CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2019; 07(11): E1457-E1467
DOI: 10.1055/a-0996-8118
Original article
Owner and Copyright © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019

IMPlementing split Regimen OVEr Single dose using a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach (IMPROVES study)

Giuseppe Vanella
1   Sant’Andrea Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
,
Cesare Hassan
2   Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
,
Mario De Bellis
3   Istituto Nazionale Tumori – IRCCS – Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
,
Maxemiliano Giardini
4   Urbino Hospital, Urbino, Italy
,
Enrico Grasso
5   Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
,
Francesco Laterza
6   Gabriele d’Annunzio University and Foundation, Chieti, Italy
,
Ottaviano Tarantino
7   San Giuseppe Hospital, Empoli, Italy
,
Emilio Di Giulio
1   Sant’Andrea Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
› Author Affiliations
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Single-Center, Observational, Cross-sectional study NCT03581175 at clinicaltrials.gov
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 09 May 2019

accepted after revision 27 June 2019

Publication Date:
22 October 2019 (online)

Abstract

Background and aims A split-dose regimen for colonoscopy is recommended by international guidelines, but its adoption is still suboptimal. Our aim was to assess whether a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach (PDSA), a scientific method promoting quality improvement, would be able to improve adherence to a split-dose regimen, and to identify factors influencing its adoption.

Methods This study consisted of three phases: Cycle 1: a cross-sectional assessment of split-dose adherence in consecutive outpatients/inpatients undergoing colonoscopies in 74 Italian centers; Educational intervention: regional meetings with literature review, analysis of Cycle 1 data, and discussion on corrective measures; local diffusion of educational material and tools for improvement; Cycle 2: reassessment of split-dose adherence after spontaneous local interventions. Demographic, clinical, and procedural variables were systematically collected. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of split-dose adoption.

Results In total, 8213 patients (mean age = 60.29 years (SD = 13.58), men = 54 %, outpatients = 88.4 %) were enrolled between 2013 and 2016 (Cycle 1 = 4189 patients and Cycle 2 = 4024 patients). Split-dose adoption rose from 29.1 % in Cycle 1 to 51.1 % in Cycle 2 (P < 0.0001), and being enrolled in Cycle 2 independently predicted split-dose adherence (OR = 2.9; 95 %CI 2.6 – 3.3). The adoption improved in all time slots, including colonoscopies scheduled before 0930. The main corrective measures were: rescheduling of colonoscopies after 0930 (between 0930 and 1130: OR = 2.6; 95 %CI 2.3 – 3.1; after 1130: OR = 7; 95 %CI 5.9 – 8.4); the cleansing regimen communicated by the Endoscopy unit (via form: OR = 1.6; 95 %CI 1.3 – 1.9; via visit: OR = 2.1; 95 %CI 1.7 – 2.5); a decrease in the use of deep sedation (OR = 2; 95 %CI 1.7 – 2.5).

Conclusions An educational intervention with observation-driven corrections through a PDSA approach was able to substantially increase the adoption of a split-dose regimen.

Supplementary Material

 
  • References

  • 1 Bucci C, Rotondano G, Hassan C. et al. Optimal bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: split the dose! A series of meta-analyses of controlled studies. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 566-576.e2
  • 2 Martel M, Barkun AN, Menard C. et al. Split-dose preparations are superior to day-before bowel cleansing regimens: A meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2015; 149: 79-88
  • 3 Radaelli F, Paggi S, Hassan C. et al. Split-dose preparation for colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a randomised controlled trial in an organised screening programme. Gut 2017; 66: 270-277
  • 4 Jover R, Zapater P, Polanía E. et al. Modifiable endoscopic factors that influence the adenoma detection rate in colorectal cancer screening colonoscopies. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 381-389.e1
  • 5 Hassan C, Bretthauer M, Kaminski MF. et al. Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 142-150
  • 6 Saltzman JR, Cash BD. et al. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee JR. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 781-794
  • 7 Woo DH, Kim KO, Jeong DE. et al. Prospective analysis of factors associated with inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in actual clinical practice. Intest Res 2018; 16: 293-298
  • 8 Rembacken B, Hassan C, Riemann JF. et al. Quality in screening colonoscopy: position statement of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Endoscopy 2012; 44: 957-968
  • 9 Johnson DA, Barkun AN, Cohen LB. et al. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 543-562
  • 10 Menees SB, Kim HM, Wren P. et al. Patient compliance and suboptimal bowel preparation with split-dose bowel regimen in average-risk screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 79: 811-820.e3
  • 11 Radaelli F, Paggi S, Repici A. et al. Barriers against split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gut 2017; 66: 1428-1433
  • 12 Andrealli A, Paggi S, Amato A. et al. Educational strategies for colonoscopy bowel prep overcome barriers against split-dosing: A randomized controlled trial. United Eur Gastroenterol J 2018; 6: 283-289
  • 13 Calderwood AH, Mahoney EM, Jacobson BC. A Plan-Do-Study-Act approach to improving bowel preparation quality. Am J Med Qual 2017; 32: 194-200
  • 14 Shah-Khan SM, Cumberledge J, Reynolds GJ. Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act approach to improve inpatient colonoscopy preparation. BMJ Open Qual 2017; 6: e000230
  • 15 Langley G, Moen R, Nolan K. et al. The improvement guide: a practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 2009
  • 16 Kheraj R, Tewani SK, Ketwaroo G. et al. Quality improvement in gastroenterology clinical practice. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 1305-1314
  • 17 Taylor MJ, McNicholas C, Nicolay C. et al. Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf 2014; 23: 290-298
  • 18 Srisarajivakul N, Chua D, Williams R. et al. How we cleaned it up: A simple method that improved our practice’s bowel prep. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111: 1079-1081
  • 19 Siddiqui AA, Yang K, Spechler SJ. et al. Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel-preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 700-706
  • 20 Walter B, Klare P, Strehle K. et al. Improving the quality and acceptance of colonoscopy preparation by reinforced patient education with short message service: results from a randomized, multicenter study (PERICLES-II). Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 506-513.e4
  • 21 Spiegel BMR, Talley J, Shekelle P. et al. Development and validation of a novel patient educational booklet to enhance colonoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 875-883
  • 22 Sharara AI, Chalhoub JM, Beydoun M. et al. A customized mobile application in colonoscopy preparation: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2017; 8: e211
  • 23 Xue S, Chen H, Cheng C. et al. Gastric residual volume after split-dose bowel preparation versus conventional single-dose regimen before anesthetic colonoscopy. Biomed Res Int 2017; 2017: 1-4
  • 24 Agrawal D, Elsbernd B, Singal AG. et al. Gastric residual volume after split-dose compared with evening-before polyethylene glycol bowel preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 574-580
  • 25 Huffman M, Unger RZ, Thatikonda C. et al. Split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy and residual gastric fluid volume: an observational study. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 516-522
  • 26 Alghamry A, Ponnuswamy SK, Agarwal A. et al. Split-dose bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy performed under propofol sedation. Is there an optimal timing?. J Dig Dis 2017; 18: 160-168