Chemoselective Reduction of Barbiturates by Photochemically Excited Flavin Catalysts

Abstract

Photocatalytic reductive cyclizations are powerful methods for obtaining structurally complex molecules. Achieving noninherent reactivity in substrates with more than one potential site of reduction is a difficult challenge. We disclose the use of flavin catalysis for the chemoselective reductive cyclization of barbiturates with additional reactive functional groups. Our method provides orthogonal selectivity in comparison to the well-established reductant samarium(II) iodide, which preferentially reduces substrate ketone groups. Flavin catalysis first leads to barbiturate reduction and allows a complete change of chemoselectivity in barbiturates with appended ketones. Additionally, flavin photocatalysis enables the reductive cyclization of substrates with appended oxime ethers in >99% yield, which is not possible with SmI₂.

Key words

flavin catalysis - photochemistry - chemoselectivity - reductive catalysis - barbiturates

• References and Notes

• 1 Péter Á, Agasti S, Knowles O, Pye E, Procter DJ. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021; 50: 5349
• 2 Streuff J. Synthesis 2013; 45: 281
• 3a Nicolaou KC, Ellery SP, Chen JS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009; 48: 7140
• 3b Szostak M, Spain M, Procter DJ. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013; 42: 9155
• 3c Szostak M, Fazakerley NJ, Parmar D, Procter DJ. Chem. Rev. 2014; 114: 5959
• 3d Heravi MM, Nazari A. RSC Adv. 2022; 12: 9944
• 4 Mechanistic switching was also observed when coordinating additives were used: Szostak M, Spain M, Sautier B, Procter DJ. Org. Lett. 2014; 16: 5694
• 5 Hutton TK, Muir KW, Procter DJ. Org. Lett. 2003; 5: 4811
• 6a Amiel-Levy M, Hoz S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009; 131: 8280
• 6b Hoz S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020; 53: 2680

Examples of mechanistic switches in photochemical reduction:
• 7a Rong J, Seeberger PH, Gilmore K. Org. Lett. 2018; 20: 4081
• 7b Bergamaschi E, Lunic D, McLean LA, Hohenadel M, Chen Y.-K, Teskey CJ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022; 61: e202114482
• 7c Du J, Espelt LR, Guzei IA, Yoon TP. Chem. Sci. 2011; 2: 2115
• 8a Huang H.-M, Procter DJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016; 138: 7770
• 8b Huang H.-M, Procter DJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017; 139: 1661
• 9 Szostak M, Sautier B, Spain M, Behlendorf M, Procter DJ. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013; 52: 12559

Reviews on photoredox catalysis:
• 10a Prier CK, Rankic DA, MacMillan DW. C. Chem. Rev. 2013; 113: 5322
• 10b Romero NA, Nicewicz DA. Chem. Rev. 2016; 116: 10075

Selected examples:
• 11a Tarantino KT, Liu P, Knowles RR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013; 135: 10022
• 11b Fava E, Nakajima M, Nguyen AL. P, Rueping M. J. Org. Chem. 2016; 81: 6959
• 11c Qi L, Chen Y. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016; 55: 13312
• 11d Venditto NJ, Liang YS, El Mokadem RK, Nicewicz DA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022; 144: 11888
• 12 For reductive photocatalysis with flavins, see: Martinez-Haya R, Miranda MA, Marin ML. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 2164

For reductive photocatalysis with deazaflavins, see:
• 13a Graml A, Neveselý T, Jan Kutta R, Cibulka R, König B. Nat. Commun. 2020; 11: 3174
• 13b Pavlovska T, Král Lesný D, Svobodová E, Hoskovcová I, Archipowa N, Kutta RJ, Cibulka R. Chem. Eur. J. 2022; 28: e202200768
• 14 Foja R, Walter A, Jandl C, Thyrhaug E, Hauer J, Storch G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022; 144: 4721
• 15a Sancar A. Biochemistry 1994; 33: 2
• 15b Tan C, Liu Z, Li J, Guo X, Wang L, Sancar A, Zhong D. Nat. Commun. 2015; 6: 7302
• 15c Zhong D. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2015; 66: 691
• 15d Brettel K, Müller P, Yamamoto J. ACS Catal. 2022; 12: 3041
• 16 Sandoval BA, Clayman PD, Oblinsky DG, Oh S, Nakano Y, Bird M, Scholes GD, Hyster TK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021; 143: 1735
• 17a Page CG, Cooper SJ, DeHovitz JS, Oblinsky DG, Biegasiewicz KF, Antropow AH, Armbrust KW, Ellis JM, Hamann LG, Horn EJ, Oberg KM, Scholes GD, Hyster TK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021; 143: 97
• 17b Laguerre N, Riehl PS, Oblinsky DG, Emmanuel MA, Black MJ, Scholes GD, Hyster TK. ACS Catal. 2022; 12: 9801
• 18 Page CG, Cao J, Oblinsky DG, MacMillan SN, Dahagam S, Lloyd RM, Charnock SJ, Scholes GD, Hyster TK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023; 145: 11866
• 19a Velikogne S, Breukelaar WB, Hamm F, Glabonjat RA, Kroutil W. ACS Catal. 2020; 10: 13377
• 19b Fu H, Lam H, Emmanuel MA, Kim JH, Sandoval BA, Hyster TK. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021; 143: 9622
• 19c Kumar Roy T, Sreedharan R, Ghosh P, Gandhi T, Maiti D. Chem. Eur. J. 2022; 28: e202103949

Reviews on flavin catalysis in organic chemistry:
• 20a Sideri IK, Voutyritsa E, Kokotos CG. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018; 16: 4596
• 20b Rehpenn A, Walter A, Storch G. Synthesis 2021; 53: 2583
• 21 Kise N, Tuji T, Sakurai T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016; 57: 1790
• 22 Analytical Data for Compound 8 White solid (25.6 mg, 94 μmol, 94% (quant. NMR yield)). TLC: R_f = 0.37 (n-pentane/EtOAc, 50/50) [KMnO₄]. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, acetone-d ₆, 298 K): δ = 5.35 (s, 1 H, O-H³), 5.16 (s, 1 H, O-H⁹), 3.08 (s, 3 H, H⁵), 3.00 (s, 3 H, H²), 2.47–2.29 (m, 1 H, H^11a), 1.88–1.77 (m, 1 H, H^10a), 1.74–1.67 (m, 2 H, H⁶), 1.66–1.55 (m, 2 H, H^10b,^11b), 1.27–1.19 (m, 1 H, H^7a), 1.07 (s, 4 H, H^7b,¹²), 0.82 (t, ³ J _H–H = 7.3 Hz, 3 H, H⁸) ppm. ¹³C{¹H} NMR (101 MHz, acetone-d ₆, 298 K): δ = 173.9 (C⁶), 152.7 (C¹), 91.6 (C³), 82.7 (C⁹), 55.1 (C⁴), 38.4 (C⁶), 37.1 (C¹⁰), 30.1 (C¹¹), 28.8 (C²), 28.1 (C⁵), 24.9 (C¹²), 18.4 (C⁷), 14.7 (C⁸) ppm. HRMS (ESI⁺): m/z calcd for [M + H]⁺ = [C₁₃H₂₃N₂O₄]⁺: 271.1652; found: 271.1635. IR: (ATR): ν = 3400 (br OH), 2960, 2874, 2034, 1854, 1732, 1703, 1648 (C=O), 1587, 1549, 1513, 1450, 1415, 1377, 1333, 1309, 1246, 1129, 1080, 1062, 1028, 1013, 972, 942, 882, 861, 836, 795, 755, 743, 721, 698, 656 cm^–1.

Examples of γ-terpinene as a reductant in photochemistry:
• 23a Schweitzer-Chaput B, Horwitz MA, de Pedro Beato E, Melchiorre P. Nat. Chem. 2019; 11: 129
• 23b de Pedro Beato E, Mazzarella D, Balletti M, Melchiorre P. Chem. Sci. 2020; 11: 6312
• 24a Epple R, Carell T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1998; 37: 938
• 24b Cichon MK, Arnold S, Carell TA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002; 41: 767
• 25a Ghisla S, Massey V. Eur. J. Biochem. 1989; 181: 1
• 25b Srivastava V, Singh PK, Srivastava A, Singh PP. RSC Adv. 2021; 11: 14251
• 26 Hitomi K, Nakamura H, Kim S.-T, Mizukoshi T, Ishikawa T, Iwai S, Todo T. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 10103
• 27 Representative Procedure Ketone 6 (14 mg, 50 μmol, 1.00 equiv.), flavin 9 (1.4 mg, 2.5 μmol, 5 mol%), and imidazole (27 mg, 400 μmol, 8.0 equiv.) were combined in a crimp cap vial and sealed. The reaction vessel was evacuated and backfilled with argon thrice. Subsequently, N,N-dimethylformamide (anhydrous, 250 μL, 0.2 M) and γ-terpinene (16 μL, 100 μmol, 2.00 equiv.) were added, and the vial was irradiated at λ_max = 365 nm and a controlled reaction temperature of 15 °C for 16 h. The vial was then opened, the solution was transferred to a flask (rinsed with acetone thrice), and all volatiles were removed in vacuo. 1,3,5-Benzene tricarboxylic acid trimethyl ester (10 μmol) was added as an internal standard and the NMR spectrum was recorded. The crude compound was purified by column chromatography to afford product 7.
• 28 Analytical Data for Compound 7 White solid (11.1 mg, 40 μmol, 79% (96% NMR-yield)); TLC: R_f = 0.23 (n-pentane/EtOAc, 60/40) [KMnO₄]. The compound was isolated as a single diastereomer. However, compound 7 was observed to contain two isomers which are assigned to an open chain (major) ‘H^a’ and lactol (minor) ‘H^b’ form. ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CD₂Cl₂, 298 K): δ = 4.69 (br s, 1 H, C³-OH), 3.16 (s, 3 H, H^6a), 3.14 (s, 3 H, H^6b), 2.97 (s, 3 H, H^2b), 2.88 (s, 3 H, H^2a), 2.51–2.40 (m, 3 H, H⁸,^14-1), 2.37–2.26 (m, 1 H, H¹¹), 2.18–2.10 (m, 1 H, H^7-1), 2.08 (s, 3 H, H^10a), 2.05–1.93 (m, 1 H, H^13-1), 1.83–1.75 (m, 1 H, H^7-2), 1.73–1.63 (m, 1 H, H^14-2), 1.42 (s, 3 H, H^10b), 1.18–1.02 (m, 1 H, H^13-2), 0.69 (d, ³ J _H–H = 7.5 Hz, 3 H, H^12a), 0.63 (d, ³ J _H–H = 7.5 Hz, 3 H, H^12b) ppm. ¹³C{¹H} NMR (101 MHz, CD₂Cl₂, 298 K): δ = 210.9 (C^9a), 175.1 (C^5b), 172.9 (C^5a), 152.3 (C¹), 95.6 (C^9b), 94.2 (C^3b), 92.8 (C^3a), 55.8 (C^4a), 47.7 (C^4b), 45.4 (C^11b), 44.6 (C^11a), 38.9 (C^8a), 33.5 (C^14a), 30.5 (C^13b), 30.2 (C^14b), 30.1 (C^2b), 29.8 (C^10b), 29.7 (C^10a), 28.8 (C^13a), 28.6 (C^2a), 28.1 (C^6b), 27.8 (C^7b), 27.8 (C^6a), 27.1 (C^8b), 26.2 (C^7a), 17.2 (C^12a), 14.5 (C^12b) ppm. HRMS (ESI⁺): m/z calcd for [M + H]⁺ = [C₁₄H₂₃N₂O₄]⁺: 283.1652; found: 283.1658. IR (ATR): 3346 (OH), 2960, 2877, 1733, 1684, 1649 (C=O), 1549, 1449, 1414, 1382, 1340, 1308, 1259, 1172, 1153, 1122, 1094, 1061, 1002, 961, 929, 885, 843, 755, 735, 722, 661.9 cm^–1.
• 29a Singh AK, Bakshi RK, Corey EJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987; 109: 6187
• 29b Hasegawa E, Curran DP. J. Org. Chem. 1993; 58: 5008
• 30 For the related SmI₂-mediated reduction of γ-indolylketones, see: Beemelmanns C, Nitsch D, Bentz C, Reissig H.-U. Chem. Eur. J. 2019; 25: 8780

For the related SmI₂-mediated reduction of α,β-unsaturated esters in cyclic imide substrate side chain, see:
• 31a Shi S, Szostak M. Org. Lett. 2015; 17: 5144
• 31b Shi S, Lalancette R, Szostak R, Szostak M. Chem. Eur. J. 2016; 22: 11949
• 32 Computational study of a SmI₂-mediated reduction with chelate complex intermediates: Achazi AJ, Andrae D, Reissig H.-U, Paulus B. J. Comput. Chem. 2017; 38: 2693
• 33a Chiara JL, Marco-Contelles J, Khiar N, Gallego P, Destabel C, Bernabe M. J. Org. Chem. 1995; 60: 6010
• 33b Marco-Contelles J, Gallego P, Rodríguez-Fernández M, Khiar N, Destabel C, Bernabé M, Martínez-Grau A, Chiara JL. J. Org. Chem. 1997; 62: 7397
• 34 On the reduced reactivity of SmI₂ towards oxime ethers, see: Ning L, Li H, Lai Z, Szostak M, Chen X, Dong Y, Jin S, An J. J. Org. Chem. 2021; 86: 2907