Endoscopic ultrasonography can detect a cause in the majority of patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background Idiopathic acute pancreatitis (IAP) has a 25 % pancreatitis recurrence rate. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) may diagnose treatable causes of IAP and hence prevent recurrence. The goal of this systematic review with meta-analysis is to determine the diagnostic yield of EUS and its impact on recurrence.

Methods PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for English studies on EUS in adults with IAP. The primary outcome was diagnostic yield. Secondary outcomes included recurrence. Methodological quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 score. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled diagnostic yield and risk ratio with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model with inverse variance method.

Results 22 studies were included, with 1490 IAP patients who underwent EUS. Overall diagnostic yield was 59 % (874 /1490; 95 %CI 52 % – 66 %). The most common etiologies were biliary (429 /1490; 30 %, 95 %CI 21 % – 41 %) and chronic pancreatitis (271 /1490; 12 %, 95 %CI 8 % – 19 %). In 2 % of patients, neoplasms were detected (45 /1490; 95 %CI 1 % – 4 %). There was no difference in yield between patients with or without recurrent IAP before EUS (risk ratio 0.89, 95 %CI 0.71 – 1.11).

Conclusions EUS is able to identify a potential etiology in the majority of patients with IAP, detecting mostly biliary origin or chronic pancreatitis, but also neoplasms in 2 % of patients. EUS may be associated with a reduction of recurrence rate. Future studies should include complete diagnostic work-up and preferably include patients with a first episode of IAP only.

Publication History

Received: 03 December 2019

Accepted: 22 April 2020

Article published online:
17 June 2020

• References

• 1 Roberts SE, Morrison-Rees S, John A. et al. The incidence and aetiology of acute pancreatitis across Europe. Pancreatology 2017; 17: 155-165
• 2 Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2013; 13: e1-e15
• 3 Wilcox CM, Seay T, Kim H. et al. Prospective endoscopic ultrasound-based approach to the evaluation of idiopathic pancreatitis: causes, response to therapy, and long-term outcome. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111: 1339-1348
• 4 Raty S, Pulkkinen J, Nordback I. et al. Can laparoscopic cholecystectomy prevent recurrent idiopathic acute pancreatitis? A prospective randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 2015; 262: 736-741
• 5 Kirkegard J, Cronin-Fenton D, Heide-Jorgensen U. et al. Acute pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer risk: a nationwide matched-cohort study in Denmark. Gastroenterology 2018;
• 6 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine 2009; 6: e1000097
• 7 Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC. et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA 2000; 283: 2008-2012
• 8 Whiting P, Rutjes A, Westwood M. et al. QUADAS-2: A revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155: 529-536
• 9 Hawes RH, Fockens P. Endosonography. 2nd edn.. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc.; 2011
• 10 DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177-188
• 11 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: The R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2017 Available from (Accessed 19 May 2020): https://www.r-project.org/
• 12 Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. 2011 Available from (Accessed: 15 May 2020): http://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/
• 13 Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ. et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557-560
• 14 Jonathan AC, Sterne ME. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: Guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54: 1046-1055
• 15 Ammori BJ, Boreham B, Lewis P. et al. The biochemical detection of biliary etiology of acute pancreatitis on admission: a revisit in the modern era of biliary imaging. Pancreas 2003; 26: e32-35
• 16 Choudhary NS, Bansal RK, Shah V. et al. Prospective evaluation of yield of endoscopic ultrasonography in the etiological diagnosis of “idiopathic” acute pancreatitis. J Dig Endosc 2016; 7: 133-136
• 17 Frossard JL, Sosa-Valencia L, Amouyal G. et al. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with “idiopathic” acute pancreatitis. Am J Med 2000; 109: 196-200
• 18 Garg PK, Tandon RK, Madan K. Is biliary microlithiasis a significant cause of idiopathic recurrent acute pancreatitis? A long-term follow-up study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 75-79
• 19 Govil A, Agrawal MK, Agrawal D. et al. Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with first episode of idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Indian J Gastroenterol 2014; 33: 241-248
• 20 Kim HS, Moon JH, Choi HJ. et al. The role of intraductal US in the management of idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis without a definite cause on ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 1148-1154
• 21 Liu C-L, Lo C-M, Chan JKF. et al. EUS for detection of occult cholelithiasis in patients with idiopathic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 51: 28-32
• 22 Lopes CV, Pereira-Lima J, Hartmann AA. The role of linear endosonography for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis when other methods failed. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2019; 43: 98-103
• 23 Maes B, Hastier P, Buckley MJM. et al. Extensive aetiological investigations in acute pancreatitis: results of a 1-year prospective study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999; 11: 891-896
• 24 Mariani A, Arcidiacono PG, Curioni S. et al. Diagnostic yield of ERCP and secretin-enhanced MRCP and EUS in patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis of unknown aetiology. Dig Liver Dis 2009; 41: 753-758
• 25 Morris-Stiff G, Al-Allak A, Frost B. et al. Does endoscopic ultrasound have anything to offer in the diagnosis of idiopathic acute pancreatitis?. JOP 2009; 10: 143-146
• 26 Norton SA, Alderson D. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 2000; 97: 1650-1655
• 27 Poves E, del-Pozo D, Tabernero S. et al. Clinical impact of high-definition endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in a district hospital. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 2010; 102: 698-703
• 28 Queneau P-E, Zeeh S, Lapeyre V. et al. Feasibility of and interest in combined endoscopic ultrasonography and biliary drainage in unexplained acute biliopancreatic disorders. Dig Dis Sci 2002; 47: 2020-2024
• 29 Rana SS, Bhasin DK, Rao C. et al. Role of endoscopic ultrasound in idiopathic acute pancreatitis with negative ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Ann Gastroenterol 2012; 25: 133-137
• 30 Repiso Ortega A, Gómez-Rodríguez R, Romero M. et al. Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the etiological diagnosis of “idiopathic” acute pancreatitis. Pancreas 2011; 40: 289-294
• 31 Tandon M, Topazian M. Endoscopic ultrasound in idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 705-709
• 32 Thevenot A, Bournet B, Otal P. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58: 2361-2368
• 33 Vila JJ, Vicuna M, Irisarri R. et al. Diagnostic yield and reliability of endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2010; 45: 375-381
• 34 Yusoff IF, Raymond G, Sahai AV. A prospective comparison of the yield of EUS in primary vs. recurrent idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 673-678
• 35 Zhan X, Guo X, Chen Y. et al. EUS in exploring the etiology of mild acute biliary pancreatitis with a negative finding of biliary origin by conventional radiological methods. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 26: 1500-1503
• 36 Catalano MF, Sahai A, Levy M. et al. EUS-based criteria for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: the Rosemont classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1251-1261
• 37 Hallensleben ND, Umans DS, Bouwense S. et al. The diagnostic work-up and outcomes of ‘presumed’ idiopathic acute pancreatitis: A post-hoc analysis of a multicentre observational cohort. United European Gastroenterol J 2020; 8: 340-350
• 38 DiMagno MJ, Wamsteker EJ. Pancreas divisum. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2011; 13: 150-156
• 39 Pereira R, Eslick G, Cox M. Endoscopic ultrasound for routine assessment in idiopathic acute pancreatitis. J Gastrointest Surg 2019; 23: 1694-1700