Zentralbl Chir 2020; 145(06): 565-573
DOI: 10.1055/a-1008-9598
Original Article

A Comparison of the Currently Used Nodal Stage Classification with the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes and the Number of Metastatic Lymph Node Stations for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; Which of These Is the Best Prognostic Factor?[*]

Vergleich der zur Zeit verwendeten Stufenklassifizierung mit der Anzahl metastatischer Lymphknoten und der Anzahl metastatischer Lymphknoten für nichtkleinzelligen Lungenkrebs; welcher ist der beste Prognosefaktor?
Necati Citak
1   Thoracic Surgery, Bakirkoy Dr Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Yunus Aksoy
2   Thoracic Surgery, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Özgür Isgörücü
1   Thoracic Surgery, Bakirkoy Dr Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Cigdem Obuz
2   Thoracic Surgery, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Baris Acikmese
1   Thoracic Surgery, Bakirkoy Dr Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Songul Buyukkale
1   Thoracic Surgery, Bakirkoy Dr Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Muzaffer Metin
2   Thoracic Surgery, Yedikule Chest Diseases and Thoracic Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
,
Adnan Sayar
1   Thoracic Surgery, Bakirkoy Dr Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objectives We aimed to compare the currently used nodal staging system (pN) with the number of metastatic lymph node (LN) stations (sN) and the number of metastatic LNs (nN) on survival in patients with NSCLC.

Methods Between 2010 and 2017, 1038 patients resected for NSCLC were analyzed. We performed three-different stratifications of LN status assessment: pN-category (pN0, pN1 and pN2); sN-category (sN0, sN1; one station metastasis, sN2; two-three stations metastases, and sN3; ≥ 4 stations metastasis); nN-category (nN0, nN1; one-three LNs metastasis, nN2; four-six Lns metastasis, and nN3; ≥ 7 LNs metastasis).

Results Five-year survival rate was 70.1% for N0 in all classifications. It was 54.3% for pN1, and 26.4% for pN2 (p < 0.0001). Five-year survival rates for N1, N2, and N3 categories were 54.1%, 42.4% and 16.1% according to sN, and 51.4%, 36.1%, and 7.9% according to nN, respectively (p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, sN and nN were independent risk factors such as pN (p < 0.0001). Hazard ratios versus N0 for N1, N2, and N3 were more significant for sN and nN than pN (1.597, 2.176, and, 3.883 for sN, 1.645, 2.658, and, 4.118 for nN, and 1.576, 3.222 for pN, respectively). When the subcategories of sN and nN were divided into pN1 and pN2 subgroups, the anatomic location of the LN involvement lost importance as tumor burden and tumor spreading increased.

Conclusion The number of metastatic LN stations and the number of metastatic LNs are better prognostic factors than currently used nodal classification in NSCLC.

Zusammenfassung

Ziele Die Anzahl der metastasierten LN-Stationen und die Anzahl der metastasierten LNs sind bessere prognostische Faktoren als die derzeit verwendete nodale Klassifikation in NSCLC.

Methoden Zwischen 2010 und 2017 wurden 1038 resezierte Patienten für NSCLC analysiert. Wir haben 3 verschiedene Schichten für die LN-Zustandsbewertung durchgeführt: pN-Kategorie (pN0, pN1 und pN2); sN-Kategorie (sN0, sN1; 1. Station der Metastase, sN2; die 2. und 3. Station der Metastasen und sN3; ≥ 4. Station der Metastasen); die nN-Kategorie (nN0, nN1; 3 LNs Metastase, nN2; Metastasen in 4 – 6 LNs und nN3; Metastasen in ≥ 7 LNs).

Ergebnisse Die 5-Jahres-Überlebensrate betrug 70,1% für N0 in allen Klassifikationen. Sie lag bei 54,3% für pN1 und 26,4% für pN2 (p < 0,0001). Die 5-Jahres-Überlebensrate für die Kategorien N1, N2 und N3 betrug 54,1%, 42,4% und 16,1% nach sN und 51,4%, 36,1% und 7,9% nach nN (p < 0,0001). In der multivariaten Analyse waren sN und nN unabhängige Risikofaktoren wie pN (p < 0,0001). Die Gefahrenverhältnisse gegenüber N0 für N1, N2 und N3 waren für sN und nN signifikanter als für pN (1,597, 2,176 und 3,883 für sN; 1,645, 2,658 und 4,118 für nN bzw. 1,576, 3,222 für pN). Bei der Einteilung der Unterkategorien von sN und nN in den pN1- und pN2-Subgruppen verloren die anatomische Lage der LN-Beteiligung mit zunehmender Tumorbelastung und Tumorausbreitung an Bedeutung.

Fazit Die Anzahl der metastasierten LN-Stationen und die Anzahl der metastasierten LNs sind bessere prognostische Faktoren als die derzeit verwendete nodale Klassifikation in NSCLC.

* Presentation: Presented at the Oral Presentation Session of the 26th European Conference on General Thoracic Surgery, Ljubljana/Slovenia/2018; winner of the ESTS/the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Thoraxchirurgie Travel Grant Award




Publication History

Article published online:
24 October 2019

© 2019. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J. et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for Revision of the TNM Stage Groupings in the Forthcoming (Eighth) Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11: 39-51
  • 2 Rusch VW, Crowley J, Giroux DJ. et al. International Staging Committee; Cancer Research and Biostatistics; Observers to the Committee; Participating Institutions. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the N descriptors in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2007; 2: 603-612
  • 3 Asamura H, Chansky K, Crowley J. et al. The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Lung Cancer Staging Project: Proposals for the Revision of the N Descriptors in the Forthcoming 8th Edition of the TNM Classification for Lung Cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2015; 10: 1675-1684
  • 4 Fukui T, Mori S, Yokoi K, Mitsudomi T. Significance of the number of positive lymph nodes in resected non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2006; 1: 120-125
  • 5 Lee JG, Lee CY, Park IK. et al. Number of metastatic lymph nodes in resected non-small cell lung cancer predicts patient survival. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85: 211-215
  • 6 Wei S, Asamura H, Kawachi R. et al. Which is the better prognostic factor for resected non-small cell lung cancer: the number of metastatic lymph nodes or the currently used nodal stage classification?. J Thorac Oncol 2011; 6: 310-318
  • 7 Matsuguma H, Oki I, Nakahara R. et al. Proposal of new nodal classifications for non-small-cell lung cancer based on the number and ratio of metastatic lymph nodes. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 41: 19-24
  • 8 Saji H, Tsuboi M, Shimada Y. et al. A proposal for combination of total number and anatomical location of involved lymph nodes for nodal classification in non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 2013; 143: 1618-1625
  • 9 Lee GD, Kim DK, Moon DH. et al. A comparison of the proposed classifications for the revision of N descriptors for non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016; 49: 580-588
  • 10 Citak N, Sayar A, Metin M. et al. The Prognostic Significance of Metastasis to Lymph Nodes in Aortopulmonary Zone (Stations 5 and 6) in Completely Resected Left Upper Lobe Tumors. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 63: 568-576
  • 11 Citak N, Buyukkale S, Kok A. et al. Does video-assisted mediastinoscopy offer lower false-negative rates for subcarinal lymph nodes compared with standard cervical mediastinoscopy?. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 62: 624-630
  • 12 Metin M, Citak N, Sayar A. et al. The role of extended cervical mediastinoscopy in staging of non-small cell lung cancer of the left lung and a comparison with integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography: does integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography reduce the need for invasive procedures?. J Thorac Oncol 2011; 6: 1713-1719
  • 13 Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. 7th ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010
  • 14 Asamura H, Suzuki K, Kondo H. et al. Where is the boundary between N1 and N2 stations in lung cancer?. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 1839-1845 discussion 1845–1846
  • 15 Rusch VW, Asamura H, Watanabe H. et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project. A proposal for a new international lymph node map in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2009; 4: 568-577