Drug Res (Stuttg) 2020; 70(S 01): S13-S14
DOI: 10.1055/a-1119-2708
Extended Abstract

Adverse Cutaneous Drug Reactions

Lars E. French

The skin is one of the most frequently involved organs by drug side effects, with the incidence of adverse cutaneous drug reactions situated between 0.1 – 1% of patients during pre-marketing clinical trials, and post-marketing analyses suggest that their incidence can be as high as 1 – 8% for certain types of drugs (NSAIDS, antibiotics, antiepileptics). Adverse cutaneous drug reactions are benign in nature in over 98% of cases and present most frequently as maculo-papular eruptions or urticaria. However, studies suggest that roughly a third of drug eruptions require hospital management and are considered as severe, although fortunately only 2% of cutaneous drug eruptions are really life-threatening; this is the case for Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), and drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS)/drug induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS). It is estimated that between 2 and 5% of all hospital costs are related to adverse drug eruptions, and – cutaneous adverse drug eruptions representing 20 – 30% of all drug eruptions – the burden of these on the health care system is considerable.



Publication History

Article published online:
17 November 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Kuijper EC, French LE, Tensen CP. et al. Clinical and pathogenic aspects of the severe cutaneous adverse reaction epidermal necrolysis (EN). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020; DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16339.
  • 2 Hoetzenecker W, Nägeli M, Mehra ET. et al. Adverse cutaneous drug eruptions: current understanding. Semin Immunopathol 2016; 38: 75-86
  • 3 Meier-Schiesser B, Feldmeyer L, Jankovic D. et al. Culprit Drugs Induce Specific IL-36 Overexpression in Acute Generalized Exanthematous Pustulosis. J Invest Dermatol 2019; 139: 848-858