Kommentar zu „Peripher eingeführte zentrale Venenkatheter: Mehr Lumen, mehr Infektionen?“

• Literatur

• 1 Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prosective studies. Mayo Clin Proc 2006; 81: 1159-1171
• 2 Garnacho-Montero J, Aldabo-Pallas T, Palomar-Martinez M. et al. Risk factors and prognosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection in critically ill patients: a multicenter study. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 2185-2193
• 3 Chopra V, Anand S, Krein SL. et al. Bloodstream infection, venous thrombosis, and peripherally inserted central catheters: reappraising the evidence. Am J Med 2012; 125: 733-741
• 4 Gunst M, Matsushima K, Vank S. et al. Peripherally inserted central Catheters may lower the incidence of catheter-related blood stream infections in patients in surgical intensive care units. Surg Infect 2011; 12: 279-282
• 5 Pongruanporn M, Ajenjo MC, Russo AJ. et al. Patient-and device-Specific risk factors for peripherally inserted central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013; 32: 125-130
• 6 Ajenjo MC, Morley JC, Russo AJ. et al. Peripherally inserted central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections in hospitalized adult patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2011; 32: 125-130
• 7 Chopra V, Anand S, Hickner A. et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2013; 382: 311-325
• 8 Prävention von Infektionen, die von Gefäßkathetern ausgehen, Teil 1-Nichtgetunnelte zentralvenöse Katheter. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 2017; 60: 171-206