic digital 2D full-field mammograms, as confirmed by histopathological findings.

Key words

breast - galactography - tomosynthesis - galactomosynthesis - ultrasound - MRI

^* Shared lead authorship

• References/Literatur

• 1 Scheurlen K, Schnitzer A, Krammer J. et al. Stellenwert der Galaktographie zur Abklärung pathologischer Sekretion in der komplementären Mammadiagnostik – Teil 1: Eine Onlineumfrage an den deutschen Brustzentren. Radiologe 2014; 54: 63-67
• 2 Scheurlen K, Schnitzer A, Krammer J. et al. Stellenwert der Galaktographie zur Abklärung pathologischer Sekretion in der komplementären Mammadiagnostik – Teil 2: Eine systematische Literaturanalyse. Radiologe 2014; 54: 160-166
• 3 Ciatto S, Bravetti P, Berni D. et al. The role of galactography in the detection of breast cancer. Tumori 1988; 74: 177-181
• 4 Grillo ME, Lehmann-Willenbrock E, Gent HJ. Chromogalactography preceding ductal-lobular unit excision for nipple discharge–with special reference to diagnostic galactography and histology. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1990; 79: 6-9
• 5 Krämer SC, Rieber A, Gorich J. et al. Diagnosis of papillomas of the breast: value of magnetic resonance mammography in comparison with galactography. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 1733-1736
• 6 Dinkel HP, Gassel AM, Müller T. et al. Galactography and exfoliative cytology in women with abnormal nipple discharge. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97: 625-629
• 7 Baitchev G, Gortchev G, Todorova A. et al. Intraductal aspiration cytology and galactography for nipple discharge. Int Surg 2003; 88: 83-86
• 8 Cabioglu N, Hunt KK, Singletary SE. et al. Surgical decision making and factors determining a diagnosis of breast carcinoma in women presenting with nipple discharge. J Am Coll Surg 2003; 196: 354-364
• 9 Funovics MA, Phillipp MO, Lackner B. et al. Galactography: method of choice in pathologic nipple discharge?. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 94-99
• 10 Adepoju LJ, Chun J, El-Tamer M. et al. The value of clinical characteristics and breast-imaging studies in predicting a histopathologic diagnosis of cancer or high-risk lesion in patients with spontaneous nipple discharge. Am J Surg 2005; 190: 644-646
• 11 Hünerbein M, Raubach M, Gebauer B. et al. Ductoscopy and intraductal vacuum assisted biopsy in women with pathologic nipple discharge. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2006; 99: 301-307
• 12 Gray RJ, Pockaj BA, Karstaedt PJ. Navigating murky waters: a modern treatment algorithm for nipple discharge. Am J Surg 2007; 194: 850-854
• 13 Grunwald S, Heyer H, Paepke S. et al. Diagnostic value of ductoscopy in the diagnosis of nipple discharge and intraductal proliferations in comparison to standard methods. Onkologie 2007; 30: 243-248
• 14 Morrogh M, Morris EA, Liberman L. et al. The predictive value of ductography and magnetic resonance imaging in the management of nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol 2007; 14: 3369-3377
• 15 Hamed ST, Abdo MH, Ahmed HH. Breast discharge: ultrasound and Doppler evaluation. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2008; 20: 262-270
• 16 Montroni I, Santini D, Zucchini G. et al. Nipple discharge: is its significance as a risk factor for breast cancer fully understood? Observational study including 915 consecutive patients who underwent selective duct excision. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 123: 895-900
• 17 Grunwald S, Bojahr B, Schwesinger G. et al. Mammary ductoscopy for the evaluation of nipple discharge and comparison with standard diagnostic techniques. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006; 13: 418-423
• 18 Vargas HI, Vargas MP, Eldrageely K. et al. Outcomes of clinical and surgical assessment of women with pathological nipple discharge. Am Surg 2006; 72: 124-128
• 19 Choudhury S, Isomoto I, Hyashi K. Magnetic resonance imaging features of breasts in patients with nipple discharge. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2008; 34: 44-47
• 20 Liu GY, Lu JS, Shen KW. et al. Fiberoptic ductoscopy combined with cytology testing in the patients of spontaneous nipple discharge. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008; 108: 271-277
• 21 Morrogh M, Park A, Elkin EB. et al. Lessons learned from 416 cases of nipple discharge of the breast. Am J Surg 2010; 200: 73-80
• 22 Schwab SA, Uder M, Schulz-Wendtland R. et al. Direct MR galactography: feasibility study. Radiology 2008; 249: 54-61
• 23 Wenkel E, Janka R, Uder M. et al. Does direct MR galactography have the potential to become an alternative diagnostic tool in patients with pathological nipple discharge?. Clin Imaging 2011; 35: 85-93
• 24 Ohlinger R, Stomps A, Paepke S. et al. Ductoscopic detection of intraductal lesions in cases of pathologic nipple discharge in comparison with standard diagnostics: the German multicenter study. Oncol Res Treat 2014; 37: 628-632
• 25 Schulz-Wendtland R, Aichinger U, Krämer S. et al. [Galactoscopy–is it a new interventional method for breast diagnosis?]. Rofo 2002; 174: 1015-1017
• 26 Schulz-Wendtland R, Meier-Meitinger M, Adamietz B. et al. Digitale Galaktoskopie der 2. Generation. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 2011; 71: 255-259
• 27 Schulz-Wendtland R, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA. et al. Tomosynthese. Gynäkol Prax 2015; 39: 521-534
• 28 Choi JS, Han BK, Ko EY. et al. Comparison between two-dimensional synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of T1 breast cancer. Eur Radiol 2016; DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-4083-7.
• 29 S3-Leitlinie Früherkennung, Diagnose, Therapie und Nachsorge des Mammakarzinoms, Version 4.0. 2017. AWMF Registernummer: 032-045OL. Online: http://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/leitlinien/mammakarzinom/ Stand: 12.02.2018
• 30 Rafferty EA, Durand MA, Conant EF. et al. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis and digital mammography in dense and nondense breasts. JAMA 2016; 315: 1784-1786
• 31 Morris EA, Comstock C, Lee C. et al. ACR BI-RADS^™ – Atlas der Mammadiagnostik. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2016