Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1529-6021
Distal attachment device is mandatory for screening-related colonoscopy
Cap-assisted colonoscopy first appeared in Japan in the 1990 s and since then, its use for diagnostic colonoscopy has been slowly gaining acceptance, supported by technical developments and new devices showing incremental benefit in terms of adenoma yield, an established surrogate for colorectal cancer-related mortality [1]. While the first-generation Endocuff has not been shown to be effective in this context [2] and aggregate gains from Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy (EAC) have been considered to be equivocal in comparison to standard colonoscopy (SC) [3] and transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy (TAC) [4] [5], recent high-quality evidence supports the utility of the next-generation Endocuff Vision (ECV, Olympus Japan) in the context of colon cancer screening [6] [7].
Publication History
Article published online:
25 October 2021
© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR. et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 1298-1306
- 2 van Doorn SC, van der Vlugt M, Depla A. et al. Adenoma detection with Endocuff colonoscopy versus conventional colonoscopy: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Gut 2017; 66: 438-445
- 3 Facciorusso A, Del Prete V, Buccino RV. et al. Comparative efficacy of colonoscope distal attachment devices in increasing rates of adenoma detection: a network meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16: 1209-1219
- 4 Imaeda H, Yamaoka M, Ohgo H. et al. Randomized control trial of adenoma detection rate in Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy versus transparent hood-assisted colonoscopy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 34: 1492-1496
- 5 Lahiff C, East JE. Distal attachments for adenoma detection go head-to-head: Cap or cuff?. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 34: 1471-1473
- 6 Ngu WS, Bevan R, Tsiamoulos ZP. et al. Improved adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: the ADENOMA randomised controlled trial. Gut 2019; 68: 280-288
- 7 Patel HK, Chandrasekar VT, Srinivasan S. et al. Second-generation distal attachment cuff improves adenoma detection rate: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93: 544-553
- 8 Forbes N, Hillsden RJ, Ruan Y. et al. Endocuff Vision improves adenoma detection rate in a large screening-related cohort. Endosc Int Open 2021; 09: E1583-E15920
- 9 Rajasekhar PT, Rees CJ, Bramble MG. et al. A multicenter pragmatic study of an evidence-based intervention to improve adenoma detection: the Quality Improvement in Colonoscopy (QIC) study. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 217-224
- 10 Atkinson NSS, Ket S, Bassett P. et al. Narrow-band imaging for detection of neoplasia at colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of data from individual patients in randomized controlled trials. Gastroenterology 2019; 157: 462-471
- 11 Bisschops R, Rutter MD, Areia M. et al. Overcoming the barriers to dissemination and implementation of quality measures for gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and United European Gastroenterology (UEG) position statement. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 196-202
- 12 Rivero-Sanchez L, Lopez Vicente J, Hernandez Villalba L. et al. Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy for surveillance of serrated polyposis syndrome: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 637-645
- 13 Mori Y, Kudo SE, East JE. et al. Cost savings in colonoscopy with artificial intelligence-aided polyp diagnosis: an add-on analysis of a clinical trial (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92: 905-911