Download PDF
neuroreha 2020; 12(02): 71-81
DOI: 10.1055/a-1156-3925
Schwerpunkt

Assessments für die obere Extremität

Jan Mehrholz
,
Simone Thomas
,
Bernhard Elsner
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

In der neurologischen Rehabilitation sollten standardisierte Testverfahren und Assessments den Empfehlungen der Leitlinien folgend, beispielsweise nach Schlaganfall, systematisch eingesetzt werden. Assessments helfen einerseits bei der zuverlässigen Einschätzung von Veränderungen individueller Patienten. Andererseits können Assessmentverfahren Patienten motivieren und sie darin unterstützen, das Erreichen ihrer Ziele zu dokumentieren.



Publication History

Article published online:
09 June 2020

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Hasson S. et al. The modified Tardieu scale for the measurement of elbow flexor spasticity in adult patients with hemiplegia. Brain Inj 2008; 22: 1007-1012
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Awan R, Smith J, Boon AJ. Measuring shoulder internal rotation range of motion: A comparison of 3 techniques. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 1229-1234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bauder H, Taub E, Miltner W. Behandlung motorischer Störungen nach Schlaganfall: Die Taubsche Bewegungstherapie. In: Taub E. Hrsg. Therapeutische Praxis. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Bovend’Eerdt TJ, Dawes H, Johansen-Berg H. et al. Evaluation of the modified Jebsen test of hand function and the University of Maryland Arm Questionnaire for Stroke. Clin Rehabil 2004; 18: 195-202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L. et al. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther 1985; 65: 175-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Chen H, Chen C, Hsueh I. et al. Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23: 435-440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Collin C, Wade D. Assessing motor impairment after stroke: A pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990; 53: 576-579
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaye E. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol 1980; 19: 382-389 doi:10.1159/000115178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 De Winter AF, Heemskerk MA, Terwee CB. et al. Inter-observer reproducibility of measurements of range of motion in patients with shoulder pain using a digital inclinometer. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2004; 5: 18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Duff SV, He J, Nelsen MA. et al. Interrater reliability of the Wolf Motor Function Test-Functional Ability Scale: Why it matters. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2015; 29: 436-443
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Duncan Millar J, van Wijck F, Pollock A. et al. Outcome measures in post-stroke arm rehabilitation trials: Do existing measures capture outcomes that are important to stroke survivors, carers, and clinicians?. Clinical Rehabilitation 2019; 33: 737-749 DOI: 10.1177/0269215518823248.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Earhart G, Cavanaugh J, Ellis T. et al. The 9-hole PEG test of upper extremity function: Average values, test-retest reliability, and factors contributing to performance in people with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Phys Ther 35: 157-163
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Engstrand C, Krevers B, Kvist J. Interrater reliability in finger joint goniometer measurement in Dupuytren’s disease. Am J Occup Ther 2012; 66: 98-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Norlin V. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. II. Incidence, mortality, and vocational return in Goteborg, Sweden with a review of the literature. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975; 7: 73-83
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Gracies JM, Burke K, Clegg NJ. et al. Reliability of the Tardieu scale for assessing spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91: 421-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hammer A, Lindmark B. Responsiveness and validity of the Motor Activity Log in patients during the subacute phase after stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2010; 32: 1184-1193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hayes K, Walton JR, Szomor ZR. et al. Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion. Aust J Physiother 2001; 47: 289-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Herrero P, Carrera P, Garcia E. et al. Reliability of goniometric measurements in children with cerebral palsy: A comparative analysis of universal goniometer and electronic inclinometer. A pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011; 12: 155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: A comparison of six methods. Pain 1986; 27: 117-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kleyweg RP, van der Meche FG, Schmitz PI. Interobserver agreement in the assessment of muscle strength and functional abilities in Guillain-Barré syndrome. Muscle Nerve 1991; 14: 1103-1109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kolber MJ, Hanney WJ. The reliability and concurrent validity of shoulder mobility measurements using a digital inclinometer and goniometer: A technical report. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2012; 7: 306-313
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Lemmens RJ, Timmermans AA, Janssen-Potten YJ. et al. Valid and reliable instruments for arm-hand assessment at ICF activity level in persons with hemiplegia: A systematic review. BMC Neurol 2012; 12: 21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lincoln N, Leadbitter D. Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. Physiotherapy 1979; 65: 48-51
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res 1981; 4: 483-492
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Marks D. Spastizität messen. Assessment: Tardieu-Skala. physiopraxis 2009; 05: 38-39
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G. et al. Grip and pinch strength: Normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985; 66: 69-74
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N. et al. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 1985; 39: 386-391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Kashman N. et al. Adult norms for nine hole peg test of finger dexterity. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 1985; 5: 25-38
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Mehrholz J, Major Y, Meissner D. et al. The influence of contractures and variation in measurement stretching velocity on the reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale in patients with severe brain injury. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19: 63-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Meissner D. et al. Reliability of the modified Tardieu scale and the modified Ashworth scale in adult patients with severe brain injury: A comparison study. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19: 751-759
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Mehrholz J. Anhang: Messinstrumente in der neurologischen Rehabilitation. In: Neuroreha nach Schlaganfall. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2011: 220-221
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Meier Khan C, Oesch P. Validity and responsiveness of the German version of the Motor Activity Log for the assessment of self-perceived arm use in hemiplegia after stroke. NeuroRehabilitation 2013; 33: 413-421
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Miller EL, Murray L, Richards L. et al. Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2010; 41: 2402-2448
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Mutlu A, Livanelioglu A, Gunel MK. Reliability of Ashworth and modified Ashworth scales in children with spastic cerebral palsy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008; 9: 44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Nussbaumer S, Leunig M, Glatthorn JF. et al. Validity and test-retest reliability of manual goniometers for measuring passive hip range of motion in femoroacetabular impingement patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010; 11: 194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Oxford Grice K, Vogel KA, Le V. et al. Adult norms for a commercially available nine hole peg test for finger dexterity. Am J Occup Ther 2003; 57: 570-573
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Paternostro-Sluga T, Grim-Stieger M, Posch M. et al. Reliability and validity of the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and a modified scale for testing muscle strength in patients with radial palsy. J Rehabil Med 2008; 40: 665-671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Platz T, Vuadens P, Eickhof C. et al. REPAS, a summary rating scale for resistance to passive movement: Item selection, reliability and validity. Disabil Rehabil 2008; 30: 44-53 DOI: 10.1080/09638280701191743.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Platz T, Fheodoroff K, Mehrholz J. et al. S3-Leitlinie „Rehabilitative Therapie bei Armparese nach Schlaganfall“ der DGNR – Langversion. AWMF; 2020
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Tardieu G, Shentoub S, Delarue R. Research on a technic for measurement of spasticity. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1954; 91: 143-144
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Thomas S, Scheffler B, Elsner B. et al. Testverfahren in der neurologischen Physio- und Ergotherapie. neuroreha 2016; 08: 76-85 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042–105775.
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D. et al. Reliability and validity of the upper-extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke 2005; 36: 2493-2496
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar