Functional endoscopy in neurogenic dysphagia: a feasibility study focusing on the esophageal phase of swallowing

Abstract

Background and study aims Due to demographic transition, neurogenic dysphagia has become an increasingly recognized problem. Patients suffering from dysphagia often get caught between different clinical disciplines. In this study, we implemented a defined examination protocol for evaluating the whole swallowing process by functional endoscopy. Special focus was put on the esophageal phase of swallowing.

Patients and methods This prospective observational multidisciplinary study evaluated 31 consecutive patients with suspected neurogenic dysphagia by transnasal access applying an ultrathin video endoscope. Thirty-one patients with gastroesophageal reflux symptoms were used as a control group. We applied a modified approach including standardized endoscopic positions to compare our findings with fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and high-resolution manometry. The primary outcome measure was feasibility of functional endoscopy. Secondary outcome measures were adverse events (AEs), tolerability, and pathologic endoscopic findings.

Results Functional endoscopy was successfully performed in all patients. No AEs were recorded. A variety of disorders were documented by functional endoscopy: incomplete or delayed closure of the upper esophageal sphincter in retroflex view, clearance disturbance of tubular esophagus, esophageal hyperperistalsis, and hypomotility. Analysis of results obtained with the diagnostic tools showed some discrepancies.

Conclusions By interdisciplinary cooperation with additional assessment of the esophageal phase of deglutition using the innovative method of functional endoscopy, the diagnosis of neurogenic disorders including dysphagia may be significantly improved, leading to a better clinical understanding of complex dysfunctional patterns. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to show that a retroflex view of the ultrathin video endoscope within the esophagus can be safely performed. [NCT01995929]

Publication History

Received: 17 August 2020

Accepted: 30 December 2020

Article published online:
15 April 2021

• References

• 1 Dziweas R, Warnecke T. Neurogene Dysphagien: Diagnostik und Therapie. Kohlhammer Verlag; 2013
• 2 Matsuo K, Palmer JB. Anatomy and physiology of feeding and swallowing: Normal and abnormal. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2008; 19: 691-707
• 3 Dziewas R, Glahn J, Helfer C. et al. Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) for neurogenic dysphagia: Training curriculum of the German Society of Neurology and the German stroke society. BMC Medical Education 2016; 16: 70
• 4 Martino R, Foley N, Bhogal S. et al. Dysphagia after stroke: Incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke 2005; 36: 2756-2763
• 5 Müller J, Wenning GK, Verny M. et al. Progression of dysarthria and dysphagia in postmortem-confirmed Parkinsonian disorders. Arch Neurol 2001; 58: 259-264
• 6 Morgan AS, Mackay LE. Causes and complications associated with swallowing disorders in traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1999; 14: 454-461
• 7 Ates F, Vaezi MF. The Pathogenesis and Management of Achalasia: Current Status and Future Directions. Gut Liver 2015; 9: 449-463
• 8 Wirth R, Dziewas R. Neurogene Dysphagie. Internist 2017; 58: 132-140
• 9 Prosiegel M. Neurogene Dysphagien. Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie. 2015
• 10 Farneti D, Consolmagno P. The Swallowing Centre: Rationale for a multidisciplinary management. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica 2007; 27: 200-207
• 11 Langmore SE, Schatz K, Olsen N. Fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing safety: A new procedure. Dysphagia 1988; 2: 216-219
• 12 Pandolfino JE, Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ. et al. High-resolution manometry in clinical practice: Utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalities. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2009; 21: 796-806
• 13 Baijens LW, Clavé P, Cras P. et al. European Society for Swallowing Disorders – European Union Geriatric Medicine Society white paper: Oropharyngeal dysphagia as a geriatric syndrome. Clin Interv Aging 2016; 11: 1403-1428
• 14 Bollschweiler E, Knoppe K, Wolfgarten E. et al. Prevalence of dysphagia in patients with gastroesophageal reflux in Germany. Dysphagia 2008; 23: 172-176
• 15 Herrmann IF, Recio SA. Functional pharyngoesophagoscopy: A new technique for diagnostics and analyzing deglutition. Oper Techniq Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 8: 163-167
• 16 Arens C, Herrmann IF, Rohrbach S. et al. Positionspapier der DGHNO und der DGPP - Stand der klinischen und endoskopischen Diagnostik, Evaluation und Therapie von Schluckstörungen bei Kindern und Erwachsenen. Laryngorhinootologie 2015; 94: S306-S354
• 17 Langmore SE. Endoscopic evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders. New York: Thieme; 2001
• 18 Pandolfino JE. High-resolution manometry: Is it better for detecting esophageal disease?. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 6: 632-634
• 19 High-Resolution-Manometrie des Ösophagus: Bildatlas und Lehrbuch. Weingart V, Schönfeld A. Karlsruhe: Standard Light; 2012
• 20 van Hoeij FB, Bredenoord AJ. Clinical application of esophageal high-resolution manometry in the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016; 22: 6-13
• 21 Kahrilas PJ. Esophageal motor disorders in terms of high-resolution esophageal pressure topography: What has changed?. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 981-987
• 22 Medtronic. Medtronic ManoScan ESO Brochure. 2019 https://www.medwrench.com/documents/view/10314/medtronic-manoscan-eso-brochure-pdf Accessed: 30.06.2020
• 23 Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Rice J. et al. Impaired deglutitive EGJ relaxation in clinical esophageal manometry: A quantitative analysis of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2007; 293: G878-G885
• 24 Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M. et al. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015; 27: 160-174
• 25 Carlson DA, Pandolfino JE. High-resolution manometry in clinical practice. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 11: 374-384
• 26 Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Kahrilas PJ. et al. Chicago classification criteria of esophageal motility disorders defined in high resolution esophageal pressure topography. Neurogastroentero Motil 2012; 24: 57-65
• 27 Kuribayashi S, Iwakiri K, Kawada A. et al. Variant parameter values-as defined by the Chicago Criteria-produced by ManoScan and a new system with Unisensor catheter. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015; 27: 188-194
• 28 Goetz CG, Poewe W, Rascol O. et al. Movement Disorder Society Task Force report on the Hoehn and Yahr staging scale: Status and recommendations. Mov Disord 2004; 19: 1020-1028
• 29 Rohof WOA, Bredenoord AJ. Chicago Classification of Esophageal Motility Disorders: Lessons Learned. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2017; 19: 37
• 30 Mielens JD, Hoffman MR, Ciucci MR. et al. Automated analysis of pharyngeal pressure data obtained with high-resolution manometry. Dysphagia 2011; 26: 3-12
• 31 Wang YT, Yazaki E, Sifrim D. High-resolution manometry: esophageal disorders not addressed by the “Chicago Classification”. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 18: 365-372
• 32 O'Sullivan SS, Massey LA, Williams DR. et al. Clinical outcomes of progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy. Brain 2008; 131: 1362-1372
• 33 Warnecke T, Oelenberg S, Teismann I. et al. Endoscopic characteristics and levodopa responsiveness of swallowing function in progressive supranuclear palsy. Movement Disorders 2010; 25: 1239-1245
• 34 Bredenoord AJ. Minor disorders of esophageal peristalsis: highly prevalent, minimally relevant?. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13: 1424-1425
• 35 Hoogenboom SA, Bagci U, Wallace MB. AI in gastroenterology. The current state of play and the potential. How will it affect our practice and when?. Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2019; 150634
• 36 Vaughn B, Rotolo S, Roth H. Circadian rhythm and sleep influences on digestive physiology and disorders. CPT 2014. 67