CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2021; 09(03): E306-E312
DOI: 10.1055/a-1336-2460
Original article

Effectiveness of counter traction using a clip with a looped thread for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Naohiko Indo
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Yodogawa Christian Hospital, Osaka, Japan
2   Kohshinkai Gastroenterological Endoscopic Clinic, Osaka, Japan
,
Takahiro Anami
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Yodogawa Christian Hospital, Osaka, Japan
,
Yasuaki Kitamura
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Yodogawa Christian Hospital, Osaka, Japan
,
Akihiko Watanabe
1   Department of Gastroenterology, Yodogawa Christian Hospital, Osaka, Japan
› Author Affiliations

Introduction

Colorectal cancer is the third most common type of cancer and the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality in the world [1]. Endoscopic resection of adenomatous polyps is reported to reduce the incidence of colorectal cancer [2]. However, polyps that are large and those that are removed piecemeal are risk factors for residual neoplasia [3]. Therefore, colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been found to have a high en bloc resection rate compared with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) [4]. In recent years, colorectal ESD has become a common endoscopic procedure. However, in Western countries, colorectal ESD is not the standard treatment for large colorectal lesions [5] [6] because the procedure is challenging and the rate of perforation is higher than that for EMR [7]. These challenges are attributable to the fact that the colorectal wall is thin and the maneuvering ability of the endoscope in the colon is limited. In addition, several factors pertaining to technical difficulties have been reported [8] [9]. To ensure smooth and safe performance of colorectal ESD, it is important to maintain appropriate visibility of the submucosal layer in an easy and quick manner. Therefore, we developed a treatment strategy for colorectal ESD using a clip with a looped thread (LT) [10]. This traction method is cost-effective as well as easy to perform compared with previously reported methods. The present study was designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this novel traction method.



Publication History

Received: 02 June 2020

Accepted: 11 November 2020

Article published online:
18 February 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394-424
  • 2 Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ. et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 687-696
  • 3 Woodward TA, Heckman MG, Cleveland P. et al. Predictors of complete endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed gastrointestinal neoplasia of the colon. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107: 650-654
  • 4 Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T. et al. Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 343-352
  • 5 Shinozaki S, Hayashi Y, Lefor AK. et al. What is the best therapeutic strategy for colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasia? Future perspectives from the East. Dig Endosc 2016; 28: 289-295
  • 6 Burgess NG, Bourke MJ. Endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions: The narrowing divide between East and West. Dig Endosc 2016; 28: 296-305
  • 7 Arezzo A, Passera R, Marchese N. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions. United Eur Gastroenterol J 2016; 4: 18-29
  • 8 Hori K, Uraoka T, Harada K. et al. Predictive factors for technically difficult endoscopic submucosal dissection in the colorectum. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 862-870
  • 9 Takeuchi Y, Iishi H, Tanaka S. et al. Factors associated with technical difficulties and adverse events of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: retrospective exploratory factor analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort. Int J Colorectal Dis 2014; 29: 1275-1284
  • 10 Indo N, Anami T, Asaji N. et al. Easy and effective counter-traction using a clip with a looped thread for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 2019; 51: E233-E234
  • 11 Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma 3rd ed. J Anus Rectum Colon 2019; 3: 175-195
  • 12 Participants in the Paris Workshop. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: S3-S43
  • 13 Oyama T, Shimaya S, Tomori A. et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection using a hooking knife (hooking EMR). Stomach Intest 2002; 37: 1155-1161
  • 14 Yamasaki Y, Takeuchi Y, Uedo N. et al. Traction-assisted colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection using clip and line: a feasibility study. Endosc Int Open 2015; 04: E51-E55
  • 15 Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 48: 452-458
  • 16 Ota M, Nakamura T, Hayashi K. et al. Usefulness of clip traction in the early phase of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Endosc 2012; 24: 315-318
  • 17 Koike Y, Hirasawa D, Fujita N. et al. Usefulness of the thread-traction method in esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection: randomized controlled trial. Dig Endosc 2015; 27: 303-309
  • 18 Xie X, Bai JY, Fan CQ. et al. Application of clip traction in endoscopic submucosal dissection to the treatment of early esophageal carcinoma and precancerous lesions. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 462-468
  • 19 Sakamoto N, Osada T, Shibuya T. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of large colorectal tumors by using a novel spring-action S-O clip for traction (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1370-1374
  • 20 Sakamoto H, Hayashi Y, Miura Y. et al. Pocket-creation method facilitates endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal laterally spreading tumors, non-granular type. Endosc Int Open 2017; 05: E123-E129
  • 21 Okamoto K, Muguruma N, Kitamura S. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for large colorectal tumors using a cross-counter technique and a novel large-diameter balloon overtube. Dig Endosc 2012; 24: 96-99
  • 22 Yamada S, Doyama H, Ota R. et al. Impact of the clip and snare method using the prelooping technique for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 281-385
  • 23 Yamamoto K, Hayashi S, Saiki H. et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for large superficial colorectal tumors using the clip-flap method. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 262-265
  • 24 Mori H, Kobara H, Nishiyama N. et al. Novel effective and repeatedly available ring-thread counter traction for safer colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc 2017; 31: 3040-3047
  • 25 Jacques J, Charissoux A, Legros R. et al. Double-clip counter-traction using a rubber band is a useful and adaptive tool for colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 179-181