Endoscopy 2024; 56(04): 249-257
DOI: 10.1055/a-2219-3179
Original article

Lumen-apposing metal stents for the treatment of pancreatic and peripancreatic fluid collections and bleeding risk: a propensity matched study

 1   Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
 2   Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
,
 3   Gastroenterology, AJG Hospitals, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, India
,
 4   Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Francesco Auriemma
 1   Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
,
Jorge Vargas-Madrigal
 5   Gastroenterology Department, Enrique Baltodano Briceno Hospital, Liberia, Costa Rica
,
 6   Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Istituto Scientifico Universitario San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
,
Carmelo Barbera
 7   Gastroenterology Unit, Civil Hospital Giuseppe Mazzini, Teramo, Italy
,
Hazem Ashhab
 8   Gastroenterology, Ahli Hospital, Hebron, Palestine, State of
,
Tae Jun Song
 9   Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, Songpa-gu, Korea (the Republic of)
,
10   Bergen Research group for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (BRAGE), Department of Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
,
11   Division of Upper Gastrointestinal and Metabolic Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
,
Jong Ho Moon
12   Internal Medicine, Soon Chung Hyang University School of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea (the Republic of)
,
Stefano Francesco Crinò
13   Gastroenterology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
,
14   Division of Hospital and Ambulatory Medicine, and Pancreas Research Unit, Department of Medicine, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
,
Giovanni Aragona
15   Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy
,
Mark A. De Lusong
16   Interventional Endoscopy, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
,
Jahnvi Dhar
 4   Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
,
Andrew Ofosu
17   Division of Digestive Diseases, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, United States
,
Agostino Ventra
18   Gastroenterology, Azienda Ospedaliera Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy
,
 1   Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Humanitas Mater Domini, Castellanza, Italy
,
Gianluca Franchellucci
19   Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
,
Alessandro Repici
 2   Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
19   Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
,
Alberto Larghi
20   Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
,
21   Gastroenterology, University of Foggia Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Foggia, Italy
,
PFC LAMS study group
› Author Affiliations


Abstract

Introduction Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) using the Hot-Axios device has recently been associated with a significant risk of bleeding. This adverse event (AE) seems to occur less frequently with the use of a different device, the Spaxus stent. The aim of the current study was to compare the rates of bleeding between the two stents.

Methods Patients admitted for treatment of PFCs by EUS plus lumen-apposing metal stent in 18 endoscopy referral centers between 10 July 2019 and 28 February 2022 were identified and their outcomes compared using a propensity-matching analysis.

Results 363 patients were evaluated. After a 1-to-1 propensity score match, 264 patients were selected (132 per group). The technical and clinical success rates were comparable between the two groups. Significantly more bleeding requiring transfusion and/or intervention occurred in the Hot-Axios group than in the Spaxus group (6.8% vs. 1.5%; P = 0.03); stent type was a significant predictor of bleeding in both univariate and multivariate regression analyses (P = 0.03 and 0.04, respectively). Bleeding necessitating arterial embolization did not however differ significantly between the two groups (3.0% vs. 0%; P = 0.12). In addition, the Hot-Axios was associated with a significantly higher rate of overall AEs compared with the Spaxus stent (9.8% vs. 3.0%; P = 0.04).

Conclusion Our study showed that, in patients with PFCs, bleeding requiring transfusion and/or intervention occurred significantly more frequently with use of the Hot-Axios stent than with the Spaxus stent, although this was not the case for bleeding requiring embolization.

Supplementary material



Publication History

Received: 07 January 2023

Accepted after revision: 23 October 2024

Article published online:
18 January 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Bhakta D, de Latour R, Khanna L. Management of pancreatic fluid collections. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 7: 17
  • 2 Luangsukrerk T, Harinwan K, Khoo S. et al. Drainage of complex walled-off pancreatic fluid collections in LAMS era: A multicenter study. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 2022: 9250370
  • 3 Jearth V, Rana SS. Endoscopic step up: When and how. Surg Open Sci 2022; 10: 135-144
  • 4 Bang JY, Hasan M, Navaneethan U. et al. Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) for pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) drainage: may not be business as usual. Gut 2017; 66: 2054-2056
  • 5 Bang JY, Navaneethan U, Hasan MK. et al. Non-superiority of lumen-apposing metal stents over plastic stents for drainage of walled-off necrosis in a randomised trial. Gut 2019; 68: 1200-1209
  • 6 Brimhall B, Han S, Tatman PD. et al. Increased incidence of pseudoaneurysm bleeding with lumen-apposing metal stents compared to double-pigtail plastic stents in patients with peripancreatic fluid collections. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16: 1521-1528
  • 7 Lang GD, Fritz C, Bhat T. et al. EUS-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing metal stents and plastic double-pigtail stents: comparison of efficacy and adverse event rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 150-157
  • 8 Ramai D, Facciorusso A, De Luca M. et al. Adverse events associated with AXIOS stents: Insights from the manufacturer and user facility device experience database. Endosc Ultrasound 2022; 11: 231-236
  • 9 Rimbaş M, Pizzicanella M, Larghi A. EUS-guided treatment of WON using lumen-apposing metal stents: protocol standardisation based on the occurrence of natural healing processes. Gut 2019; 68: 1334-1335
  • 10 Jo SJ, Moon JH, Lee YN. et al. A novel bipolar electrocautery-enhanced delivery system with a lumen-apposing metal stent for EUS-guided drainage: A porcine study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2023; 30: 263-268
  • 11 Mangiavillano B, Moon JH, Facciorusso A. et al. EUS-guided biliary drainage with a novel electrocautery-enhanced lumen apposing metal stent as first approach for distal malignant biliary obstruction: a prospective study. Endosc Intern Open 2022; 10: E998-E1003
  • 12 Teoh AYB, Bapaye A, Lakhtakia S. et al. Prospective multicenter international study on the outcomes of a newly developed self-approximating lumen-apposing metallic stent for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections and endoscopic necrosectomy. Dig Endosc 2020; 32: 391-398
  • 13 Larghi A, Crinò SF, Vanella G. et al. Preliminary experience of EUS-guided pancreatic fluid collections drainage using a new lumen-apposing metal stent mounted on a cautery device. Endosc Ultrasound 2022; 11: 84-85
  • 14 Mangiavillano B, Moon JH, Crinò SF. et al. Safety and efficacy of a novel electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent in interventional EUS procedures (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95: 115-122
  • 15 Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L. et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 446-454
  • 16 Austin PC. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Stat Med 2007; 27: 2037-2049
  • 17 Austin PC. An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res 2011; 46: 399-424
  • 18 Facciorusso A, Di Maso M, Antonino M. et al. Polidocanol injection decreases the bleeding rate after colon polypectomy: A propensity score analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82: 350-358
  • 19 Kahan BC. Accounting for centre-effects in multicentre trials with a binary outcome – when, why, and how?. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014; 14: 20
  • 20 Rodrigues-Pinto E, Baron TH. Evaluation of the AXIOS stent for the treatment of pancreatic fluid collections. Expert Rev Med Devices 2016; 13: 793-805
  • 21 Lang GD, Fritz C, Bhat T. et al. EUS-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing metal stents and plastic double-pigtail stents: comparison of efficacy and adverse event rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 150-157
  • 22 Patil R, Ona MA, Papafragkakis C. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided placement of AXIOS stent for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections. Ann Gastroenterol 2016; 29: 168-173
  • 23 Rimbaş M, Pizzicanella M, Larghi A. EUS-guided treatment of WON using lumen-apposing metal stents: protocol standardisation based on the occurrence of natural healing processes. Gut 2019; 68: 1334-1335