Download PDF
Phlebologie 2020; 49(03): 133-138
DOI: 10.1055/a-1154-9122
Schwerpunktthema Crossenrezidive

Das Krossenrezidiv der V. saphena magna aus Sicht des Anatomen

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Erich Brenner
  Institute of Clinical and Functional Anatomy, Medical University of Innsbruck
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Rezidive im Bereich der Krosse, dem Einmündungsbereich der V. saphena magna, können aus anatomischer Sicht aus verschiedenen Quellen stammen. Einerseits kann es sich um eine Rekanalisation einer ursprünglich verschlossenen V. saphena magna handeln. Zweitens kann eine andere Vene der Krossenregion die Funktion übernehmen und dilatieren. Als dritte Variante kommt eine – mehr oder minder gelungene – Neubildung infrage. Im letzteren Fall kann es zur Neubildung einer suffizienten Vene kommen, es kann eine insuffiziente Vene entstehen oder aber es gelingt keine hinreichende Venenbildung und es bleibt bei büschelartigen, zarten, aber völlig inkompletten Gefäßchen (Neovaskularisate).

Schlüsselwörter

V. saphena magna - Varizen - Rezidiv - Vv. saphenae accessoriae - Neovaskularisation

Key words

great saphenous vein - varices - recurrence - accessory saphenous veins - neovascularization


Publication History

Article published online:
25 May 2020

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 

  • References

  • 1 Caggiati A, Ricci S. The Long Saphenous Vein Compartment. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease 2016; 12: 107-111 . doi:10.1177/026835559701200307
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Brenner E. Lymphbahnen an den Beinen. Phlebologie 2020. submitted
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Mühlberger D, Morandini L, Brenner E. Venous valves and major superficial tributary veins near the saphenofemoral junction. J Vasc Surg 2009; 49: 1562-1569 . doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2009.02.241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Van der Velden SK, Lawaetz M, De Maeseneer MG. et al Predictors of Recanalization of the Great Saphenous Vein in Randomized Controlled Trials 1 Year After Endovenous Thermal Ablation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2016; 52: 234-241 . doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.01.021
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Fisher O. Re: ‘Predictors of Recanalization of the Great Saphenous Vein in Randomized Controlled Trials 1 Year After Endovenous Thermal Ablation’. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2016; 52: 268-268 . doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.04.021
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kemaloğlu C. Saphenous vein diameter is a single risk factor for early recanalization after endothermal ablation of incompetent great saphenous vein. Vascular 2019; 27: 537-541 . doi:10.1177/1708538119837110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Fischer R, Linde N, Duff C. et al Das Krosserezidiv – eine Nachkontrolle nach 34 Jahren. Phlebologie 2000; 29: 17-22 . doi:10.1055/s-0037-1617336
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Reichmann F, Broermann M, Vogt K. Häufigkeit persistierender Venae saphenae accessoriae anteriores und subinguinaler Perforansvenen bei inguinalen Crossenrezidiven. VasoMed 2013; 25: 254-256
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Garner JP, Heppell PS, Leopold PW. The lateral accessory saphenous vein–a common cause of recurrent varicose veins. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2003; 85: 389-392
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Rutherford EE, Kianifard B, Cook SJ. et al Incompetent perforating veins are associated with recurrent varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2001; 21: 458-460 . doi:10.1053/ejvs.2001.1347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Pawlaczyk K, Zielinski P, Waliszewski K. et al The role of incompetent perforators in the development of recurrences after surgery for primary lower leg varices. Acta Angiol 2010; 16: 158-171
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Langenbeck B. Beiträge zur chirurgischen Pathologie der Venen. Arch Klin Chir 1861; 1: 1-80
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Breuckmann K. Histomorphologische Klassifikation der Rezidivvarikosis im Bereich der saphenofemoralen Junktion. Bochum: Ruhr-Universität Bochum; 2005: 79
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Mumme A. Das Crossenrezidiv aus der Sicht des Operateurs. Phlebologie 2020; 49: 139-143
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Casoni P, Lefebvre-Vilardebo M, Villa F. et al Stump evolution after great saphenous vein stripping with high ligation. Veins and Lymphatics 2016; 5: 5573
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Cappelli M, Molino-Lova R, Giangrandi I. et al Ligation of the saphenofemoral junction tributaries as risk factor for groin recurrence. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2018; 6: 224-229 . doi:10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.09.005
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Glass GM. Neovascularization in Recurrence of the Varicose Great Saphenous Vein following Transection. Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease 1987; 2: 81-91 . doi:10.1177/026835558700200205
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Munasinghe A, Smith C, Kianifard B. et al Strip-track revascularization after stripping of the great saphenous vein. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 840-843 . doi:10.1002/bjs.5598
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kohler A, Dirsch O, Brunner U. Veno-lymphatische Angiodysplasie als Ursache einer inguinalen Rezidivvarikose; Veno-lymphatic angiodysplasia as a possible cause of inguinal recurrent varicose veins. VASA 1997; 26: 52-54
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Corbett CR, Prakash V. Neovascularisation is not an innocent bystander in recurrence after great saphenous vein surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2015; 97: 102-108 . doi:10.1308/003588414X14055925061199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Creton D. Neovascularisation – What is the surgeon's responsibility?. Phlebologie 2008; 37: 134-141
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 22 De Maeseneer M. Neovascularization: An adverse response to proper groin dissection. In: Bergan JJ. Hrsg The Vein Book. Burlington: Academic Press; 2007: 239-246
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 De Maeseneer MG. The role of postoperative neovascularisation in recurrence of varicose veins: from historical background to today’s evidence. Acta Chir Belg 2004; 104: 283-289 . doi:10.1080/00015458.2004.11679555
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Egan B, Donnelly M, Bresnihan M. et al Neovascularization: an “innocent bystander” in recurrent varicose veins. J Vasc Surg 2006; 44: 1279-1284 ; discussion 1284. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2006.08.017
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Frings N, Tran VTP, Nelle A. et al Krossenrezidiv der Vena saphena magna trotz korrekter Krossektomie: Neoangiogenese. Phlebologie 1999; 28: 144-148 . doi:10.1055/s-0037-1617154
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Glass GM. Neovascularization in recurrence of varices of the great saphenous vein in the groin: phlebography. Angiology 1988; 39: 577-582 . doi:10.1177/000331978803900704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Glass GM. Neovascularization in recurrent sapheno-femoral incompetence of varicose veins: Surgical anatomy and morphology. Phlebology 1995; 10: 136-142
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Glass GM. Prevention of sapheno-femoral and sapheno-popliteal recurrence of varicose veins by forming a partition to contain neovascularization. Phlebology 1998; 13: 3-9 . doi:10.1177/026835559801300102
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Glass GM. Neovascularization in Recurrence of Varices of the Great Saphenous Vein in the Groin: Surgical Anatomy and Morphology. Vasc Surg 2016; 23: 435-442 . doi:10.1177/153857448902300603
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Haas E, Burkhardt T, Maile N. Rezidivhäufigkeit durch Neoangiogenese nach modifizierter Krossektomie. Phlebologie 2005; 34: 101-104 . doi:10.1055/s-0037-1621409
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Jones L, Braithwaite BD, Selwyn D. et al Neovascularisation is the principal cause of varicose vein recurrence: Results of a randomised trial of stripping the long saphenous vein. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996; 12: 442-445 . doi:10.1016/s1078-5884(96)80011-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Labropoulos N, Bhatti A, Leon L. et al Neovascularization after great saphenous vein ablation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2006; 31: 219-222 . doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.06.030
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Mikusek W, Waniczek D, Arendt J. et al Neovascularization in the Region of Saphenofemoral Junction Following Babcock Excision of Great Saphenous Vein. Polish Journal of Surgery 2009; 81: 383-391 . doi:10.2478/v10035-009-0065-2
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Moreau PM. Neovascularization is not a major cause of varicose vein recurrence. International Journal of Angiology 2002; 11: 99-101 . doi:10.1007/BF01616375
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Mouton W, Heim D, Janzen J. Neovascularization of saphenous veins. J Vasc Bras 2019; 18: e20190030 . doi:10.1590/1677-5449.190030
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Nyamekye I, Shephard NA, Davies B. et al Clinicopathological evidence that neovascularisation is a cause of recurrent varicose veins. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1998; 15: 412-415 . doi:10.1016/s1078-5884(98)80202-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Olbrich S. Saphenofemorales Leistenrezidiv nach Stripping der Vena saphena magna: Neovaskulat oder nicht? [Doctoral thesis]. Bochum: Ruhr-Universität Bochum; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Ostler AE, Holdstock JM, Harrison CC. et al Primary avalvular varicose anomalies are a naturally occurring phenomenon that might be misdiagnosed as neovascular tissue in recurrent varicose veins. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2014; 2: 390-396 . doi:10.1016/j.jvsv.2014.05.003
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Reich-Schupke S, Mumme A, Altmeyer P. et al Decorin expression with stump recurrence and neovascularization after varicose vein surgery – a pilot study. Dermatol Surg 2011; 37: 480-485 . doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.01912.x
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Rewerk S, Meyer AJ, Duczek C. et al Beteiligung von VEGF-R (vascular endothelial growth factor receptor) und NGF (nerve growth factor) bei der Neovaskularisation als Ursache der Rezidivvarikosis in der Krosse. In: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie, Hrsg. Chirurgisches Forum 2006. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2006: 429-431 DOI: 10.1007/3-540-34668-6_145
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Rewerk S, Noppeney T, Nüllen H. et al Neoangiogenese als Rezidivursache nach Krossektomie der primären Stammvarikose. Gefässchirurgie 2008; 13: 130-134 . doi:10.1007/s00772-008-0598-4
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Rewerk S, Noppeney T, Winkler M. et al Venoneuronale De- und Regeneration bei Varikogenese und Neovaskularisation – Einfluss von Nerve-growth-Faktor. Phlebologie 2007; 36: 8-16
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Rewerk S, Nüllen H, Winkler M. et al Nervenfasern in Exzisaten von Rezidivvarizen – Der Wert der S100-Färbung. Phlebologie 2005; 34: 299-304
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 44 van Rij AM, Jones GT, Hill GB. et al Neovascularization and recurrent varicose veins: more histologic and ultrasound evidence. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40: 296-302 . doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2004.04.031
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Mumme A, Burger P, Hummel T. et al Der lang belassene Saphenastumpf. Phlebologie 2007; 36: 256-259 . doi:10.1055/s-0037-1622194
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 46 De Maeseneer MG, Philipsen TE, Vandenbroeck CP. et al Closure of the cribriform fascia: an efficient anatomical barrier against postoperative neovascularisation at the saphenofemoral junction? A prospective study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 34: 361-366 . doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.03.020
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Schnyder S, Gabler S, Meier TO. et al Successful reduction of clinical relevant neovascularization with a modified crossectomy combined with a barrier technique after 10-year follow-up. Phlebology 2012; 27: 404-408 . doi:10.1258/phleb.2011.011065
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 De Maeseneer MG, Vandenbroeck CP, Lauwers PR. et al Early and late complications of silicone patch saphenoplasty at the saphenofemoral junction. J Vasc Surg 2006; 44: 1285-1290 . doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2006.08.012
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar