Competency assessment: a journey of lifelong learning

Endoscopy 2023; 55(09): 857-858
DOI: 10.1055/a-2100-1294

Editorial

Referring to Khan R et al. p. 847–856

Autor*innen

Arjun D. Koch

¹Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute – University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands

References
1 Walsh CM. In-training gastrointestinal endoscopy competency assessment tools: types of tools, validation and impact. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2016; 30: 357-374
2 Ekkelenkamp VE, Koch AD, de Man RA. et al. Training and competence assessment in GI endoscopy: a systematic review. Gut 2016; 65: 607-615
3 Cotton PB. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: maximizing benefits and minimizing risks. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2012; 22: 587-599
4 ERCP – the way forward. A standards framework. British Society of Gastroenterology ERCP Working Party. https://www.bsg.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/ERCP-%E2%80%93-The-Way-Forward-A-Standards-Framework-1.pdf Available at (Accessed: 05/24/2023):
5 Baron TH, Petersen BT, Mergener K. et al. Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 892-897
6 Domagk D, Oppong KW, Aabakken L. et al. Performance measures for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 1116-1127
7 Johnson G, Webster G, Boškoski I. et al. Curriculum for ERCP and endoscopic ultrasound training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 1071-1087
8 Khan R, Homsi H, Gimpaya N. et al. Validity evidence for observational ERCP competency assessment tools: a systematic review. Endoscopy 2023; 55: 847-856