Rofo 2024; 196(07): 699-706
DOI: 10.1055/a-2213-2320
Review

Prognostic role of the skeletal musculature in oncology: significance, coherences and clinical implications

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Alexey Surov
1   Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Wesling Medical Center, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany
,
Andreas Wienke
2   Institute of Medical Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Informatics, Martin Luther University Halle Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
,
Ralf Gutzmer
3   Department of Dermatology, Johannes Wesling Medical Center, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany
,
Jan Borggrefe
1   Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology and Nuclear Medicine, Johannes Wesling Medical Center, Ruhr University Bochum, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Preview

Abstract

Background

Sarcopenia is defined as a loss of muscle mass and strength as well as decreased physical performance.

Method

The present study provides a systematic overview of the current literature in regard to the prognostic role of sarcopenia in oncology.

Conclusion

In oncologic patients, sarcopenia occurs in 39.6 % of cases in a curative setting and in 49.2 % in a palliative setting. Sarcopenia is associated with dose-limiting toxicity. Furthermore, sarcopenia is associated with the occurrence of postoperative complications. Also, reduced muscle mass limits overall survival in most tumors both in a curative and a palliative setting. Therefore, analysis of the skeletal musculature on staging CT should be implemented in the clinical routine in oncology.

Key Points

  • In oncologic patients, the prevalence of sarcopenia is 39.6 % in a curative setting and 49.2 % in a palliative setting.

  • Sarcopenia is associated with dose-limiting toxicity and treatment response.

  • Sarcopenia predicts overall survival in oncologic patients.

Citation Format

  • Surov A, Wienke A, Gutzmer R et al. Prognostic role of the skeletal musculature in oncology: significance, coherences and clinical implications. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 699 – 706



Publication History

Received: 10 July 2023

Accepted: 02 November 2023

Article published online:
22 December 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany