neuroreha 2020; 12(03): 132-137
DOI: 10.1055/a-1212-6352
Aus der Praxis

Defizite in der sensomotorischen Integration bei Pusher-Symptomatik

Dörte Zietz
,
Leif Johannsen

Wer regelmäßig mit Patienten arbeitet, die Pusher-Symptomatik zeigen, weiß, wie kräftezehrend die Mobilisation bei Bewegungstherapie und Pflege nicht nur für den Patienten selbst, sondern auch für die Therapeuten und Pflegepersonen sein kann. Zuerst muss die Pusher-Symptomatik behandelt werden, bevor andere Ziele der sensomotorischen Rehabilitation, wie z. B. das Stehen und Gehen, anvisiert werden können. Der Artikel beschreibt die Hintergründe und die therapeutischen Ansätze, auch wenn es bisher keinen Goldstandard der Therapie gibt.



Publication History

Article published online:
08 September 2020

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Stuttgart · New York

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Davies PM. Steps to follow: The comprehensive treatment of patients with hemiplegia. Berlin: Springer; 2000
  • 2 Karnath HO, Ferber S, Dichgans J. The origin of contraversive pushing: Evidence for a second graviceptive system in humans. Neurology 2000; 55 (09) 1298-1304
  • 3 D’Aquila MA. et al. Validation of a lateropulsion scale for patients recovering from stroke. Clin Rehabil 2004; 18 (01) 102-109
  • 4 Baccini M. et al. Scale for contraversive pushing: Cutoff scores for diagnosing „pusher behavior“ and construct validity. Phys Ther 2008; 88 (08) 947-955
  • 5 Bergmann J. et al. A new cutoff score for the Burke Lateropulsion Scale improves validity in the classification of pusher behavior in subactue stroke patients. Gait & Posture 2019; 68: 514-517
  • 6 Abe H. et al. Prevalence and length of recovery of pusher syndrome based on cerebral hemispheric lesion side in patients with acute stroke. Stroke 2012; 43 (06) 1654-1656
  • 7 Pedersen PM. et al. Ipsilateral pushing in stroke: Incidence, relation to neuropsychological symptoms, and impact on rehabilitation. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77 (01) 25-28
  • 8 Karnath HO. et al. Posterior thalamic hemorrhage induces „pusher syndrome“. Neurology 2005; 64 (06) 1014-1019
  • 9 Karnath HO. et al. Prognosis of contraversive pushing. J Neurol 2002; 249 (09) 1250-1253
  • 10 Broetz D, Johannsen L, Karnath HO. Time course of pusher syndrome under visual feedback treatment. Physiother Res Int 2004; 9 (03) 138-143
  • 11 Babyar SR, Peterson MG, Reding M. Time to recovery from lateropulsion dependent on key stroke deficits: A retrospective analysis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2015; 29 (03) 207-213
  • 12 Johannsen LB, Fruhmann BM, Karnath HO. Subjective visual vertical (SVV) determined in a representative sample of 15 patients with pusher syndrome. J Neurol 2006; 253 (10) 1367-1369
  • 13 Bergmann J. et al. The subjective postural vertical determined in patients with pusher behavior during standing. Top Stroke Rehabil 2016; 23 (03) 184-190
  • 14 Johannsen L, Broetz D, Karnath HO. Leg orientation as a clinical sign for pusher syndrome. BMC Neurol 2006; 6: 30
  • 15 Dieterich M, Brandt T. Perception of verticality and vestibular disorders of balance and falls. Front Neurol 2019; 10: 172
  • 16 Karnath HO, Ferber S, Dichgans J. The neural representation of postural control in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97 (25) 13931-13936
  • 17 Baier B. et al. Pusher syndrome: Its cortical correlate. J Neurol 2012; 259 (02) 277-283
  • 18 Lafosse C. et al. Postural abnormalities and contraversive pushing following right hemisphere brain damage. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2007; 17 (03) 374-396
  • 19 Perennou DA. et al. Understanding the pusher behavior of some stroke patients with spatial deficits: A pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83 (04) 570-575
  • 20 Bergmann J. et al. Robot-assisted gait training to reduce pusher behavior: A randomized controlled trial. Neurology 2018; 91 (14) e1319-e1327