Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2022; 82(04): 410-419
DOI: 10.1055/a-1515-2801
GebFra Science
Review/Übersicht

Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes – Inpatient Versus Outpatient Management: an Evidence-Based Review

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Werner Rath
1   Medizinische Fakultät, Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
,
Holger Maul
2   Frauenkliniken der Asklepios Kliniken Barmbek, Wandsbek und Nord-Heidberg, c/o. Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany
,
Ioannis Kyvernitakis
2   Frauenkliniken der Asklepios Kliniken Barmbek, Wandsbek und Nord-Heidberg, c/o. Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany
,
Patrick Stelzl
3   Universitätsklinik für Gynäkologie, Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologische Endokrinologie, Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Linz, Austria
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

According to current guidelines, inpatient management until birth is considered standard in pregnant women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). With the increasing burden on obstetric departments and the growing importance of satisfaction and right to self-determination in pregnant women, outpatient management in PPROM is a possible alternative to inpatient monitoring. The most important criterion for this approach is to ensure the safety of both the mother and the child. Due to the small number of cases (n = 116), two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing inpatient and outpatient management were unable to draw any conclusions. By 2020, eight retrospective comparative studies (cohort/observational studies) yielded the following outcomes: no significant differences in the rate of maternal complications (e.g., chorioamnionitis, premature placental abruption, umbilical cord prolapse) and in neonatal morbidity, significantly prolonged latency period with higher gestational age at birth, higher birth weight of neonates, and significantly shorter length of stay of preterm infants in neonatal intensive care, shorter hospital stay of pregnant women, and lower treatment costs with outpatient management. Concerns regarding this approach are mainly related to unpredictable complications with the need for rapid obstetric interventions, which cannot be performed in time in an outpatient setting. Prerequisites for outpatient management are the compliance of the expectant mother, the adherence to strict selection criteria and the assurance of adequate monitoring at home. Future research should aim at more accurate risk assessment of obstetric complications through studies with higher case numbers and standardisation of outpatient management under evidence-based criteria.

Key words

preterm premature rupture of membranes - inpatient versus outpatient management - latency period - maternal complications - perinatal/neonatal morbidity


Publication History

Received: 17 February 2021

Accepted after revision: 19 May 2021

Article published online:
29 September 2021

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References/Literatur

  • 1 Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD. et al. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008; 371: 75-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Mercer BM. Preterm premature rupture of the membranes: current approaches to evaluation and management. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2005; 32: 411-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Mercer BM. Preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101: 178-193
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kuba K, Bernstein PS. ACOG practice bulletin no. 188: prelabor rupture of membranes. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 131: 1163-1164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kenyon S, Boulvain M, Neilson JP. Antibiotics for preterm rupture of membranes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; (12) CD001058
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Major CA, de Veciana M, Lewis DF. et al. Preterm premature rupture of membranes and abruptio placentae: is there an association between these pregnancy complications?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 672-676
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Melamed N, Hadar E, Ben-Haroush A. et al. Factors affecting the duration of the latency period in preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009; 22: 1051-1056
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bendix J, Hegaard H, Bergholt T. et al. Expectant management of PPROM and major complications before planned delivery: A retrospective cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol 2015; 35: 570-577
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ekin A, Gezer C, Taner CE. et al. Risk factors and perinatal outcomes associated with latency in preterm premature rupture of membranes between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 290: 449-455
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Goya M, Bernabeu A, García N. et al. Premature rupture of membranes before 34 weeks managed expectantly: maternal and perinatal outcomes in singletons. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 26: 290-293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Mehra S, Amon E, Hopkins S. et al. Transvaginal cervical length and amniotic fluid index: can it predict delivery latency following preterm premature rupture of membranes?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212: 400.e1-400.e9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Test G, Levy A, Wiznitzer A. et al. Factors affecting the latency period in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 283: 707-710
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Rizzo G, Capponi A, Angelini E. et al. The value of transvaginal ultrasonographic examination of the uterine cervix in predicting preterm delivery in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998; 11: 23-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Tsoi E, Fuchs I, Henrich W. et al. Sonographic measurement of cervical length in preterm prelabor amniorrhexis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 550-553
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Phupong V, Kulmala L. Factors associated with latency period in preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 29: 2650-2653
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Peaceman AM, Yinglei L, Rouse DJ. et al. Length of latency with preterm premature rupture of membranes before 32 weeksʼ gestation. Am J Perinatol 2015; 32: 57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Manuck TA, Maclean CC, Silver RM. et al. Preterm premature rupture of membranes: does the duration of latency influence perinatal outcomes?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 414.e1-414.e6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Mercer BM, Miodovnik M, Thurnau GR. et al. Antibiotic therapy for reduction of infant morbidity after preterm premature rupture of the membranes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1997; 278: 989-995
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Bond DM, Middleton P, Levett KM. et al. Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeksʼ gestation for improving pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (03) CD004735
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 AWMF-Leitlinie 015/025. Prävention und Therapie der Frühgeburt. 2019. Accessed February 16, 2021 at: https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/015-025l_S2k_Praevention-Therapie_Fruehgeburt_2020-02.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Thomson A. Care of women presenting with suspected preterm prelabour rupture of membranes from 24 + 0 weeks of gestation. BJOG 2019; 126: e152-e166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Schmitz T, Sentilhes L, Lorthe E. et al. Preterm premature rupture of membranes: CNGOF Guidelines for clinical practice – Short version. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol 2018; 46: 998-1003
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Rath W, Schlembach D. Ambulante Betreuung hypertensiver Schwangerer. Frauenarzt 2020; 61: 678-682
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Morton J, Peabody C, Newdorp J. et al. Premature rupture of membranes: A clinical study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1942; 43: 422-436
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Calkins L. Premature spontaneous rupture of the membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1952; 64: 871-877
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Taylor ES, Morgan RL, Bruns PD. et al. Spontaneous premature rupture of the fetal membranes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1961; 82: 1341-1348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Eastman NJ, Hellman LM. Williams Obstetrics. The clinical course of labor, chapter 16. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts, Inc.; 1966: 396-409
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Cunningham FG, McDonald PC, Gant NF. Williams Obstetrics. Preterm and postterm pregnancy and inappropriate fetal growth, chapter 38. Norwalk, Connecticut: Appleton and Lange; 1989: 741-753
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Carlan SJ, OʼBrien WF, Parsons MT. et al. Preterm premature rupture of membranes: a randomized study of home versus hospital management. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 81: 61-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Ryan G, Oskamp M, Seaward P. et al. Randomized controlled trial of inpatient vs. outpatient management of PPROM. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 180: S95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Abou El Senoun G, Dowswell T, Mousa HA. Planned home versus hospital care for preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes (PPROM) prior to 37 weeksʼ gestation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (04) CD008053
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Ellestad SC, Swamy GK, Sinclair T. et al. Preterm premature rupture of membrane management-inpatient versus outpatient: A retrospective review. Am J Perinatol 2008; 25: 69-73
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Beckmann M, Gardener G. Hospital versus outpatient care for preterm pre-labour rupture of membranes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 53: 119-124
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Dussaux C, Senat M-V, Bouchghoul H. et al. Preterm premature rupture of membranes: is home care acceptable?. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2018; 31: 2284-2292
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Huret E, Chanavaz-Lacheray I, Grzegorczyk-Martin V. et al. [Home care of premature rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeksʼ gestation]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2014; 42: 222-228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Garabedian C, Bocquet C, Duhamel A. et al. [Preterm rupture of membranes: Is home care a safe management?]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2016; 45: 278-284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Catt E, Chadha R, Tang S. et al. Management of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes: A Comparison of Inpatient and Outpatient Care. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2016; 38: 433-440
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Palmer L, Grabowska K, Burrows J. et al. A retrospective cohort study of hospital versus home care for pregnant women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2017; 137: 180-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Petit C, Deruelle P, Behal H. et al. Preterm premature rupture of membranes: Which criteria contraindicate home care management?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018; 97: 1499-1507
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Bouchghoul H, Kayem G, Schmitz T. et al. Outpatient versus inpatient care for preterm premature rupture of membranes before 34 weeks of gestation. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 4280
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Guckert M, Clouqueur E, Drumez E. et al. Is homecare management associated with longer latency in preterm premature rupture of membranes?. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2020; 301: 61-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Rath W, Stelzl P, Kehl S. Outpatient Induction of Labor–Are Balloon Catheters an Appropriate Method?. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2021; 81: 70-80
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Van Den Heuvel JF, Ganzevoort W, De Haan-Jebbink JM. et al. HOspital care versus TELemonitoring in high-risk pregnancy (HOTEL): study protocol for a multicentre non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2019; 9: e031700
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 (G-BA) Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss. IQTIG (Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Transparenz im Gesundheitswesen) Qualitätsreport 2019. Accessed February 16, 2021 at: https://iqtig.org/downloads/berichte/2019/IQTIG_Qualitaetsreport-2020_2021-02-11.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Nelson DM, Stempel LE, Zuspan FP. Association of prolonged, preterm premature rupture of the membranes and abruptio placentae. J Reprod Med 1986; 31: 249-253
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Bartfield MC, Carlan S. The home management of preterm premature ruptured membranes. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1998; 41: 503-514
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Sharp GC, Stock SJ, Norman JE. Fetal assessment methods for improving neonatal and maternal outcomes in preterm prelabour rupture of membranes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (10) CD010209
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Lorthe E, Ancel P-Y, Torchin H. et al. Impact of latency duration on the prognosis of preterm infants after preterm premature rupture of membranes at 24 to 32 weeksʼ gestation: a national population-based cohort study. J Pediatr 2017; 182: 47-52.e2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Ancel PY, Goffinet F. EPIPAGE 2 Writing Group. EPIPAGE 2: a preterm birth cohort in France in 2011. BMC Pediatr 2014; 14: 97
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Ayres AW. Home management of preterm premature rupture of membranes. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002; 78: 153-155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Martin D, Gardner M, Howell K. et al. Outcome and cost analysis of preterm premature rupture of membranes in an outpatient setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 463
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Doyle NM, Monga M, Kerr M. et al. Maternal stressors during prolonged antepartum hospitalization following transfer for maternal-fetal indications. Am J Perinatol 2004; 21: 27-30
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Richter MS, Parkes C, Chaw-Kant J. Listening to the voices of hospitalized high-risk antepartum patient. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2007; 36: 313-318
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Turnbull DA, Wilkinson C, Griffith EC. et al. The psychosocial outcomes of antenatal day care for three medical complications of pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial of 395 women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 46: 510-516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Ramsey PS, Nuthalapaty FS, Lu G. et al. Contemporary management of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM): a survey of maternal-fetal medicine providers. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 1497-1502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar