Auditory Mirror Therapy for Tinnitus: A Pilot Study

Abstract

Background Tinnitus, the phantom perception of sound, shares many properties with phantom limb pain, in that both may arise as a consequence of sensory deprivation. Prediction errors in multisensory integration, such as induced with mirror box therapy in phantom pain, can reduce phantom percepts.

Purpose We evaluated if a device that swaps sound from the right pinna to the left ear canal, and from the left pinna to the right ear canal, can reduce tinnitus. We call this auditory mirror therapy (AMT).

Research Design Uncontrolled trial.

Study Sample Twenty subjects with chronic tinnitus.

Intervention An AMT device consisting of a modified ear defender device with microphones that swaps sounds from left pinna to the right ear canal and from the right pinna to the left ear canal. Participants used the device at home for 2 weeks.

Data Collection and Analysis Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire, and visual analog scale ratings of symptoms were collected at baseline and posttreatment. Repeated measures t-test were performed, Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons.

Results There was a significant reduction in THI and in awareness of tinnitus after the AMT intervention.

Conclusion Exposing the audiovisual integration system to prediction errors can help retrain phantom percepts and reduce tinnitus handicap. Further studies on this concept are warranted.

Keywords

tinnitus - mirror box therapy - pseudophone - multisensory integration

Disclosure

Clas Linnman has a patent pending for AMT.

Disclaimer

Any mention of a product, service, or procedure in the Journal of the American Academy of Audiology does not constitute an endorsement of the product, service, or procedure by the American Academy of Audiology.

Publication History

Received: 09 September 2021

Accepted: 22 January 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
25 January 2022

Article published online:
06 December 2022

• References

• 1 Sedley W, Friston KJ, Gander PE, Kumar S, Griffiths TD. An integrative tinnitus model based on sensory precision. Trends Neurosci 2016; 39 (12) 799-812
• 2 Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D. Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proc Biol Sci 1996; 263 (1369): 377-386
• 3 Campo-Prieto P, Rodriguez-Fuentes G. Effectiveness of mirror therapy in phantom limb pain: a literature review. Neurologia (Engl Ed) 2018:S0213-4853(18)30201-9
• 4 Young PT. Auditory localization with acoustical transposition of the ears. J Exp Psychol 1928; XI [phone]
• 5 Wilson PH, Henry J, Bowen M, Haralambous G. Tinnitus Reaction Questionnaire: psychometric properties of a measure of distress associated with tinnitus. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34 (01) 197-201
• 6 Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Spitzer JB. Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 122 (02) 143-148
• 7 Spielberger C, Gorsuch R, Lushene R. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1970
• 8 Zeman F, Koller M, Figueiredo R. et al. Tinnitus Handicap Inventory for evaluating treatment effects: which changes are clinically relevant?. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011; 145 (02) 282-287
• 9 De Ridder D, Vanneste S, Freeman W. The Bayesian brain: phantom percepts resolve sensory uncertainty. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2014; 44: 4-15
• 10 Aoyama A, Kuriki S. A wearable system for adaptation to left-right reversed audition tested in combination with magnetoencephalography. Biomed Eng Lett 2017; 7 (03) 205-213
• 11 Hofman PM, Vlaming MS, Termeer PJ, Van Opstal AJ. A method to induce swapped binaural hearing. J Neurosci Methods 2002; 113 (02) 167-179
• 12 Hoare DJ, Stacey PC, Hall DA. The efficacy of auditory perceptual training for tinnitus: a systematic review. Ann Behav Med 2010; 40 (03) 313-324