J Am Acad Audiol
DOI: 10.1055/a-1925-7830
Research Article

Wideband Tympanometry Findings in Healthy Neonates

Sreedevi Aithal
1   Department of Audiology, Townsville University Hospital, Queensland, Australia
2   Hearing Research Unit for Children, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
3   Department of Speech Pathology, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia
,
Venkatesh Aithal
1   Department of Audiology, Townsville University Hospital, Queensland, Australia
2   Hearing Research Unit for Children, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
,
Joseph Kei
2   Hearing Research Unit for Children, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
,
Matthew Wilson
4   Department of Audiology, Monash Health Melbourne, Australia
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objectives The objective of the present study was to describe pressurized wideband absorbance at tympanometric peak pressure (WBATPP) and 0 daPa (WBA0) in healthy Caucasian neonates.

Subjects A total of 249 ears from 249 neonates who passed a test battery of 1,000-Hz tympanometry, distortion product otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response were included in the study.

Method WBATPP and WBA0 were averaged in one-third octave frequencies from 0.25 to 8 kHz. Data were statistically analyzed for effects of frequency, ear, and gender.

Results Normative WBATPP and WBA0 data obtained from healthy neonates are presented. There was no significant difference between WBATPP and WBA0 at all frequencies. Both WBATPP and WBA0 demonstrated a multipeaked pattern with maxima of 0.80 and 0.72 at 1.25 to 1.5 and 6 kHz, respectively, and two minima of 0.45 and 0.49 at 0.4 to 0.5 and 4 kHz, respectively. The effects of ear and gender were not significant for both WBA measures.

Conclusion Pressurized WBATPP and WBA0 data were provided for healthy Caucasian neonates. They will be useful for the assessment of middle ear function and assist in differentiating between conductive and sensorineural hearing losses in neonates.

Disclaimer

Any mention of a product, service, or procedure in the Journal of the American Academy of Audiology does not constitute an endorsement of the product, service, or procedure by the American Academy of Audiology.




Publication History

Received: 03 May 2022

Accepted: 03 August 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
17 August 2022

Article published online:
22 February 2023

© 2023. American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Werff KRV, Prieve BA, Georgantas LM. Test-retest reliability of wideband reflectance measures in infants under screening and diagnostic test conditions. Ear Hear 2007; 28 (05) 669-681
  • 2 Stinson MR. Revision of estimates of acoustic energy reflectance at the human eardrum. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88 (04) 1773-1778
  • 3 Aithal S, Kei J, Driscoll C, Khan A, Swanston A. Wideband absorbance outcomes in newborns: a comparison with high-frequency tympanometry, automated brainstem response, and transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 2015; 36 (05) e237-e250
  • 4 Hunter LL, Feeney MP, Miller JAL, Jeng PS, Bohning S. Wideband reflectance in newborns: normative regions and relationship to hearing-screening results. Ear Hear 2010; 31 (05) 599-610
  • 5 Sanford CA, Keefe DH, Liu Y-W. et al. Sound-conduction effects on distortion-product otoacoustic emission screening outcomes in newborn infants: test performance of wideband acoustic transfer functions and 1-kHz tympanometry. Ear Hear 2009; 30 (06) 635-652
  • 6 Shaver MD, Sun XM. Wideband energy reflectance measurements: effects of negative middle ear pressure and application of a pressure compensation procedure. J Acoust Soc Am 2013; 134 (01) 332-341
  • 7 Sanford CA, Hunter LL, Feeney MP, Nakajima HH. Wideband acoustic immittance: tympanometric measures. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (Suppl. 01) 65S-71S
  • 8 Aithal S, Kei J, Driscoll C, Khan A. Normative wideband reflectance measures in healthy neonates. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 77 (01) 29-35
  • 9 Merchant GR, Horton NJ, Voss SE. Normative reflectance and transmittance measurements on healthy newborn and 1-month-old infants. Ear Hear 2010; 31 (06) 746-754
  • 10 Mazlan R, Kei J, Hickson L, Khan A, Gavranich J, Linning R. High frequency (1000 HZ) tympanometry findings in newborns: normative data using a component compensated admittance approach. Aust N Z J Audiol 2009; DOI: 10.1375/audi.31.1.15.
  • 11 American Academy of Pediatrics, Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2007 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics 2007; 120 (04) 898-921
  • 12 Keefe DH, Hunter LL, Feeney MP, Fitzpatrick DF. Procedures for ambient-pressure and tympanometric tests of aural acoustic reflectance and admittance in human infants and adults. J Acoust Soc Am 2015; 138 (06) 3625-3653
  • 13 Interacoustics. Titan: Technical specifications. 2016. Accessed August 23, 2022, at: https://interacoustics.com/titan
  • 14 Aithal S, Aithal V, Kei J, Anderson S, Liebenberg S. Eustachian tube dysfunction and wideband absorbance measurements at tympanometric peak pressure and 0 daPa. J Am Acad Audiol 2019; 30 (09) 781-791
  • 15 Wali HA, Mazlan R, Kei J. Pressurised wideband absorbance findings in healthy neonates: a preliminary study. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2017; 60 (10) 2965-2973
  • 16 Aithal S, Kei J, Aithal V. et al. Normative study of wideband acoustic immittance measures in newborn infants. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2017; 60 (05) 1417-1426
  • 17 Hunter LL, Keefe DH, Feeney MP, Fitzpatrick DF, Lin L. Longitudinal development of wideband reflectance tympanometry in normal and at-risk infants. Hear Res 2016; 340: 3-14
  • 18 Interacoustics. How do I interpret the results of 1000 Hz tympanometry? 2020. Accessed August 23, 2022, at: https://www.interacoustics.com/academy/faq/tympanometry/how-do-i-interpret-the-results-of-1000-hz-tympanometry
  • 19 Sutton GJ, Gleadle P, Rowe SJ. Tympanometry and otoacoustic emissions in a cohort of special care neonates. Br J Audiol 1996; 30 (01) 9-17