Endosc Int Open 2018; 06(08): E1065-E1069
DOI: 10.1055/a-0640-3123
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills in Endoscopy (GEARS-E): objective assessment tool for master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot

Nobuyoshi Takeshita
1  Department of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
,
Soo Jay Phee
2  School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
,
Philip WaiYan Chiu
3  Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
,
Khek Yu Ho
4  National University Hospital, Singapore
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

submitted 13. Dezember 2017

accepted after revision 30. April 2018

Publikationsdatum:
10. August 2018 (online)

Abstract

Background and study aims The Master and Slave Transluminal Endoscopic Robot (MASTER) is a novel robotic endosurgical system with two operating arms that offer multiple degrees of freedom. We developed a new assessment tool, the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills in Endoscopy (GEARS-E), derived from existing tools in laparoscopic and robotic surgery, and evaluated its utility in the performance of procedures using MASTER.

Methods This was a pilot study conducted in vivo and ex vivo on animals. Three operators (Novice-1, Novice-2 and Expert) performed a total of five endoscopic submucosal dissections (ESD) using MASTER. Novice operators had no MASTER experience and the expert had previously performed eight MASTER ESDs. Operator performance was assessed by four independent evaluators using GEARS-E, which has a maximum score of 25 for five domains representing various skill-related variables (depth perception, bimanual dexterity, efficiency, tissue handling and autonomy).

Results The mean global rating scores for Novice-1 first attempt, Novice-1 second attempt, Novice-2 first attempt, Novice-2 second attempt and Expertʼs cases were 13.0, 16.0, 13.3, 15.5, and 21.5, respectively. The mean scores of each of the five domains were statistically higher for the second attempts compared to the first attempts for both Novice-1 and Novice-2. The mean scores of each of the five domains for the Expertʼs case were consistently higher than those for the two novice operators in both their first and second attempts.

Conclusion Results using GEARS-E showed correlations between surgical experience and MASTER ESD. As an assessment tool for evaluation of surgical skills, GEARS-E has great potential for application in MASTER procedures.