Efficacy and safety of carbon dioxide insufflation versus air insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background and study aims Ambient air is the most commonly used gas for insufflation in endoscopic procedures worldwide. However, prolonged absorption of air during endoscopic examinations may cause pain and abdominal distension. Carbon dioxide insufflation (CO₂i) has been increasingly used as an alternative to ambient air insufflation (AAi) in many endoscopic procedures due to its fast diffusion properties and less abdominal distention and pain. For endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), use of CO₂ for insufflation is adequate because this procedure is complex and prolonged. Some randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the efficacy and safety of CO₂ as an insufflation method during ERCP but presented conflicting results. This systematic review and meta-analysis with only RCTs evaluated the efficacy and safety of CO₂i versus AAi during ERCP.

Methods A literature search was performed using online databases with no restriction regarding idiom or year of publication. Data were extracted by two authors according to a predefined data extraction form. Outcomes evaluated were abdominal pain and distension, complications, procedure duration, and CO₂ levels.

Results Eight studies (919 patients) were included. Significant results favoring CO₂i were less abdominal distension after 1 h (MD: −1.41 [−1.81; −1.0], 95 % CI, I² = 15 %, P < 0.00001) and less abdominal pain after 1 h (MD: −23.80 [−27.50; −20.10], 95 %CI, I² = 9 %, P < 0.00001) and after 6 h (MD: −7.00 [−8.66; −5.33]; 95 % CI, I² = 0 %, P < 0.00001).

Conclusion Use of CO₂i instead of AAi during ERCP is safe and associated with less abdominal distension and pain after the procedure.

• References

• 1 Maple JT, Banerjee S, Barth BA. et al. Methods of luminal distention for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 519-525
• 2 Isaacs P. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography training in the United Kingdom: A critical review. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 3: 30
• 3 Lord AC. Is the type of insufflation a key issue in gastro-intestinal endoscopy?. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 2193
• 4 Wu J, Hu B. The role of carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 128-136
• 5 Janssens F, Deviere J, Eisendrath P. et al. Carbon dioxide for gut distension during digestive endoscopy: Technique and practice survey. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 1475
• 6 Coronel M, Korkischko N, Marques Bernardo W. et al. Comparison between carbon dioxide and air insufflation in colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized control trials. J Gastroenterol Pancreatol Liver Disord 2017; 1-11
• 7 Ribeiro IB, Bernardo WM, da Martins BC. et al. Colonic stent versus emergency surgery as treatment of malignant colonic obstruction in the palliative setting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int open 2018; 6: E558-E567
• 8 Muraki T, Arakura N, Kodama R. et al. Comparison of carbon dioxide and air insufflation use by non-expert endoscopists during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Dig Endosc 2013; 25: 189-196
• 9 Menes T, Spivak H. Laparoscopy Searching for the proper insufflation gas. Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 1050-1056
• 10 Enns R, Eloubeidi MA, Mergener K. et al. ERCP-related perforations: risk factors and management. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 293-298
• 11 Cheng Y. Carbon dioxide insufflation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 5622
• 12 Kim BS, Kim I-G, Ryu BY. et al. Management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations. J Korean Surg Soc 2011; 81: 195
• 13 Dellon ES, Velayudham A, Clarke BW. et al. A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of air insufflation versus carbon dioxide insufflation during ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 68-77
• 14 Luigiano C, Ferrara F, Pellicano R. et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation versus air insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography under general anesthesia. Minerva Med 2011; 102: 261-269
• 15 Chen Yi Mei SL, Ashby A, George B. et al. Mo1456 a prospective double blind randomised controlled trial of carbon dioxide versus air insufflation during ERCP: Is it worth the pain?. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: AB351
• 16 Arjunan S, Darishetty S, Tandan M. et al. Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial showing carbon dioxide is superior to air insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 26: 2
• 17 Huang Y, Gu HX, Guo ZH. et al. A randomized controlled study on carbon dioxide insufflation during ERCP (in Chinese). Chin J Dig Endosc 2011; 28: 664-667
• 18 Shi H, Chen S, Swar G. et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Pancreas 2013; 42: 1093-1100
• 19 Wu J. Carbon dioxide insufflation versus air insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. J Interv Gastroenterol 2013; 3: 37
• 20 Bretthauer M, Seip B, Aasen S. et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation for more comfortable endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 58-64
• 21 Maple JT, Keswani RN, Hovis RM. et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation during ERCP for reduction of postprocedure pain: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 278-283
• 22 Kuwatani M, Kawakami H, Hayashi T. et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography reduces bowel gas volume but does not affect visual analogue scale scores of suffering: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2011; 25: 3784-3790
• 23 Lee SJ, Lee TH, Park S-H. et al. Efficacy of carbon dioxide versus air insufflation according to different sedation protocols during therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Dig Endosc 2015; 27: 512-521
• 24 Nakamura K, Yamaguchi Y, Hasue T. et al. The usefulness and safety of carbon dioxide insufflation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in elderly patients: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Hepatogastroenterology 2014; 61: 2191-2195