A novel method of biopsy for indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures: tube-assisted biopsy

Abstract

Background Single-operator cholangioscopy (SOC) provides an accurate diagnosis of indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures. However, the procedure is expensive and can be performed using only limited accessories. Therefore, we devised a novel tube-assisted biopsy (TAB) technique and evaluated its feasibility, diagnostic yield, and safety for indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures.

Methods The medical records of patients with indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures who underwent TAB between September 2018 and July 2019 were reviewed. We assessed the technical success rate, adverse event rate, sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of TAB in differentiating malignant from benign lesions.

Results TABs were performed in 16 patients: 12 had biliary strictures; four had pancreatic strictures. The technical success rate was 93.7 % (15/16), and the sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of TAB were 87.5 %, 100 %, and 93.7 %, respectively. No serious adverse events occurred either during or after the procedure in any of the patients.

Conclusions TAB has an acceptable accuracy for the diagnosis of indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures and may represent a useful diagnostic method in patients where SOC cannot be implemented.

Publication History

Received: 29 September 2019

Accepted: 04 February 2020

Article published online:
27 March 2020

• References

• 1 Kalaitzakis E, Webster GJ. Endoscopic diagnosis of biliary tract disease. Current Opin Gastroenterol 2012; 28: 273-279
• 2 Bowlus CL, Olson KA, Gershwin ME. Evaluation of indeterminate biliary strictures. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 13: 28-37
• 3 Singh A, Gelrud A, Agarwal B. Biliary strictures: diagnostic considerations and approach. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2015; 3: 22-31
• 4 Draganov PV, Chauhan S, Wagh MS. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and cholangioscopy-guided sampling of indeterminate biliary lesions at the time of ERCP: a prospective, long-term follow-up study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 347-353
• 5 Ayoub F, Yang D, Draganov PV. Cholangioscopy in the digital era. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 3: 82
• 6 Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH. et al., eds. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th. edn. Lyon, France: IARC; 2010
• 7 Hu B, Sun B, Cai Q. et al. Asia-Pacific consensus guidelines for endoscopic management of benign biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 86: 44-58
• 8 Victor DW, Sherman S, Karakan T. et al. Current endoscopic approach to indeterminate biliary strictures. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 6197-6205
• 9 Komanduri S, Thosani N. ASGE Technology Committee. et al. Cholangiopancreatoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 209-221
• 10 Higashizawa T, Tamada K, Tomiyama T. et al. Looping technique for transpapillary selective biopsy of the left hepatic duct. J Gastroenterol 2001; 36: 492-494