CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2019; 07(04): E431-E432
DOI: 10.1055/a-0859-7233
Innovation forum
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019

Epstein-Barr virus detection using gastric biopsy specimens after rapid urease test for Helicobacter pylori

Hideo Yanai
1   Department of Clinical Research, National Hospital Organization Kanmon Medical Center, Yamaguchi, Japan
,
Hisashi Iizasa
2   Department of Microbiology, Shimane University School of Medicine, Shimane, Japan
,
Daisuke Chihara
3   Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, National Hospital Organization Kanmon Medical Center, Yamaguchi, Japan
,
Tomoyuki Murakami
4   Department of Pathology, National Hospital Organization Kanmon Medical Center, Yamaguchi, Japan
,
Jun Nishikawa
5   Department of Laboratory Science, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan
,
Hironori Yoshiyama
2   Department of Microbiology, Shimane University School of Medicine, Shimane, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 11 October 2018

accepted after revision 27 December 2018

Publication Date:
21 March 2019 (online)

Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric carcinoma (EBV GC) is a distinct subtype of GC [1] [2].) Many cases of EBV GC have a background of Helicobacter pylori (HP)-positive chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) [3]. How and when EBV appears in the gastric mucosa is important information for understanding EBV-associated carcinogenesis. Almost all everyone is EBV seropositive, and ordinary serological tests are not useful to detect EBV positivity in gastric mucosa. The pathogenic role of EBV in CAG is unknown. We previously reported that 65.7 % of CAG cases (23 of 35) were EBV positive in quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) for gastric biopsy specimens [4]. However, performing research-oriented EBV gastric biopsies for non-cancerous gastritis patients is difficult in esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). On the other hand, the rapid urease test (RUT) for HP is a routine procedure using gastric biopsy specimens [5]. We thought that the gastric biopsy specimen used for RUT might be a useful sample for EBV detection without any additional burden for the patient.

We tested gastric biopsy samples from patients who underwent routine EDG and agreed to EBV detection. They underwent EGD with RUT at the National Hospital Organization Kanmon Medical Center from July through August 2016. RUT was performed using a PyloriTek test kit (Serim Research Corp., United States).

We obtained written informed consent, and this study was approved by the institutional review board. Gastric biopsy samples used for RUT were frozen once and afterword subjected to Q-PCR for the EBV oriP gene. After RUT, a biopsy specimen was quickly collected from the RUT kit and frozen at – 80 °C. Specimens were transported from our hospital to the test laboratory in frozen condition.

EBV detection was successfully performed using two gastric biopsy specimens each after RUT in 10 cases. EBV was detected in four cases (40 %), and HP was detected in nine cases (90 %). Three cases were EBV and HP double positive.

In the current preliminary experience, simultaneous detection of both EBV and HP infection of the stomach using gastric biopsy specimens obtained for RUT was possible and is thus expected to become a useful tool for studying the carcinogenesis of EBV GC. EBV positivity of 40 % is relatively low compared with our former data of 65.7 %. However, the current data were obtained from a small number of samples, and we think these preliminary results are indicative of the utility of this method. We will analyze the sensitivity of the current method in a future large-scale study.

Reuse of gastric biopsy specimens for EBV detection after RUT is noninvasive with only minimal difficulty for the endoscopist. We hope our current method will provide a great deal of data on EBV positivity in gastric mucosa and be used for future prevention for EBV GC.