Z Orthop Unfall 2022; 160(02): 172-182
DOI: 10.1055/a-1298-4949
Original Article/Originalarbeit

Epidemiological and Therapeutic Developments in Pelvic Ring Fractures Type C from 2004 to 2014 – a Retrospective Data Analysis of 2,042 Patients in the German Pelvic Register (DGU)

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Patricia Lang
1   Clinic for Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, German Federal Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Germany
,
Kerstin Schwabe
2   Clinic for General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Federal Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Germany
,
Hans-Joachim Riesner
1   Clinic for Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, German Federal Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Germany
,
Benedikt Friemert
1   Clinic for Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, German Federal Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Germany
,
Fabian Stuby
3   Trauma Surgery, Trauma Clinic Murnau, Germany
,
4   University Surgical Clinic – Orthopaedic Surgery, University Clinics Erlangen, Germany
,
AG Becken III der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie › Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background Pelvic ring fractures type C present a special challenge due to their high instability, the possible accompanying injuries and the high mortality rate of up to 18.9%. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to use the data from the DGU pelvic register to identify changes in the epidemiology and therapy for type C pelvic ring fractures between 2004 and 2014.

Materials and Methods 2,042 patients with type C pelvic ring injury were retrospectively included. Three time periods with roughly equal patient groups were specified and differences in epidemiology and the type of therapy were evaluated. For the surgical cases, the time of the operation, the duration of the operation, blood loss, the location of the fracture and the type of osteosynthesis were evaluated and the reduction result was recorded.

Results For the period under review, there is an age shift in the incidence of a type C pelvic ring fracture towards older age. The isolated pelvic injury has increased, while the proportion of pelvic injuries in the context of polytrauma has steadily decreased. Complications and mortality decreased as a percentage. The tendency towards minimally invasive procedures could be shown in the surgical care. Navigated procedures in the area of the pelvic ring have so far not proven successful.

Conclusions We were able to show that the majority of the patients are increasingly old, that there is no relevant trauma in the history and that there is an increase in the isolated pelvic fracture type C and a decrease in the number of polytraumatised or multiply injured patients. In conjunction with mortality from pelvic ring injuries, the successes of standardised, pelvic-specific emergency management, an adapted time of operation outside the vulnerable phase and stable osteosynthesis care, which enable early functional follow-up treatment, are also evident.



Publication History

Article published online:
21 January 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References/Literatur

  • 1 Tosounidis G, Holstein JH, Culemann U. et al. Changes in epidemiology and treatment of pelvic ring fractures in Germany: an analysis on data of German Pelvic Multicenter Study Groups I and III (DGU/AO). Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2010; 77: 450-456
  • 2 Sullivan MP, Baldwin KD, Donegan DJ. et al. Geriatric fractures about the hip: divergent patterns in the proximal femur, acetabulum, and pelvis. Orthopedics 2014; 37: 151-157
  • 3 Rollmann M, Herath S, Kirchhoff F. et al. Pelvic ring fractures in the elderly now and then – a pelvic registry. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2017; 71: 83-88
  • 4 Meinberg EG, Agel J, Roberts CS. et al. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma 2018; 32 (Suppl. 01) S1-S170
  • 5 Rommens PM, Wagner D, Hofmann A. Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis. JBJS Rev 2017; DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.16.00057.
  • 6 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie e.V. (DGU), AG Becken. Tätigkeitsbericht 2013. Accessed April 20, 2020 at: https://www.dgu-online.de/fileadmin/published_content/7.Ueber_uns/Arbeitsgemeinschaften/Becken/PDF/DGU_AG_Becken_Taetigkeitsbericht_20131.pdf
  • 7 Oestern HJ, Tscherne H, Sturm J. et al. Classification of the severity of injury. Unfallchirurg 1985; 88: 465-472
  • 8 Matta JM, Tornetta P. Internal fixation of unstable pelvic ring injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; (329) 129-140
  • 9 Arduini M, Saturnino L, Piperno A. et al. Fragility fractures of the pelvis: treatment and preliminary results. Aging Clin Exp Res 2015; 27 (Suppl. 01) S61-S67
  • 10 Destatis. Statistisches Bundesamt. Gesellschaft und Umwelt, Unfälle. Accessed April 20, 2020 at: http://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Verkehrsunfaelle/_inhalt.html
  • 11 Balogh Z, King KL, Mackay P. et al. The epidemiology of pelvic ring fractures: a population-based study. J Trauma 2007; 63: 1066-1073
  • 12 Marrinan S, Pearce MS, Jiang XY. et al. Admission for osteoporotic pelvic fractures and predictors of length of hospital stay, mortality and loss of independence. Age Ageing 2015; 44: 258-261
  • 13 Köhler D, Sellei RM, Sop A. et al. Effects of pelvic volume changes on retroperitoneal and intra-abdominal pressure in the injured pelvic ring: a cadaveric model. J Trauma 2011; 71: 585-590
  • 14 Clarke JR, Trooskin SZ, Doshi PJ. et al. Time to laparotomy for intra-abdominal bleeding from trauma does affect survival for delays up to 90 minutes. J Trauma 2002; 52: 420-425
  • 15 Pohlemann T, Stengel D, Tosounidis G. et al. Survival trends and predictors of mortality in severe pelvic trauma: estimates from the German Pelvic Trauma Registry Initiative. Injury 2011; 42: 997-1002
  • 16 Prasarn ML, Conrad B, Small J. et al. Comparison of circumferential pelvic sheeting versus the T-POD on unstable pelvic injuries: A cadaveric study of stability. Injury 2013; 44: 1756-1759
  • 17 Fleiter N, Reimertz C, Lustenberger T. et al. Bedeutung der korrekten Positionierung eines Beckengurts zur temporären Stabilisierung von Beckenringverletzungen. Z Orthop Unfall 2012; 150: 627-629
  • 18 Broos P, Vanderschot P, Crannix L. et al. The operative treatment of unstable pelvic ring fractures. Int Surg 1992; 77: 303-308
  • 19 Pohlemann T, Krettek C, Hoffmann R. et al. Biomechanischer Vergleich verschiedener Notfallstabilisierungsmaßnahmen am Beckenring. Unfallchirurg 1994; 97: 503-510
  • 20 Simpson T, Krieg JC, Heuer F. et al. Stabilization of Pelvic Ring Disruptions with a Circumferential Sheet. J Trauma 2002; 52: 158-161
  • 21 Waikakul S, Harnroongroj T, Vanadurongwan V. Immediate stabilization of unstable pelvic fractures versus delayed stabilization. J Med Assoc Thai 1999; 82: 637-642
  • 22 Tosounidis TI, Giannoudis PV. Pelvic fractures presenting with haemodynamic instability: treatment options and outcomes. Surgeon 2013; 11: 344-351
  • 23 White CE, Hsu JR, Holcomb JB. Haemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. Injury 2009; 40: 1023-1030
  • 24 Tosounidis G, Culemann U, Stengel D. et al. Das komplexe Beckentrauma des älteren Patienten. Unfallchirurg 2010; 113: 281-286
  • 25 Bodzay T, Szita J, Mano S. et al. Biomechanical comparison of two stabilization techniques for unstable sacral fractures. J Orthop Sci 2012; 17: 574-579
  • 26 Hauschild O, Strohm PC, Culemann U. et al. Mortality in Patients with Pelvic Fractures: Results from the German Pelvic Injury Register. J Trauma 2008; 64: 449-455
  • 27 Culemann U, Oestern HJ, Pohlemann T. Aktuelle Behandlung der Beckenringfraktur. Unfallchirurg 2014; 117: 145-159
  • 28 Tschoeke SK, Hellmuth M, Hostmann A. et al. The early second hit in trauma management augments the proinflammatory immune response to multiple injuries. J Trauma 2007; 62: 1396-1403
  • 29 Routt ML, Simonian PT, Swiontkowski MF. Stabilization of pelvic ring disruptions. Orthop Clin North Am 1997; 28: 369-388
  • 30 Pohlemann T, Gänsslen A, Schellwald O. et al. Outcome after pelvic ring injuries. Injury 1996; 27 (Suppl. 02) B31-B38
  • 31 Riepl C, Beck A, Kraus M. Präklinisches Management von Beckenverletzungen. Notarzt 2012; 28: 125-136
  • 32 Gänsslen A, Pohlemann T, Paul C. et al. Epidemiology of pelvic ring injuries. Injury 1996; 27 (Suppl. 01) S-A13-A20
  • 33 Pohlemann T, Tosounidis G, Culemann U. Das komplexe Beckentrauma des älteren Patienten. Unfallchirurg 2010; 113: 258-271
  • 34 Dienstknecht T, Pfeifer R, Horst K. et al. The long-term clinical outcome after pelvic ring injuries. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B: 548-553
  • 35 Rommens PM, Hofmann A. Comprehensive classification of fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: Recommendations for surgical treatment. Injury 2013; 44: 1733-1744
  • 36 Lindahl J, Hirvensalo E, Böstman O. et al. Failure of reduction with an external fixator in the management of injuries of the pelvic ring. Long-term evaluation of 110 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81: 955-956
  • 37 Mardanpour K, Rahbar M. The outcome of surgically treated traumatic unstable pelvic fractures by open reduction and internal fixation. J Inj Violence Res 2013; 5: 77-83
  • 38 Felix S, Hanschen M, Biberthaler P. Blutungskontrolle bei Beckenverletzungen. Trauma Berufskrankh 2016; 18: 173-180
  • 39 Ruchholtz S, Bücking B, Schulz R-J. Hrsg. Alterstraumatologie. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2016
  • 40 Pavić R, Margetić P. Emergency treatment for clinically unstable patients with pelvic fracture and haemorrhage. Coll Antropol 2012; 36: 1445-1452