Long-term outcomes of pancreatoscopy-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy for the treatment of obstructive pancreatic duct stones

Abstract

Background and study aims Pancreatoscopy-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) has proven to be an effective first-line therapy in symptomatic chronic pancreatitis (CP) patients with obstructing pancreatic duct (PD) stones [1]. However, long-term outcomes of endoscopic EHL remain unknown. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term treatment effects of EHL as first-line therapy and to compare with those obtained in a historical cohort of patients who underwent extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) as primary treatment.

Patients and methods An observational retrospective single-center long-term follow-up study was performed including 19 consecutive patients who previously underwent endoscopic EHL compared to 18 patients who underwent ESWL followed by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). The primary endpoint was long-term treatment success after EHL or ESWL defined as no recurrence of symptomatic intraductal stones confirmed on imaging. Secondary endpoints for the EHL-population included long-term clinical success (i. e., a similar or lower Izbicki Pain Score or reduction in opiate usage as compared to 6-month follow-up), quality of life (QoL), pancreatic function and hospital re-admission rate.

Results In the EHL group, 37 % of the patients developed recurrent symptomatic PD stones versus 61 % in the ESWL group after a median follow-up of 35.0 and 76.5 months. Of the patients with recurrence, 71 % versus 100 % underwent a reintervention. Median time to recurrence was 12.0 versus 13.0 months. Clinical success sustained in 58 % of the EHL patients. QoL was not significantly different compared with 6-month follow-up and baseline.

Conclusions Also at long-term follow-up, endoscopic EHL as first-line treatment is moderately effective for symptomatic CP patients with treatment success rates that seems at least equally effective as ESWL.

Publication History

Received: 09 November 2022

Accepted after revision: 30 January 2023

Article published online:
24 March 2023

• References

• 1 Beyer G, Habtezion A, Werner J. et al. Chronic pancreatitis. Lancet (London, England) 2020; 396: 499-512
• 2 Bornman PC, Marks IN, Girdwood AW. et al. Pathogenesis of pain in chronic pancreatitis: ongoing enigma. World J Surg 2003; 27: 1175-1182
• 3 Löhr JM, Dominguez-Munoz E, Rosendahl J. et al. United European Gastroenterology evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and therapy of chronic pancreatitis (HaPanEU). United Eur Gastroenterol J 2017; 5: 153-199
• 4 Dumonceau J-M, Delhaye M, Tringali A. et al. Endoscopic treatment of chronic pancreatitis: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Updated August 2018. Endoscopy 2019; 51: 179-193
• 5 Choi KS, Kim MH. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of pancreatic duct stones. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2006; 13: 86-93
• 6 McCarty TR, Sobani Z, Rustagi T. Per-oral pancreatoscopy with intraductal lithotripsy for difficult pancreatic duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2020; 08: 1460-1470
• 7 Catalano MF. Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic duct strictures. Tech Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 1: 168-174
• 8 van der Wiel SE, Stassen PMC, Poley JW. et al. Pancreatoscopy-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy for the treatment of obstructive pancreatic duct stones: a prospective consecutive case series. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95: 905-914
• 9 Schneider A, Löhr JM, Singer MV. The M-ANNHEIM classification of chronic pancreatitis: Introduction of a unifying classification system based on a review of previous classifications of the disease. J Gastroenterol 2007; 42: 101-119
• 10 Issa Y, Kempeneers MA, Bruno MJ. et al. Effect of early surgery vs endoscopy-first approach on pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis: The ESCAPE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2020; 323: 237-247
• 11 Mols F, Pelle AJ, Kupper N. Normative data of the SF-12 health survey with validation using postmyocardial infarction patients in the Dutch population. Qual Life Res 2009; 18: 403-414
• 12 Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller S. How to Score SF-12. Boston: The Health Instiutte, New England Medical Center; 1995
• 13 Cahen DL, Gouma DJ, Laramée P. et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic vs surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2011; 141: 1690-1695
• 14 Drewes AM, Krarup AL, Detlefsen S. et al. Pain in chronic pancreatitis: The role of neuropathic pain mechanisms. Gut 2008; 57: 1616-1627
• 15 Anderson MA, Akshintala V, Albers KM. et al. Mechanism, assessment and management of pain in chronic pancreatitis: Recommendations of a multidisciplinary study group. Pancreatol Off J Int Assoc Pancreatol 2016; 16: 83-94
• 16 Machicado JD, Amann ST, Anderson MA. et al. Quality of life in chronic pancreatitis is determined by constant pain, disability/unemployment, current smoking, and associated co-morbidities. Am J Gastroenterol 2017; 112: 633-642
• 17 de Rijk FEM, van Veldhuisen CL, Besselink MG. et al. Implementation of an evidence-based management algorithm for patients with chronic pancreatitis (COMBO trial): study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial. Trials 2023; 24: 1-10
• 18 Han S, Miley A, Akshintala V. et al. Per-oral pancreatoscopy-guided lithotripsy vs. extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treating refractory main pancreatic duct stones in chronic pancreatitis: Protocol for an open-label multi-center randomized clinical trial. Pancreatology 2022; 8: 1120-1125