CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2020; 08(10): E1220-E1224
DOI: 10.1055/a-1210-4830
Editorial

How to read small bowel capsule endoscopy: a practical guide for everyday use

Emanuele Rondonotti
1   Gastroenterology Unit, Ospedale Valduce, Como, Italy
,
Marco Pennazio
2   University Division of Gastroenterology. City of Health and Science University Hospital, Turin, Italy
,
Ervin Toth
3   Department of Gastroenterology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
,
Anastasios Koulaouzidis
4   Endoscopy Unit, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
› Author Affiliations

Small bowel (SB) capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is often perceived by both patients and physicians as a “lightweight,” noninvasive, comfortable procedure that is easily performed with little more than swallowing a pill and a glass of water. However, “easy to carry out” does not translate to ease of reading or interpretation. A SB capsule acquires thousands of images and generates a long video; however, clinically relevant findings are often seen in only a few frames. There is no way to direct or focus the camera, the capsule’s lens cannot be cleaned or luminal debris removed, and perhaps most importantly, the capsule cannot take tissue samples. Therefore, the rate of missed lesions in the SB has been quoted as high as 10 % [1]. Despite various SB imaging modalities offering similar diagnostic yield (DY) and miss rates, SBCE is one of the few endoscopic procedures open to immense scrutiny, as the data recorded are readily accessible for further on-demand review. This may expose clinicians to additional litigation but conversely, also provides a unique learning platform for new generations of SBCE readers. This is certainly fertile ground for virtual artificial neural network (ANN) training systems and even artificial intelligence (AI) diagnosis [2]. Currently, several different SBCE platforms exist. They differ in technical features and specifications such as size and weight, number and position of cameras, frame rate acquisition, and battery duration, as well as in several functions of proprietary reading software. In this editorial, we aim to provide general principles for SBCE reading, which are only partially addressed in recent technical reviews or guidelines [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]. We would also like to suggest tips and tricks to reduce common deficiencies in SBCE.



Publication History

Article published online:
21 September 2020

© 2020. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Lewis BS, Eisen GM. et al. A pooled analysis to evaluate results of capsule endoscopy trials. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 960-965
  • 2 Leenhardt R, Vasseur P, Li C. et al. CAD-CAP Database Working Group. A neural network algorithm for detection of GI angioectasia during small-bowel capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 189-194
  • 3 Pennazio M, Spada C, Eliakim R. et al. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 352-376
  • 4 Yamamoto H, Ogata H, Matsumoto T. et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for Enteroscopy. Dig Endosc 2017; 29: 519-546
  • 5 Gerson LB, Fidler JL, Cave DR. et al. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Small Bowel Bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 1265-1287
  • 6 Rondonotti E, Spada C, Adler S. et al. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 423-446
  • 7 Enns RA, Hookey L, Armstrong D. et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the use of video capsule endoscopy. Gastroenterology 2017; 152: 497-514
  • 8 Oliva S, Thomson M, de Ridder L. et al. Endoscopy in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Position Paper on Behalf of the Porto IBD Group of the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2018; 67: 414-430
  • 9 Faigel DO, Baron TH, Adler DG. et al. ASGE. ASGE guideline: guidelines for credentialing and granting privileges for capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 503-505
  • 10 Lo S. How should we do capsule endoscopy reading?. Tech Gastroint Endosc 2006; 8: 146-148
  • 11 Barkin JA, Barkin JS. Video capsule endoscopy teaching, reading and troubleshooting. Gastrointest Clin N Am 2017; 27: 15-27
  • 12 Lewis SB. How to read capsule endoscopy images. Gastrointest Clin N Am 2004; 14: 11-26
  • 13 Freitas M, Arieira C, Carvalho PB. et al. Simplify to improve in capsule endoscopy - top 100 is a swift and reliable evaluation tool for the small bowel inflammatory activity in Crohnʼs disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2020; 55: 408-413
  • 14 Saurin JC, Lapalus MG, Cholet F. et al. Can we shorten the small-bowel capsule reading time with the “Quick-view” image detection system. Dig Liver Dis 2012; 44: 477-581
  • 15 Gomes C, Pinho R, Ponte A. et al. Evaluation of the sensitivity of the Express View® in the Mirocam capsule endoscopy software. Scand J Gastroenterol 2020; 55: 371-375
  • 16 Worsoe J, Fynne L, Gregersen T. et al. Gastric transit and small bowel transit time and motility assessed by a magnet tracking system. BMC Gastroenterol 2011; 29: 145
  • 17 Davie M, Yung DE, Douglas S. et al. Mapping the distribution of small bowel angioectasias. Scand J Gastroenterol 2019; 54: 597-602
  • 18 Girelli CM, Porta P, Colombo E. et al. Development of a novel index to discriminate bulge from mass on small bowel capsule endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1067-1074
  • 19 Saurin JC, Delvaux M, Vahedi K. et al. Clinical impact of capsule endoscopy compared to push enteroscopy: 1-year follow-up study. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 318-323
  • 20 Gralnek IM, Defranchis R, Seidman E. et al. Development of a capsule endoscopy scoring index for small bowel mucosal inflammatory change. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008; 27: 146-154
  • 21 Gal E, Geller A, Fraser G. et al. Assessment and validation of the new capsule endoscopy Crohnʼs disease activity index (CECDAI). Dig Dis Sci 2008; 53: 1933-1937
  • 22 Koffas A, Laskaratos FM, Epstein O. Non-small bowel lesion detection at small bowel capsule endoscopy: a comprehensive literature review. World J Clin Cases 2018; 6: 901-907
  • 23 Li X, Chen H, Dai J. et al. Predictive role of capsule endoscopy on the insertion route of double-balloon enteroscopy. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 762-766
  • 24 Ponte A, Pinho R, Rodrigues A. et al. Review of small-bowel cleansing scales in capsule endoscopy: A panoply of choices. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8: 600-609
  • 25 Yung DE, Boal Carvalho P, Giannakou A. et al. Clinical validity of flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE) in small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 258-269
  • 26 Read AJ, Rice MD, Conjeevaram HS. et al. A deeper look at the small bowel: training pathways in video capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy. Dig Dis Sci 2018; 63: 2210-2219
  • 27 Koffas A, Laskaratos FM, Epstein O. Training in video capsule endoscopy: current status and unmet needs. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 11: 395-402
  • 28 Iakovidis DK, Koulaouzidis A. Automatic lesion detection in capsule endoscopy based on color saliency: closer to an essential adjunct for reviewing software. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80: 877-883