CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2019; 07(02): E290-E297
DOI: 10.1055/a-0806-7060
Original article
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019

Carbon dioxide versus room air for colonoscopy in deeply sedated pediatric patients: a randomized controlled trial

Andrea Kresz
1   Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany
,
Benjamin Mayer
2   Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
,
Maria Zernickel
1   Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany
,
Carsten Posovszky
1   Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 07 June 2017

accepted after revision 24 September 2018

Publication Date:
30 January 2019 (online)

Abstract

Background and study aims Use of carbon dioxide (CO2) instead of room air (RA) during colonoscopy in adults revealed significantly less flatulence and abdominal pain in several studies. The objectives of this study were to investigate the effects of CO2 usage on post-interventional pain, abdominal discomfort, abdominal girth, pCO2 levels, and narcotic requirement in deeply sedated pediatric patients.

Patients and methods A total of 97 children and adolescents aged 4 years to 17 years undergoing colonoscopy were randomized to RA or CO2 in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Age-appropriate pain scales assessed abdominal pain as primary outcome. In addition, abdominal girth, abdominal bloating, transcutaneous pCO2, narcotic requirement to achieve deeply sedation, and post-procedural analgesic demand was analyzed in 73 patients.

Results Overall, significantly fewer patients reported bloating in the CO2 group (P = 0.0012). However, we observed only a trend to lower post-interventional pain (P = 0.15) and a lower pain score. There was no significant difference in transcutaneous pCO2 level and no adverse events occurred. Although there was no difference in the dosage of propofol and midazolam, we observed a significant increased necessity for use of synthetic opioids in the RA group to achieve optimal examination conditions (P = 0.023).

Conclusions The benefits using CO2 in colonoscopy of deeply sedated children predominate. In particular, CO2 insufflation may allow a less painful post-interventional time and it significantly reduces abdominal bloating. Moreover, with CO2, significantly less additional opioids were used. Thus, CO2 insufflation can be considered as safe in deeply sedated patients as there was no relevant pulmonary CO2 retention observed. (DRKS00013914)

 
  • References

  • 1 Stevenson GW, Wilson JA, Wilkinson J. et al. Pain following colonoscopy: elimination with carbon dioxide. Gastrointest Endosc 1992; 38: 564-567
  • 2 Sumanac K, Zealley I, Fox BM. et al. Minimizing postcolonoscopy abdominal pain by using CO insufflation: A prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial evaluating a new commercially available CO delivery system. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 190-194
  • 3 Bretthauer M, Hoff GS, Thiis-Evensen E. et al. Air and carbon dioxide volumes insufflated during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 203-206
  • 4 Geyer M, Guller U, Beglinger C. Carbon dioxide insufflation in routine colonoscopy is safe and more comfortable: results of a randomized controlled double-blinded trial. Diagn Ther Endosc 2011; 2011: 378906
  • 5 Hussein AM, Bartram CI, Williams CB. Carbon dioxide insufflation for more comfortable colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1984; 30: 68-70
  • 6 Yamano HO, Yoshikawa K, Kimura T. et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation for colonoscopy: evaluation of gas volume, abdominal pain, examination time and transcutaneous partial CO2 pressure. J Gastroenterol 2010; 45: 1235-1240
  • 7 Yasumasa K, Nakajima K, Endo S. et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation attenuates parietal blood flow obstruction in distended colon: potential advantages of carbon dioxide insufflated colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 587-594
  • 8 Bretthauer M, Lynge AB, Thiis-Evensen E. et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy: safe and effective in sedated patients. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 706-709
  • 9 Dellon ES, Hawk JS, Grimm IS. et al. The use of carbon dioxide for insufflation during GI endoscopy: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 843-849
  • 10 Sajid MS, Caswell J, Bhatti MI. et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation vs conventional air insufflation for colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Dis 2015; 17: 111-123
  • 11 Wang WL, Wu ZH, Sun Q. et al. Meta-analysis: the use of carbon dioxide insufflation vs. room air insufflation for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012; 35: 1145-1154
  • 12 Memon MA, Memon B, Yunus RM. et al. Carbon dioxide versus air insufflation for elective colonoscopy: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2016; 26: 102-116
  • 13 World Medical. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013; 310: 2191-2194
  • 14 von Baeyer CL. Children’s self-reports of pain intensity: Scale selection, limitations and interpretation. Pain Res Manage 2006; 11: 157-162
  • 15 Kikuchi T, Fu KI, Saito Y. et al. Transcutaneous monitoring of partial pressure of carbon dioxide during endoscopic submucosal dissection of early colorectal neoplasia with carbon dioxide insufflation: a prospective study. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 2231-2235
  • 16 Nonaka S, Saito Y, Takisawa H. et al. Safety of carbon dioxide insufflation for upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopic treatment of patients under deep sedation. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 1638-1645
  • 17 Bretthauer M, Thiis-Evensen E, Huppertz-Hauss G. et al. NORCCAP (Norwegian colorectal cancer prevention): a randomised trial to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide versus air insufflation in colonoscopy. Gut 2002; 50: 604-607
  • 18 Homan M, Mahkovic D, Orel R. et al. Randomized, double-blind trial of CO2 versus air insufflation in children undergoing colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 993-997
  • 19 Wu J, Hu B. The role of carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 128-136
  • 20 Amato A, Radaelli F, Paggi S. et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation or warm-water infusion versus standard air insufflation for unsedated colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56: 511-518
  • 21 Domagk D, Bretthauer M, Lenz P. et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation improves intubation depth in double-balloon enteroscopy: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 1064-1067
  • 22 Saito Y, Uraoka T, Matsuda T. et al. A pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide insufflation during colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection with the patient under conscious sedation. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 537-542
  • 23 Heuss LT, Sugandha SP, Beglinger C. Carbon dioxide accumulation during analgosedated colonoscopy: comparison of propofol and midazolam. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 5389-5396
  • 24 Riss S, Akan B, Mikola B. et al. CO2 insufflation during colonoscopy decreases post-interventional pain in deeply sedated patients: a randomized controlled trial. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 2009; 121: 464-468