Reporting endoscopy quality and adverse events: Dutch step forward

Endoscopy 2022; 54(05): 496-497
DOI: 10.1055/a-1794-3460

Editorial

Referring to Nass KJ et al. p. 488–495

Authors

Jaroslaw Regula

¹Department of Oncological Gastroenterology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland

²Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland

References
1 Kaminski MF, Thomas-Gibson S, Bugajski M. et al. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 378-397
2 Valori R, Cortas G, de Lange T. et al. Performance measures for endoscopy services: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 1186-1204
3 Bugajski M, Wieszczy P, Pisera M. et al. Effectiveness of digital feedback on patient experience and 30-day complications after screening colonoscopy: a randomized health services study. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7: E537-E544
4 Adler A, Lieberman D, Aminalai A. et al. Data quality of the German screening colonoscopy registry. Endoscopy 2013; 45: 813-818
5 Kobiela J, Spychalski P, Wieszczy P. et al. Mortality and rate of hospitalization in a colonoscopy screening program from a randomized health services study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18: 1501-1508
6 Nass KJ, van der Schaar PJ, van der Vlugt M. et al. Continuous monitoring of colonoscopy performance in the Netherlands: first results of a nationwide registry. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 488-495
7 Bugajski M, Rupinski M, Wieszczy P. et al. Key performance measures for colonoscopy in the Polish Colonoscopy Screening Program. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 858-865