Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-1993-8036
Aligning Semantic Interoperability Frameworks with the FOXS Stack for FAIR Health Data
Abstract
Background FAIR Guiding Principles present a synergy with the use cases for digital health records, in that clinical data need to be found, accessible within a range of environments, and data must interoperate between systems and subsequently reused. The use of HL7 FHIR, openEHR, IHE XDS, and SNOMED CT (FOXS) together represents a specification to create an open digital health platform for modern health care applications.
Objectives To describe where logical FOXS components align to the European Open Science Cloud Interoperability Framework (EOSC-IF) reference architecture for semantic interoperability. This should provide a means of defining if FOXS aligns to FAIR principles and to establish the data models and structures that support longitudinal care records as being fit to underpin scientific research.
Methods The EOSC-IF Semantic View is a representation of semantic interoperability where meaning is preserved between systems and users. This was analyzed and cross-referenced with FOXS architectural components, mapping concepts, and objects that describe content such as catalogues and semantic artifacts.
Results Majority of conceptual Semantic View components were featured within the FOXS architecture. Semantic Business Objects are composed of a range of elements such as openEHR archetypes and templates, FHIR resources and profiles, SNOMED CT concepts, and XDS document identifiers. Semantic Functional Content comprises catalogues of metadata that were also supported by openEHR and FHIR tools.
Conclusions Despite some elements of EOSC-IF being vague (e.g., FAIR Digital Object), there was a broad conformance to the framework concepts and the components of a FOXS platform. This work supports a health-domain-specific view of semantic interoperability and how this may be achieved to support FAIR data for health research via a standardized framework.
Publication History
Received: 04 April 2022
Accepted: 30 November 2022
Accepted Manuscript online:
06 December 2022
Article published online:
13 February 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJJ. et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 2016; 3 (01) 160018
- 2 UK Health Data Research Alliance. . Recommendations for Data Standards in Health Research.; 2021. Accessed January 11, 2022. https://www.hdruk.ac.uk/news/health-data-research-uk-publishes-recommendations-for-data-standards-in-health-research/
- 3 Open Science Cloud - Shaping Europe's digital future. Accessed March 31, 2022 at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/open-science-cloud
- 4 European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation;. Corcho O, Eriksson M. et al. EOSC Interoperability Framework?: Report from the EOSC Executive Board Working Groups FAIR and Architecture. Publications Office; 2021. DOI: 10.2777/620649
- 5 The New European Interoperability Framework | ISA 2 . Accessed March 31, 2022 at: https://ec.europa.eu/isa2/eif_en
- 6 GO FAIR Initiative. Accessed March 31, 2022 at: https://www.go-fair.org/go-fair-initiative/
- 7 Sinaci AA, Núñez-Benjumea FJ, Gencturk M. et al. From raw data to FAIR data: the FAIRification workflow for health research. Methods Inf Med 2020; 59 (S 01): e21-e32
- 8 Frexia F, Mascia C, Lianas L. et al. openEHR is FAIR-enabling by design. Stud Health Technol Inform 2021; 281: 113-117
- 9 Bönisch C, Sargeant A, Wulff A, Parciak M, Bauer CR, Sax U. FAIRness of openEHR Archetypes and Templates. Published online 2019. Accessed July 29, 2021. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2849/paper-12.pdf
- 10 UK Caldicott Guardian Council. The Eight Caldicott principles. Published December 2020. Accessed July 30, 2021 at: https://www.ukcgc.uk/manual/principles
- 11 Hansson MG, Lochmüller H, Riess O. et al. The risk of re-identification versus the need to identify individuals in rare disease research. Eur J Hum Genet 2016; 24 (11) 1553-1558
- 12 openEHR Foundation. What is openEHR? Published 2019. Accessed June 6, 2021. https://www.openehr.org/about/what_is_openehr
- 13 Health Level Seven (HL7). . FHIR Overview. Accessed July 26, 2021. https://www.hl7.org/fhir/overview.html
- 14 SNOMED 5-Step Briefing. Accessed March 31, 2022 at: https://www.snomed.org/snomed-ct/five-step-briefing
- 15 IHE International. Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing (XDS.b). IHE ITI Technical Framework (Rev17 Vol1). Accessed July 27, 2021. https://profiles.ihe.net/ITI/TF/Volume1/ch-10.html
- 16 Wettstein R, Merzweiler A, Klass M, Heinze O. Using openEHR in XDS.b environments - opportunities and challenges. Stud Health Technol Inform 2020; 272: 300-303
- 17 Sara Mageit. The European digital health revolution in the wake of COVID-19. Healthcare IT News. Published April 12, 2021. Accessed March 31, 2022 at: https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/emea/european-digital-health-revolution-wake-covid-19
- 18 Cora Lydon. Somerset NHS Foundation Trust rolls out digital assessment forms. Digital Health. Published 2021. Accessed March 31, 2022 at: https://www.digitalhealth.net/2021/10/somerset-digital-assessment-forms/
- 19 FHIR UK Core - NHS Digital. . Accessed July 26, 2021 at: https://digital.nhs.uk/services/fhir-uk-core
- 20 openEHR Specification Program. Archetype Query Language (AQL). Accessed April 7, 2020 at: https://specifications.openehr.org/releases/QUERY/latest/AQL.html#_aql_syntax_specification
- 21 SNOMED CT. . NHS Digital. Accessed March 31, 2022 at: https://digital.nhs.uk/services/terminology-and-classifications/snomed-ct
- 22 Joe Marion. The Worldly XDS. Healthcare Innovation. Published March 27, 2015. Accessed April 4, 2022 at: https://www.hcinnovationgroup.com/interoperability-hie/blog/13024847/the-worldly-xds
- 23 Apperta Foundation. Defining an Open Platform. ; 2018. Accessed December 23, 2022. https://apperta.org/openplatforms/
- 24 What LOINC is. loinc.org. Accessed March 18, 2022 at: https://loinc.org/get-started/what-loinc-is/
- 25 Meredith J, Whitehead N, Dacey M. Utilising the FOXS Stack for FAIR architected data access. Stud Health Technol Inform 2021; 287: 134-138
- 26 Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. What is Interoperability? HIMSS. Accessed April 9, 2018 at: http://www.himss.org/library/interoperability-standards/what-is
- 27 European Commission. . Annex 2. In: European Interoperability Framework – Implementation Strategy. European Commission; 2017. Accessed April 2, 2022. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2017:134:FIN
- 28 openEHR Specification Program. Archetype Definition Language 2 (ADL2). Published 2021. Accessed April 3, 2022 at: https://specifications.openehr.org/releases/AM/latest/ADL2.html
- 29 Foundation-module FHIR. v4.6.0. Published 2022. Accessed April 3, 2022 at: https://build.fhir.org/foundation-module.html
- 30 FHIR v4.0.1 Element Definition. hl7.org. Accessed April 1, 2022 at: http://hl7.org/fhir/elementdefinition.html
- 31 FHIR AllergyIntolerance Resource v4.6.0. Accessed April 3, 2022 at: https://build.fhir.org/allergyintolerance.html
- 32 openEHR Foundation. Adverse reaction risk, Published archetype [Internet]. openEHR Clinical Knowledge Manager. Published 2021. Accessed April 3, 2022 at: https://ckm.openehr.org/ckm/archetypes/1013.1.1713
- 33 Observation Resource FHIR. v4.6.0. Accessed April 3, 2022 at: https://build.fhir.org/observation.html
- 34 openEHR Specification Program. EHR Information Model. openEHR Specifications. Accessed April 3, 2022 at: https://specifications.openehr.org/releases/RM/latest/ehr.html#_ehr_information_model
- 35 openEHR Foundation. Blood pressure, Published archetype [Internet]. openEHR Clinical Knowledge Manager. Published 2021. Accessed April 3, 2022 at: https://ckm.openehr.org/ckm/archetypes/1013.1.3574
- 36 Metke-Jimenez A, Steel J, Hansen D, Lawley M. Ontoserver: a syndicated terminology server. J Biomed Semantics 2018; 9 (01) 24
- 37 OpenEHR Clinical Knowledge Manager (CKM). . Published online 2019. Accessed December 23, 2022 at: https://ckm.openehr.org/ckm/
- 38 HL7 FHIR® UK Core R4. SIMPLIFIER.NET. Accessed April 3, 2022 at: https://simplifier.net/hl7fhirukcorer4
- 39 The FHIR collaboration platform - SIMPLIFIER.NET. Accessed April 3, 2022 at: https://simplifier.net/
- 40 Dictionary of medicines and devices (dm+d) | NHSBSA. Accessed April 3, 2022 at: https://www.nhsbsa.nhs.uk/pharmacies-gp-practices-and-appliance-contractors/dictionary-medicines-and-devices-dmd
- 41 Rinaldi E, Thun S. From OpenEHR to FHIR and OMOP data model for microbiology findings. Stud Health Technol Inform 2021; 281: 402-406
- 42 OMOP on FHIR. . Accessed April 2, 2022 at: https://omoponfhir.org/
- 43 BRIDG. . HL7 & FHIR - Biomedical Research Integrated Domain Group. National Cancer Institute. Published 2021. Accessed July 26, 2021 at: https://bridgmodel.nci.nih.gov/hl7-fhir
- 44 FAIRification Process. . Accessed March 18, 2022 at: https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/fairification-process/
- 45 International Classification of Diseases (ICD). . Accessed March 18, 2022 at: https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/classification-of-diseases