Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1823-1207
Moderne perioperative Versorgungskonzepte in der Thoraxchirurgie: Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery (ERATS)
Modern Perioperative Care Concepts in Thoracic Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery (ERATS)Zusammenfassung
Bei den modernen perioperativen Versorgungskonzepten ermöglicht das multimodale ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) eine Verbesserung der postoperativen Rekonvaleszenz von chirurgischen Patienten nach einem operativen Eingriff. Es wird durch die sog. ERAS-Society geleitet und Kliniken können sich offiziell zertifizieren lassen. Der Schwerpunkt des ERAS-Konzepts liegt in einer einheitlichen Betreuung des Patienten bereits vor der Aufnahme bis zur Entlassung mit dem Ziel einer Verbesserung der perioperativen Abläufe durch Implementierung von evidenzbasierten Protokollen unter Beteiligung eines multidisziplinären Behandlungsteams. Im Jahr 2019 erschienen erstmalig ERAS-Guidelines der europäischen Gesellschaft für Thoraxchirurgie (ESTS = European Society of Thoracic Surgery) in Kooperation mit der ERAS-Society speziell für lungenresezierende Eingriffe, welche insgesamt 45 Empfehlungen bzw. Enhanced Recovery Pathways (ERP) unterschiedlicher Graduierung definierten. Durch die Implementierung von ERAS-Konzepten in der Thoraxchirurgie (ERATS = Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery) sollen standardisierte perioperative Abläufe basierend auf Studienergebnissen und/oder Expertenempfehlungen etabliert werden. Diese Empfehlungen berücksichtigen neben organisatorischen Aspekten vor allem thoraxchirurgische und anästhesiologische Vorgehensweisen mit dem übergeordneten Ziel, einen strukturierten, auf den Patienten zugeschnittenen Behandlungsplan zu erstellen. Durch all diese Maßnahmen soll ein multimodales Gesamtkonzept entstehen, das primär zu einem verbesserten Outcome nach elektiven lungenresezierenden Eingriffen und sekundär zu kürzeren Krankenhausaufenthaltsdauern mit entsprechend geringen Kosten führen soll.
Ziele dieses Übersichtsartikels sind neben der Beschreibung grundlegender ERAS-Prinzipien vor allem die kompakte Darstellung der aus Sicht der Autoren wichtigsten europäischen ERAS-Empfehlungen für lungenresezierende Operationen sowie deren Anwendung bzw. Umsetzung in der deutschen Thoraxchirurgie.
Abstract
In modern perioperative care concepts, multimodal ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) is a multimodal perioperative treatment concept for improving postoperative recovery of surgical patients after an operation. This is managed by the so-called ERAS Society and through which hospitals can also be officially certified. The focus of the ERAS concept is on uniform patient care from admission to discharge, with the aim of improving perioperative processes by implementing evidence-based protocols involving a multidisciplinary treatment team. In 2019, ERAS guidelines were published for the first time by the European Society of Thoracic Surgery (ESTS), in cooperation with the ERAS Society, for specific lung resection procedures, and these identified a total of 45 graduated recommendations or Enhanced Recovery Pathways (ERP). The implementation of ERAS concepts in thoracic surgery (ERATS = Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery) is intended to establish standardised perioperative procedures based on study results and/or expert recommendations. These recommendations take into account organisational aspects as well as thoracic surgical and anaesthesiological procedures, with the overriding goal of creating a structured treatment plan tailored to the patient. All these measures should result in a multimodal overall concept, which should primarily lead to an improved outcome after elective thoracic surgery and secondarily to shorter hospital stays with correspondingly lower costs.
This review article describes basic ERAS principles and provides a compact presentation of the most important European ERAS recommendations from the authors’ point of view, together with typical obstacles to the implementation of the corresponding ERATS program in German thoracic surgery.
Publication History
Received: 07 January 2022
Accepted after revision: 07 April 2022
Article published online:
22 June 2022
© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
Literatur
- 1 Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF. Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie. Prävention, Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Lungenkarzinoms (Langversion 1.0). 2018 Accessed August 16, 2021 at: http://leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/Lungenkarzinom.98.0.html
- 2 Begum S, Hansen HJ, Papagiannopoulos K. VATS anatomic lung resections-the European experience. J Thorac Dis 2014; 6 (Suppl. 02) S203-S210 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.05.04. (PMID: 24868437)
- 3 Berfield KS, Farjah F, Mulligan MS. Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2019; 107: 603-609 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.07.088. (PMID: 30278164)
- 4 Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD. et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 395-409 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. (PMID: 21714641)
- 5 Zentrum für Krebsregisterdaten. Krebs in Deutschland. Lunge. 14.04.2021 Accessed August 16, 2021 at: https://www.krebsdaten.de/Krebs/DE/Content/Publikationen/Krebs_in_Deutschland/kid_2019/kid_2019_c33_c34_lunge.pdf?__blob=publicationFile
- 6 Batchelor TJP, Rasburn NJ, Abdelnour-Berchtold E. et al. Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 55: 91-115 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy301. (PMID: 30304509)
- 7 Rogers LJ, Bleetman D, Messenger DE. et al. The impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol compliance on morbidity from resection for primary lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 155: 1843-1852 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.10.151. (PMID: 29352586)
- 8 Day AR, Smith RVP, Scott MJP. et al. Randomized clinical trial investigating the stress response from two different methods of analgesia after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 2015; 102: 1473-1479 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9936.
- 9 Öbrink E, Jildenstål P, Oddby E. et al. Post-operative nausea and vomiting: Update on predicting the probability and ways to minimize its occurrence, with focus on ambulatory surgery. Int J Surg 2015; 15: 100-106 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.01.024. (PMID: 25638733)
- 10 Schwenk W. Fast-Track: Evaluation eines neuen Konzeptes. Chirurg 2012; 83: 351-355 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-011-2226-1.
- 11 Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Hubner M. et al. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations: 2018. World J Surg 2019; 43: 659-695 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-018-4844-y. (PMID: 30426190)
- 12 Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W. et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 2012; 31: 783-800 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.013. (PMID: 23099039)
- 13 Nicholson A, Lowe MC, Parker J. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients. Br J Surg 2014; 101: 172-188 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9394. (PMID: 24469618)
- 14 Sibbern T, Bull Sellevold V, Steindal SA. et al. Patients’ experiences of enhanced recovery after surgery: a systematic review of qualitative studies. J Clin Nurs 2017; 26: 1172-1188 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13456. (PMID: 27345939)
- 15 Lee L, Tran T, Mayo NE. et al. What does it really mean to “recover” from an operation?. Surgery 2014; 155: 211-216 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.10.002. (PMID: 24331759)
- 16 Piccioni F, Droghetti A, Bertani A. et al. Recommendations from the Italian intersociety consensus on Perioperative Anesthesia Care in Thoracic surgery (PACTS) part 1: preadmission and preoperative care. Perioper Med 2020; 9: 37 DOI: 10.1186/s13741-020-00168-y. (PMID: 33292657)
- 17 Meybohm P, Richards T, Isbister J. et al. Patient Blood Management Bundles to Facilitate Implementation. Transfus Med Rev 2017; 31: 62-71 DOI: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2016.05.012. (PMID: 27317382)
- 18 Richtlinie Hämotherapie. Richtlinie zur Gewinnung von Blut und Blutbestandteilen und zur Anwendung von Blutprodukten. Accessed October 10, 2021 at: https://www.pei.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/newsroom/bundesanzeiger/veroeffentlichungen/2017/banz-at-06–11–2017-b5.html
- 19 Cavalheri V, Granger C. Preoperative exercise training for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; (06) CD012020 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012020.pub2. (PMID: 28589547)
- 20 Liu Z, Qiu T, Pei L. et al. Two-Week Multimodal Prehabilitation Program Improves Perioperative Functional Capability in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg 2020; 131: 840-849 DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004342. (PMID: 31348053)
- 21 Ackerman RS, Tufts CW, DePinto DG. et al. How Sweet Is This? A Review and Evaluation of Preoperative Carbohydrate Loading in the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Model. Nutr Clin Pract 2020; 35: 246-253 DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10427. (PMID: 31637778)
- 22 Yan TD, Black D, Bannon PG. et al. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Nonrandomized Trials on Safety and Efficacy of Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Lobectomy for Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 2553-2562 DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.18.2733. (PMID: 19289625)
- 23 Burt BM, Kosinski AS, Shrager JB. et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with acceptable morbidity and mortality in patients with predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second or diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide less than 40% of normal. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 148: 19-29.e1 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.03.007. (PMID: 24766848)
- 24 Elshiekh MAF, Lo TTH, Shipolini AR. et al. Does muscle-sparing thoracotomy as opposed to posterolateral thoracotomy result in better recovery?. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2013; 16: 60-67 DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivs295.
- 25 Li S, Feng Z, Wu L. et al. Analysis of 11 Trials Comparing Muscle-Sparing with Posterolateral Thoracotomy. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 62: 344-352 DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1337445.
- 26 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, AWMF. Vermeidung perioperativer Hypothermie. S3-Leitlinie der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF) – Aktualisierung 2019. Accessed August 22, 2021 at: https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/001–018l_S3_Vermeidung_perioperativer_Hypothermie_2019–08.pdf
- 27 Maier S, Eckmann C, Kramer A. Perioperative Antibiotikaprophylaxe: ein Update. Krankenhaushygiene up2date 2015; 10: 105-112 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1392456.
- 28 Anekar A, Cascella M. WHO Analgesic Ladder. 22.08.2021. Treasure Island: StatPearls 2022; Accessed August 22, 2021 at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32119322/
- 29 D’Ercole F, Arora H, Kumar PA. Paravertebral Block for Thoracic Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2018; 32: 915-927 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.10.003. (PMID: 29169795)
- 30 Yeung JHY, Gates S, Naidu BV. et al. Paravertebral block versus thoracic epidural for patients undergoing thoracotomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; (02) CD009121 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009121.pub2.
- 31 Okur E, Baysungur V, Tezel C. et al. Comparison of the single or double chest tube applications after pulmonary lobectomies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 35: 32-36 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.09.009. (PMID: 18929492)
- 32 Cerfolio RJ, Bass C, Katholi CR. Prospective randomized trial compares suction versus water seal for air leaks. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: 1613-1617 DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02474-2. (PMID: 11383809)
- 33 Koryllos A, Ludwig C, Hecker E. et al. Delphi-Konsens der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Thoraxchirurgie über das perioperative Management bei onkologischen anatomischen Lungenresektionen. Zentralbl Chir 2020; 145: 581-588 DOI: 10.1055/a-1096-1445. (PMID: 32066185)
- 34 Varela G, Jiménez MF, Novoa NM. et al. Postoperative chest tube management: measuring air leak using an electronic device decreases variability in the clinical practice. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 35: 28-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.09.005. (PMID: 18848460)
- 35 Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS. The benefits of continuous and digital air leak assessment after elective pulmonary resection: a prospective study. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 86: 396-401 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.04.016. (PMID: 18640304)
- 36 Zhou J, Lyu M, Chen N. et al. Digital chest drainage is better than traditional chest drainage following pulmonary surgery: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018; 54: 635-643 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy141. (PMID: 29659768)
- 37 Bjerregaard LS, Jensen K, Petersen RH. et al. Routinely obtained chest X-rays after elective video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery can be omitted in most patients; a retrospective, observational study. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 63: 465-471 DOI: 10.1007/s11748-015-0560-9. (PMID: 26007694)
- 38 Christensen TD, Vad H, Pedersen S. et al. Venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing operations for lung cancer: a systematic review. Ann Thorac Surg 2014; 97: 394-400 DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.10.074. (PMID: 24365217)
- 39 Wagner S, Walther A. S3-Leitlinie Prophylaxe der venösen Thromboembolie. Frauenheilkunde up2date 2017; 11: 545-555 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-125109.
- 40 Lyon A, Solomon MJ, Harrison JD. A qualitative study assessing the barriers to implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery. World J Surg 2014; 38: 1374-1380 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-013-2441-7. (PMID: 24385194)
- 41 von Meyenfeldt EM, van Nassau F, de Betue CTI. et al. Implementing an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery programme in the Netherlands: a qualitative study investigating facilitators and barriers for implementation. BMJ Open 2022; 12: e051513 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051513. (PMID: 34987041)
- 42 Pache B, Hübner M, Martin D. et al. Requirements for a successful Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program: a multicenter international survey among ERAS nurses. Eur Surg 2021; 53: 246-250 DOI: 10.1007/s10353-021-00698-9.
- 43 Johnston A, McCuthcheon C, Vella M. et al. A designated eras nurse consistently achieves ERAS goals with significant cost reductions for the NHS. Int J Surg 2015; 23: S44 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.07.169.
- 44 Khan J, McCutcheon C, Vella M. et al. Introduction of a designated eras nurse still has vital role in improving outcomes. Int J Surg 2014; 12: S28 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.107.
- 45 Pearsall EA, Meghji Z, Pitzul KB. et al. A qualitative study to understand the barriers and enablers in implementing an enhanced recovery after surgery program. Ann Surg 2015; 261: 92-96 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000604. (PMID: 24646564)