Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy for acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background and study aims Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) is an endoscopic procedure for management of patients with acute appendicitis (AA). In addition to being minimally invasive, it has the added advantages of preservation of appendix and simultaneous inspection of colon. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on ERAT in patients with AA.

Methods We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases (from inception through January 2022) to identify studies reporting ERAT in AA. The primary outcome was to evaluate the overall clinical and technical success of ERAT. The secondary outcome was to study the total and individual adverse events (AEs). The meta-analysis was performed using Der Simonian and Laird random effect model.

Results Seven studies reporting on 298 patients were included. The majority of the patient population was male (55.3 %), with mean age of 31 ± 12.39 years. The pooled technical success rate was 99.36 % (95 % CI 97.61–100, I² = 0) and the pooled clinical success rate was 99.29 % (95 % CI 97.48–100, I² = 0). The pooled AE rate was 0.19 % (95 % CI 0–1.55, I² = 0). The most common AE was perforation with 0.19 % (95 % CI 0–1.55, I² = 0). The recurrence rate was 6.01 % (95 % CI 2.9–9.93, I² = 20.10). Average length of procedure was 41.1 ± 7.16 min. Low heterogeneity was noted in in our meta-analysis.

Conclusions ERAT is a safe procedure with high rates of clinical and technical success in patients with AA. Further randomized controlled trials should be performed to assess the utility of ERAT in AA as compared to laparoscopic appendectomy.

Publication History

Received: 06 December 2021

Accepted after revision: 06 April 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
07 April 2022

Article published online:
15 July 2022

• References

• 1 Hardin Jr. DM. Acute appendicitis: review and update. Am Fam Physician 1999; 60: 2027-2034
• 2 Jones MW, Lopez RA, Deppen JG. et al. Appendicitis (Nursing). Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls; 2021
• 3 Soffer D, Zait S, Klausner J. et al. Peritoneal cultures and antibiotic treatment in patients with perforated appendicitis. Eur J Surg 2001; 167: 214-216
• 4 Jaschinski T, Mosch C, Eikermann M. et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients with suspected appendicitis: a systematic review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMC Gastroenterol 2015; 15: 48
• 5 Flum DR, Davidson GH. CODA Collaborative. et al. A randomized trial comparing antibiotics with appendectomy for appendicitis. N Engl J Med 2020; 383: 1907-1919
• 6 Salminen P, Paajanen H, Rautio T. et al. Antibiotic therapy vs appendectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: The APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2015; 313: 2340-2348
• 7 Salminen P, Tuominen R, Paajanen H. et al. Five-year follow-up of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in the APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 2018; 320: 1259-1265
• 8 Seetahal SA, Bolorunduro OB, Sookdeo TC. et al. Negative appendectomy: a 10-year review of a nationally representative sample. Am J Surg 2011; 201: 433-437
• 9 Flum DR, Koepsell T. The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis. Arch Surg 2002; 137: 799-804
• 10 Kang J, Zhang W, Zeng L. et al. The modified endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus antibiotic therapy alone for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children. Surg Endosc 2021; 35: 6291-6299
• 11 Liu BR, Ma X, Feng J. et al. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) : a multicenter retrospective study in China. Surg Endosc 2015; 29: 905-909
• 12 Liu BR, Song JT, Han FY. et al. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy: a pilot minimally invasive technique (with videos). Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2012; 76: 862-866
• 13 Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: 264-269 W264
• 14 Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010; 25: 603-605
• 15 Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC. et al. The Cochrane Collaborationʼs tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011; 343: d5928
• 16 Ding W, Du Z, Zhou X. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy for mnagement of acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc 2022; 36: 2480-2487
• 17 Li Y, Mi C, Li W. et al. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis by endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT): Combination of Colonoscopy and endoscopic retrograde appendicography. Dig Dis Sci 2016; 61: 3285-3291
• 18 Ye LP, Mao XL, Yang H. et al. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis techniques for the treatment of patients with acute appendicitis. Z Gastroenterol 2018; 56: 899-904
• 19 Kong LJ, Liu D, Zhang JY. et al. Digital single-operator cholangioscope for endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 396-400
• 20 Chen Y, Wang X, Zhao L. et al. Mo1664 Endoscopic intervention for acute appendicitis: retrospective study of 101 cases. Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 89: AB511
• 21 DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177-188
• 22 Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones DR. et al. Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. Chichester: Wiley; 2000
• 23 Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ. et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557-560
• 24 Kanwal F, White D. “Systematic reviews and meta-analyses” in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10: 1184-1186
• 25 Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R. et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence--inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 1294-1302
• 26 Ambe PC. Negative Appendectomy. Is it really preventable?. J Invest Surg 2019; 32: 474-475
• 27 Bhangu A, Soreide K, Di Saverio S. et al. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 2015; 386: 1278-1287
• 28 Jeon BG. Predictive factors and outcomes of negative appendectomy. Am J Surg 2017; 213: 731-738
• 29 Maloney C, Edelman MC, Bolognese AC. et al. The impact of pathological criteria on pediatric negative appendectomy rate. J Ped Surg 2019; 54: 1794-1799