Schwangerschaft und Geburt nach künstlicher Befruchtung

Aufgrund verschiedener gesellschaftlicher Veränderungen nutzen zunehmend Frauen und Paare in Deutschland die Möglichkeit einer Kinderwunschbehandlung. Gleichzeitig wurden viele unterschiedliche Varianten künstlicher Befruchtung entwickelt oder verbessert. Der Artikel hinterfragt Chancen und Risiken der Methoden und zieht Schlussfolgerungen für die Praxis.

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
30. Oktober 2020

• Literatur

• 1 Allotey J, Stallings E, Bonet M. et al. Clinical manifestations, risk factors, and maternal and perinatal outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: living systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2020; 370 doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3320
• 2 AWMF-RegNr. 015-025 Leitlinienklasse S2k. Prävention und Therapie der Frühgeburt. Stand: Februar 2020
• 3 Capobianco G, Saderi L, Aliberti S. et al. COVID-19 in pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020; 252: 543-558. doi: 10.1016 / j.ejogrb.2020.07.006
• 4 Dayan N, Joseph KS, Fell DB. et al. Infertility treatment and risk of severe maternal morbidity: a propensity score – matched cohort study. CMAJ 2019; 191 (05) ) E118-E127;
• 5 Gao Y, Ye L, Zhang J. et al. Clinical features and outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis 2020; 20: 564 . 10.1186/s12879-020-05274-2
• 6 Maheshwari A, Pandey S, Shetty A. et al. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2012; 98 (02) : 368-77. e1-9. doi: 10.1016 / j.fertnstert.2012.05.019
• 7 Marino JL, Moore VM, Willson KJ. et al. Perinatal Outcomes by Mode of Assisted Conception and Sub-Fertility in an Australian Data Linkage Cohort. PLoSOne. 2014 10.1371/journal.pone.0080398
• 8 Pelkonen S, Koivunen R, Gissler M. et al. Perinatal outcome of children born after frozen and fresh embryotransfer: the Finnish cohort study 1995–2006. Hum Reprod 2010; 25 (04) : 914-23.
• 9 Pinborg A, Loft A, Aaris Henningsen AK. et al. Infant outcome of 957 singletons born after frozen embryo replacement: the Danish National Cohort Study. Fertil Steril 2010; 94 (04) : 1320-1327.
• 10 Unicef Data: Monitoring the situation of children and women. Neonatal mortality September 2020. Im Internet: https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-survival/neonatal-mortality/. Stand: 13.09.2020.
• 11 Wada I, Macnamee MC, Wick K. et al. Birth characteristics and perinatal outcome of babies conceived from cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod 1994; 9 (03) : 543-6.
• 12 Wang YA, Sullivan EA, Black D. et al. Preterm birth and low birth weight after assisted reproductive technology-related pregnancy in Australia between 1996 and 2000. Fertil Steril 2005; 83 (06) : 1650-8.
• 13 Zhao J, Yan Y, Huang X. et al. Do the children born after assisted reproductive technology have an increased risk of birth defects? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020; 33 (02) : 322-333,