Feasibility of an EUS e-training course with live cases

Abstract

Background and study aims One-on-one endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) mentorship was not possible at most institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic. We decided to test the feasibility of structured training in EUS with virtual e-classes with live cases. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a virtual EUS training course with objective end points.

Patients and methods Twenty-one trainees were trained on a virtual platform over 16 classes of 90 minutes each, over 3 months. The virtual training screen had two equal parts, one showing the endoscopist’s hand movements, and another the resultant EUS display. The course curriculum included EUS anatomy of the mediastinum, pancreatico-biliary region and rectum. The assessment was done on videos of procedures performed by trainees.

Results Twenty trainees performed 251 EUS procedures (range 8–25, mean 12.5 ± 4.9) at their institutions. At the end of the course, all students (100 %) could maneuver the echo-endoscope through to the duodenum. Fifteen trainees sent a video for final assessment. The successful specified area identification rates were 12 of 15 (80 %) for the subcarinal space, 10 of15 (66.6 %) for the head of the pancreas, 10 of 15 (66.6 %) for the common bile duct, and nine of 15 (60 %) for the tail of pancreas. The success rate of ability to get appropriate windows was 10 of 15 (67 %) for the subcarinal space, eight of 15 (53.3 %) for the head of the pancreas, seven of 15 (46.6 %) for the common bile duct and six of 15 (40 %) for the tail of pancreas. No adverse events were reported.

Conclusions A virtual EUS training course with live cases appears feasible. It allows the possibility of training a large number of students. Further evaluation is needed, especially of virtual assessment methods and training benchmarks.

Publication History

Received: 19 February 2021

Accepted: 22 March 2021

Article published online:
16 July 2021

• References

• 1 Faulx AL, Lightdale JR, Acosta RD. et al. Guidelines for privileging, credentialing, and proctoring to perform GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: 273-281
• 2 Siddiqui UD, Aslanian HR. The new virtual reality: advanced endoscopy education in the COVID-19 era. Digest Dis Sci 2020; 65: 1888-1891
• 3 Wani S, Keswani RN, Petersen B. et al. Training in EUS and ERCP: standardizing methods to assess competence. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 1371-1382
• 4 Ho KY. Survey of endoscopic ultrasonographic practice and training in the Asia-Pacific region. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 21: 1231-1235
• 5 Wani S, Han S, Simon V. et al. Setting minimum standards for training in EUS and ERCP: results from a prospective multicenter study evaluating learning curves and competence among advanced endoscopy trainees. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: 1160-1168
• 6 Polkowski M, Larghi A, Weynand B. et al. Learning, techniques, and complications of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)- guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Guideline. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 190-206
• 7 Dhir V, Itoi T, Fockens P. et al. Novel ex vivo model for handson teaching of and training in EUS-guided biliary drainage: creation of “Mumbai EUS” stereolithography/3D printing bile duct prototype (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 440-446
• 8 Wang MH, Dy F, Vu VK. et al. Structured endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) training program improved knowledge and skills of trainees: results from the Asian EUS Group. Dig Endosc 2015; 27: 687-691
• 9 Barthet M, Gasmi M, Giovannini M. et al. EUS training in a live pig model: does it improve echoendoscope hands-on and trainee competence?. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 535-539