Statement by the OEGGG with Review of the Literature on the Mode of Delivery of Premature Infants at the Limit of Viability

Abstract

In 2017, the Austrian Society for Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine (ÖGKJ) published a guideline on the primary care of premature infants at the limit of viability. In this guideline, it is recommended that a Caesarean section be preferred as mode of delivery with regard to an early preterm birth (22 + 0 – 24 + 6 weeks of pregnancy) due to an allegedly lower perinatal risk of cerebral haemorrhage. In contrast to this, the Austrian Society for Gynaecology and Obstetrics (OEGGG) considers there to be no clinical and scientific basis for this recommendation and the mode of delivery in the case of early preterm birth must be adapted to the individual maternal and foetal clinical situation. The international data available from the generally retrospective investigations show heterogeneous results regarding the mode of delivery. The prospective and randomised data in this regard are insufficient. A Cochrane analysis does not show any advantage in favour of a Caesarean delivery. The German-language guidelines (AWMF and Switzerland) make analogous recommendations for adapting the mode of delivery with regard to an early preterm birth individually to the respective clinical situation. In the case of an early preterm birth and a singleton in cephalic presentation, the OEGGG therefore recommends individual management of the delivery which takes the maternal and foetal clinical situation into account and also includes vaginal delivery as a mode of delivery in the clinical decision process.

Key words

mode of delivery - early preterm birth - pregnancy - perinatal mortality - neonatal morbidity

• References/Literatur

• 1 Berger A, Kiechl-Kohlendorfer U, Berger J. et al. Erstversorgung von Frühgeborenen an der Grenze der Lebensfähigkeit. Monatschr Kinderheilk 2017; 2: 139-147
• 2 Statistik Austria. Lebendgeborene (mit inländischem Geburtsort) nach ausgewählten medizinischen Merkmalen seit 2006: Schwangerschaftsdauer (in Wochen und Tagen). 2017 Online: https://www.statistik.at/web_de/statistiken/menschen_und_gesellschaft/bevoelkerung/geborene/medizinische_und_sozialmedizinische_merkmale/110619.html last access: 11.09.2018
• 3 Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF). S2k-Leitlinie: Frühgeborene an der Grenze der Lebensfähigkeit. AWMF-Leitlinien-Register Nr. 024-019. 2017 Online: https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/024-019l_S2k_Fr%C3%BChgeburt_Grenze_Lebensf%C3%A4higkeit_2014-09-verlaengert.pdf last access: 11.09.2018
• 4 Berger TM, Bernet V, El Alama S. et al. Perinatal care at the limit of viability between 22 and 26 completed weeks of gestation in Switzerland. 2011 revision of the Swiss recommendations. Swiss Med Wkly 2011; 141: w13280
• 5 Alfirevic Z, Milan SJ, Livio S. Caesarean section versus vaginal delivery for preterm birth in singletons. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (09) CD000078
• 6 Racusin DA, Antony KM, Haase J. et al. Mode of delivery in premature neonates: does it matter?. Am J Perinatol Rep 2016; 6: e251-e259
• 7 Ghi T, Maroni E, Arcangeli T. et al. Mode of delivery in the preterm gestation and maternal and neonatal outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2010; 23: 1424-1428
• 8 Werner EF, Han CS, Savitz DA. et al. Health outcomes for vaginal compared with cesarean delivery of appropriately grown preterm neonates. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121: 1195-1200
• 9 Berger R, Papadopoulos G, Maul H. Entbindungsweg bei Frühgeburt. Frauenarzt 2016; 57: 748-753
• 10 Malloy MH. Impact of cesarean section on neonatal mortality rates among very preterm infants in the United States, 2000–2003. Pediatrics 2008; 122: 285-292
• 11 Muhuri PK, Macdorman MF, Menacker F. Method of delivery and neonatal mortality among very low birth weight infants in the United States. Matern Child Health J 2006; 10: 47-53
• 12 Wylie BJ, Davidson LL, Batra M. et al. Method of delivery and neonatal outcome in very low-birthweight vertex-presenting fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 640.e1-640.e7
• 13 Riskin A, Riskin-Mashiah S, Lusky A. et al. Israel Neonatal Network. The relationship between delivery mode and mortality in very low birthweight singleton vertex-presenting infants. BJOG 2004; 111: 1365-1371
• 14 Durie DE, Sciscione AC, Hoffman MK. et al. Mode of delivery and outcomes in very low-birth-weight infants in the vertex presentation. Am J Perinatol 2011; 28: 195-200
• 15 Reddy UM, Zhang J, Sun L. et al. Neonatal mortality by attempted route of delivery in early preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207: 117.e1-117.e8
• 16 Kuper SG, Sievert RA, Steele R. et al. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Indicated Preterm Births Based on the Intended Mode of Delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130: 1143-1151
• 17 Leitner H. Fachbeirat des Geburtenregisters Österreich. Geburtenregister Österreich. Bericht über die Geburtshilfe in Österreich 2016. 2017 Online: https://www.iet.at/data.cfm?vpath=publikationen210/groe/groe-jahresbericht-2016 last access: 11.09.2018
• 18 Heller G, Schnell R, Misselwitz B. et al. Why are babies born at night at increased risk of early neonatal mortality?. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2003; 207: 137-142
• 19 Stephansson O, Dickman PW, Johansson AL. et al. Time of birth and risk of intrapartum and early neonatal death. Epidemiology 2003; 14: 218-222
• 20 Gould JB, Qin C, Chavez G. Time of birth and the risk of neonatal death. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106: 352-358
• 21 Gould JB, Qin C, Marks AR. et al. Neonatal mortality in weekend vs. weekly births. JAMA 2003; 289: 2958-2962